V
VMartin
During are last assessment audit, we were notified about a new intrepretation from AIAG, dated 3/21/2000.
A supplier's registration will be placed on immediate probation if....
Minor non-conformance corrective action is verified by the Registrar as not being effectively implemented with 60 days of the date identified; minor non-conformance closure may require on-site verification by the Registrar.
Interpretation of this new requirement was all AR's from previous audit, had to be verified as effective and closed within 60 days, if not "Major" would be issued. No time lines would be accepted. If evidence could not be supplied to show closure, a lead auditor from our registrar would be sent to do an onsite verification.
I'm not sure that all AR's can be verified as effective within the time frame given. Just wanted to get some communication going on this new interpretation, so that no one else was caught off guard.
[This message has been edited by VMartin (edited 25 May 2000).]
A supplier's registration will be placed on immediate probation if....
Minor non-conformance corrective action is verified by the Registrar as not being effectively implemented with 60 days of the date identified; minor non-conformance closure may require on-site verification by the Registrar.
Interpretation of this new requirement was all AR's from previous audit, had to be verified as effective and closed within 60 days, if not "Major" would be issued. No time lines would be accepted. If evidence could not be supplied to show closure, a lead auditor from our registrar would be sent to do an onsite verification.
I'm not sure that all AR's can be verified as effective within the time frame given. Just wanted to get some communication going on this new interpretation, so that no one else was caught off guard.
[This message has been edited by VMartin (edited 25 May 2000).]