The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > > >
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

CB and Internal auditors most common nonconformities against AS9100D

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Courtesy Quick Links


Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services


Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC



International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

AIAG - Automotive Industry Action Group

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Organization for Standardization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags
as9100 revision d (2016), audits and auditing, iso 9001:2015, transition audits
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 16th January 2018, 10:47 AM
Mjtaur

 
 
Total Posts: 21
Let Me Help You CB and Internal auditors most common nonconformities against AS9100D

CB and Internal auditors, what are your most common findings for AS9100D? Let's just say a small machine shop that excludes design, or similar.

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 16th January 2018, 12:50 PM
dsanabria

 
 
Total Posts: 1,369
re: CB and Internal auditors most common nonconformities against AS9100D

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Mjtaur View Post

CB and Internal auditors, what are your most common findings for AS9100D? Let's just say a small machine shop that excludes design, or similar.
Not sure how we can help you in your question - can you rephrase your concern or question?
  Post Number #3  
Old 16th January 2018, 12:55 PM
Mjtaur

 
 
Total Posts: 21
re: CB and Internal auditors most common nonconformities against AS9100D

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by dsanabria View Post

Not sure how we can help you in your question - can you rephrase your concern or question?
I suppose I could say it as, what are small, excluded design shops running into concerning findings? Are there any common findings that are being seen from place to place? Are there areas that aren't commonly well understood by companies, that might be a pattern?

Sent from my N9560 using Tapatalk
  Post Number #4  
Old 16th January 2018, 01:03 PM
dsanabria

 
 
Total Posts: 1,369
re: CB and Internal auditors most common nonconformities against AS9100D

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Mjtaur View Post

I suppose I could say it as, what are small, excluded design shops running into concerning findings? Are there any common findings that are being seen from place to place? Are there areas that aren't commonly well understood by companies, that might be a pattern?

Sent from my N9560 using Tapatalk
To my knowledge - most auditors are writing NCR on the AS9100C - not too many on AS9100D as it is vaguely written and hard to point out issues with it.
Thanks to dsanabria for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #5  
Old 16th January 2018, 01:52 PM
Sidney Vianna's Avatar
Sidney Vianna

 
 
Total Posts: 9,319
Angry re: CB and Internal auditors most common nonconformities against AS9100D

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by dsanabria View Post

To my knowledge - most auditors are writing NCR on the AS9100C - not too many on AS9100D as it is vaguely written and hard to point out issues with it.
Thanks for your candor. And, because I believe your perception is correct and representative of the whole conformity assessment sector, it just gives more evidence to my line of thought that, it does not matter what "new requirements" a revised standard brings. Unless the conformity assessment practices make the system accountable to the requirements, such requirements don't exist, for all practical purposes.

That's why, it does not matter if a revision of the standard has "beefed up" requirements about the role of the organization's leadership in the system. If auditors (internal and external) are afraid of interviewing top management and asking them the tough questions they should be asked, for all practical purposes, top management is given a pass they don't deserve. What good does it make for a standard to have additional requirements if the auditors don't keep the organization accountable to them?

That's why, repeating myself for the nth time, the failure to devise conformity assessment practices and develop conformity assessment practitioners in a way that they assess systems under the new context, revising standards is a wasted effort. How ISO CASCO fails to see (and ACT) on that, is astounding, in my opinion.
Thanks to Sidney Vianna for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #6  
Old 16th January 2018, 07:02 PM
AndyN's Avatar
AndyN

 
 
Total Posts: 9,118
Lightbulb Re: CB and Internal auditors most common nonconformities against AS9100D

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by dsanabria View Post

To my knowledge - most auditors are writing NCR on the AS9100C - not too many on AS9100D as it is vaguely written and hard to point out issues with it.
Why? Shouldn't they be auditing the client's QMS? If the client has paid out how they comply to each clause of AS9100D, what's the problem with doesn't the audit to see if they are implementing it and that it's effective? Have the CB rules changed? Isn't that the purpose of the 2 stage CB process? Stage 1 confirms the QMS complies with the standard, stage 2 audits the QMS for implementation and effectiveness...

What's changed?
  Post Number #7  
Old 16th January 2018, 08:09 PM
dsanabria

 
 
Total Posts: 1,369
Re: CB and Internal auditors most common nonconformities against AS9100D

What's changed?[/QUOTE]

The AS9100D has become vague and overreaching without a clear path for anyone to follow.
  Post Number #8  
Old 17th January 2018, 12:38 PM
Mjtaur

 
 
Total Posts: 21
Re: CB and Internal auditors most common nonconformities against AS9100D

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by dsanabria View Post

What's changed?
The AS9100D has become vague and overreaching without a clear path for anyone to follow.[/QUOTE]

Your company shall do X, Y & Z, and have evidence of being able to do it, as your company sees fit...
Thanks to Mjtaur for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > > >

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
AS9100D Internal Audit (9.2) Example wanted john gault AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 11 12th May 2017 04:52 PM
Do all findings (nonconformities) in an internal audit require a corrective action? MrOctober Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 55 22nd December 2014 08:53 PM
Should internal auditors be compulsorily certified as internal auditors ? Reeta Internal Auditing 11 3rd September 2014 08:37 AM
Need help identifying nonconformities in internal audits Jewel232520 Internal Auditing 2 13th June 2010 02:31 PM
Does ISO 9001:2000 require Internal Auditors to take a Lead Auditors course? Stuart Andrews Internal Auditing 2 17th October 2002 12:51 PM



The time now is 02:49 PM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



Misc. Internal Links


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"