The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services


Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC



International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

AIAG - Automotive Industry Action Group

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Organization for Standardization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

Single Post View
 
Old 24th February 2007, 11:39 AM
QCAce's Avatar
QCAce

 
 
Total Posts: 189
Re: What is the difference between a 7D format and an 8D format?

I personally prefer and use a 4 step process:
1-problem description
2-assignment and tracking date
3-root cause and corrective action
4-verification

Of course, I'm not in a company where 8D is a customer requirement. I'm not opposed to 8D. More important I think is the requirements we use to define when a corrective action should be written: significant or repeated events and it is based on facts and data.

Sponsored Links
 

The time now is 07:00 PM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



Misc. Internal Links


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"