QualityStandardsGirl
Starting to get Involved
We just went through our AS9120B upgrade audit and got a non-conformance on Clause 8.4.1.1 The organization has not fully maintained a register of external providers that includes the scope of approval.
We had our approved external providers listed as Supplier (distributors), Vendor (repair vendors), Both (Supplier & Repair Vendor) or Non-Aviation. The auditor said that didn't break it down far enough. We are wondering how far you need to break down the scope of approval. Would it be ok to say the vendor is approved for Engine repairs or airframe repairs or does it need to be more in depth than that?
I tried looking at some of our customer's AVL and I am finding all different things.
We had our approved external providers listed as Supplier (distributors), Vendor (repair vendors), Both (Supplier & Repair Vendor) or Non-Aviation. The auditor said that didn't break it down far enough. We are wondering how far you need to break down the scope of approval. Would it be ok to say the vendor is approved for Engine repairs or airframe repairs or does it need to be more in depth than that?
I tried looking at some of our customer's AVL and I am finding all different things.