MichelleQA
Registered
We had our certification audit and were written up for a finding regarding 8.3. Previously we had excluded this from our scope, yet this auditor stated it could no longer be done. (FYI- We are a build to print job shop)
NC From Audit:
8.3 Design and Development ➢ Company does not design or develop any of its products. Design and development is the sole responsibility of the customer. Company clearly advertises and communicates they are a “build to print” shop with no change or design authority. Our customers have the sole design authority of any and all parts.
NC 1 generated since RM Machine does perform development, they develop CNC programs for all machined items IAW customer drawings / Specs. Additionally, RM Machining provides value added external services in their scope in the quality manual which requires them to develop those processes as well.
I see in the IAQG 9100:2016 clarifications it notes that "9100 requirements is for design and development of products and services, no of processes. An organization can use clause 8.3 for process development but it is not a requirement."
If I am understanding this correctly - based on the write up and the clarification this is NOT an NC, since the intention is for the design and development of product not for a process, correct? Should I challenge the NC?
NC From Audit:
8.3 Design and Development ➢ Company does not design or develop any of its products. Design and development is the sole responsibility of the customer. Company clearly advertises and communicates they are a “build to print” shop with no change or design authority. Our customers have the sole design authority of any and all parts.
NC 1 generated since RM Machine does perform development, they develop CNC programs for all machined items IAW customer drawings / Specs. Additionally, RM Machining provides value added external services in their scope in the quality manual which requires them to develop those processes as well.
I see in the IAQG 9100:2016 clarifications it notes that "9100 requirements is for design and development of products and services, no of processes. An organization can use clause 8.3 for process development but it is not a requirement."
If I am understanding this correctly - based on the write up and the clarification this is NOT an NC, since the intention is for the design and development of product not for a process, correct? Should I challenge the NC?