The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums
AS9100D Process Map Requirements - PEAR Forms
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
AS9100D Process Map Requirements - PEAR Forms
AS9100D Process Map Requirements - PEAR Forms
AS9100D Process Map Requirements - PEAR Forms
AS9100D Process Map Requirements - PEAR Forms
AS9100D Process Map Requirements - PEAR Forms
AS9100D Process Map Requirements - PEAR Forms
AS9100D Process Map Requirements - PEAR Forms
AS9100D Process Map Requirements - PEAR Forms
AS9100D Process Map Requirements - PEAR Forms
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > > >
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

AS9100D Process Map Requirements - PEAR Forms


Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services


Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC



International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

AIAG - Automotive Industry Action Group

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Organization for Standardization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags
as9100 revision d (2016), pear (process effectiveness assessment report), process mapping
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 4th December 2017, 05:50 PM
Mjtaur

 
 
Total Posts: 21
Question AS9100D Process Map Requirements - PEAR Forms

Hello all,

This might sound like a ridiculous question but here is the scenario:

Company has three processes: Management, Manufacturing and Purchasing.

Only Manufacturing and Purchasing have PEARs.

However, the QM process maps ARE interactions of all activities, but not titled, nor are the specifically just Manufacturing, Management or Purchasing. As a matter of fact, they are titled Quality Process map, Manufacturing Process map and Detailed Manufacturing Process Map. This leads me to believe those are our processes. But they are not. But again, the interaction is there.

I'm new to the company and have never seen it like this before. They have always passed audits like this, it just doesn't seem to fit. Should we not have specific maps, specifically for each process? Or does it matter, so long as the interactions are there? Does anyone have any advice or suggestions that can help? It would be greatly appreciated for any insight.

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 4th December 2017, 06:18 PM
Sidney Vianna's Avatar
Sidney Vianna

 
 
Total Posts: 9,274
re: AS9100D Process Map Requirements - PEAR Forms

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Mjtaur View Post

It would be greatly appreciated for any insight.
I suspect this is an outcome of auditor laziness. During the flowdown of the PEAR forms, some external auditors thought it would be a good idea to (ARTIFICIALLY and UNILATERALLY) reduce the number of (product realization) process so they would have to fill out fewer forms.

The process is supposed to work the other way around, i.e., the organization is supposed to identify it's product realization QMS processes and the auditor is supposed to develop PEAR's for them. But many external auditors shortcut the processes to make their lives easier. Some auditors even outsource the filling-out of the AS9101 forms to the clients, in some cases, what totally contravenes the idea of a 3rd party auditor doing his/her job. A little travesty, but the reality for some of the AEA's out there. Not all, but some.

Last edited by Sidney Vianna; 5th December 2017 at 07:54 PM.
Thanks to Sidney Vianna for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #3  
Old 5th December 2017, 06:21 PM
Mjtaur

 
 
Total Posts: 21
Re: AS9100D Process Map Requirements - PEAR Forms

I definitely see your point. We are getting a new auditor. My ultimate fear is that they will not see it in the way our previous CB has see (or done). That they will look at our process maps, look at our PEARs for our internal audit and say, "Nope. They don't match." Major.

I really don't know if this is acceptable and not really sure what to do about it.
  Post Number #4  
Old 5th December 2017, 06:56 PM
Sidney Vianna's Avatar
Sidney Vianna

 
 
Total Posts: 9,274
Re: AS9100D Process Map Requirements - PEAR Forms

You can use the PEAR for your internal audits, should you want to do so, but it is not a requirement.

The PEAR form is a requirement for the CB audits. They, the CB auditors, have to complete the form as part of the AS9101 audit process and upload them on to OASIS.

If the new auditor decides to create more PEAR forms to reflect your product realizations processes, that's exactly what s/he should be doing.
  Post Number #5  
Old 6th December 2017, 02:15 AM
dsanabria

 
 
Total Posts: 1,332
Re: AS9100D Process Map Requirements - PEAR Forms

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Mjtaur View Post

Hello all,

This might sound like a ridiculous question but here is the scenario:

Company has three processes: Management, Manufacturing and Purchasing.

Only Manufacturing and Purchasing have PEARs.

However, the QM process maps ARE interactions of all activities, but not titled, nor are the specifically just Manufacturing, Management or Purchasing. As a matter of fact, they are titled Quality Process map, Manufacturing Process map and Detailed Manufacturing Process Map. This leads me to believe those are our processes. But they are not. But again, the interaction is there.

I'm new to the company and have never seen it like this before. They have always passed audits like this, it just doesn't seem to fit. Should we not have specific maps, specifically for each process? Or does it matter, so long as the interactions are there? Does anyone have any advice or suggestions that can help? It would be greatly appreciated for any insight.
You need to look at your process and define it - flowchart works great but use your style. Identify the core processes and keep it simple (small shops can, large ones are more complex).

Identify the Core processes (hint Clause 8) with actual name, i.e. sales, purchasing, engineering, manufacturing - or what ever is applicable to your site. Establish reachable goals and monitor its performance.

3rd party auditors usually flow that process.

If you want - you could post it here for feedback.
Thanks to dsanabria for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #6  
Old 6th December 2017, 11:56 AM
Mjtaur

 
 
Total Posts: 21
Re: AS9100D Process Map Requirements - PEAR Forms

Quote:
You need to look at your process and define it - flowchart works great but use your style. Identify the core processes and keep it simple (small shops can, large ones are more complex).

Identify the Core processes (hint Clause 8) with actual name, i.e. sales, purchasing, engineering, manufacturing - or what ever is applicable to your site. Establish reachable goals and monitor its performance.

3rd party auditors usually flow that process.

If you want - you could post it here for feedback.
We've identified the core processes of Manufacturing, Purchasing and Management. Their metrics are simple. Their interactions are found within the aforementioned process maps. However, the process maps have different nomenclature. My ultimate worry is that the auditor will say we have a conflict here because those are maps of "different processes," of which, should they be given KPIs? Basically, the maps and the processes we actually have, have different names, though our actual processes do have KPIs and are stated in Section 4.4.1c of our QM. Thoughts?
  Post Number #7  
Old 6th December 2017, 12:07 PM
dsanabria

 
 
Total Posts: 1,332
Re: AS9100D Process Map Requirements - PEAR Forms

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Mjtaur View Post

We've identified the core processes of Manufacturing, Purchasing and Management. Their metrics are simple. Their interactions are found within the aforementioned process maps. However, the process maps have different nomenclature. My ultimate worry is that the auditor will say we have a conflict here because those are maps of "different processes," of which, should they be given KPIs? Basically, the maps and the processes we actually have, have different names, though our actual processes do have KPIs and are stated in Section 4.4.1c of our QM. Thoughts?
Please explain what management does to the product and how they add value to it - how does the CFO, President, marketing, it add value to the product.

Core processes are part of Clause 8 - management is not in clause 8.

However, if you want to measure their effectiveness - good luck! an excellent exercise in futility.

If you can - can you post your process flowchart?
  Post Number #8  
Old 6th December 2017, 12:47 PM
Mjtaur

 
 
Total Posts: 21
Re: AS9100D Process Map Requirements - PEAR Forms

Quote:
If you can - can you post your process flowchart?
I would, but I'm not allowed to. It's a non-PEAR for our auditor, anyway. I guess they could look into MRMs, resources and continuous improvement in the context of planning our QMS and/or changes to our QMS and how that effects products - I haven't been involved in our previous audits, so I don't really know where our CB was going with it. The CB just listed it on the PMR as a process on our last audit.

Our "Main" Overview Flowchart goes from Creating a Quote/Contract Review, through Manufacturing to the Customer. Just general steps. Really generic. Which is good, because we are a small shop, anyway.

Then we have a "Detailed Manufacturing Process Flowchart," which just gets into more detail with manufacturing. I agree with this one, and think there is no problem. It's even referenced in our "Main" process flowchart.

Then comes the "Quality Process Flowchart." This starts with our Customers into Customer surveys/feedback to vendors/suppliers selection, to Top Management(and their actions), quality improvements, audits/corrective actions - more like a QA sort of aspect (we have never had a PEAR given on QA process and don't know why, given this "Process Map" for Quality. In either case, we don't otherwise state this as a "Process" with KPIs (continuous improvements/CA, so on and so forth). This sounds like where our CB was getting at with our Management "Process." Everything flows to and from, back and forth, to "Top Management Review and Actions." Like it's the center of the Quality Process Map.

I hope this semi explanation is good enough to stir some thought. I just don't really know if I need to scrap these flowcharts and strictly make flowcharts that are titled and specific to our "established" processes.

However, all of the interactions of our processes can be found on these flowcharts, even though they have different names, if you look for them. So, I'm not sure if I need to scrap them or not. I could just be too worried about what the auditor "wants," because we will be meeting them for the first time this go-round.

It looks as though our previous CB only went off of the "main" flowchart, as the auditor depicted in block 16 of the PEARs from previous years. He just copied and pasted the flowchart into that block for both PEAR processes. I suppose that was good enough for him.

Last edited by Mjtaur; 6th December 2017 at 01:21 PM. Reason: add information about flowcharts
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > > >

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
AS9100D production process scheduling requirements kylerf Internal Auditing 14 11th December 2017 10:47 PM
Maintenance requirements for Production Equipment in AS9100D kylerf General Auditing Discussions 8 8th November 2017 01:59 PM
PEAR (Process Effectiveness Assessment Report) Requirements for AS9100 Registration Quality Bryan AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 4 15th January 2014 10:24 PM
AS9100C PEAR (Process Effectiveness Assessment Report) for Design and Development dwend AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 6 18th February 2012 05:48 PM
Relevance of Process Based Auditing (PEAR) to regulated industry. v9991 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 3 25th November 2011 11:09 PM



The time now is 02:50 PM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



Misc. Internal Links


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"
The Elsmar Cove web site and all content is owned by Rabbithash Corp. as of 1 MAY 2018.
Unlike Facebook and other properties such as Linkedin, We don't buy, sell, or "share" visitor information. Never have, Never will...
GDPR Compliant since 1996, keeping Marc's vision alive!