The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums
One Sided Tolerance Distribution(s)
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
One Sided Tolerance Distribution(s)
One Sided Tolerance Distribution(s)
One Sided Tolerance Distribution(s)
One Sided Tolerance Distribution(s)
One Sided Tolerance Distribution(s)
One Sided Tolerance Distribution(s)
One Sided Tolerance Distribution(s)
One Sided Tolerance Distribution(s)
One Sided Tolerance Distribution(s)
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > >
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

One Sided Tolerance Distribution(s)


Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services


Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC



International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

AIAG - Automotive Industry Action Group

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Organization for Standardization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags
cpk (related to process capability), distribution (statistics), normal distribution, unilateral dimensional tolerances
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 27th April 2013, 03:06 AM
Uchiha

 
 
Total Posts: 23
Please Help! One Sided Tolerance Distribution(s)

Hello everyone,

First many thanks for the incredible job done here. This is my first post, but this forum already helped many times before today...

I know the question of process capability for one sided tolerance characteristics was discussed before (maybe more than once). However, there is still something bothering me that I can't figure out. It's not only about how to calculate the capability though...

The following are my personal conclusions, so please correct me if I am wrong:
There are two types of characteristics with one sided tolerance:

1- With natural "limit": for example perpendicularity or flatness. These cannot have a value less than 0 and therefore have only the upper tolerance. These characteristics should follow a folded normal distribution. Right?

2- Without natural "limit", but rather with only one actual specification: for example tensile strength which should not be less than X MPa (lower tolerance), but that can go up to whatever value possible. These characteristics should follow a normal distribution, right? Or is there any other specific distribution for these cases (one sided normal distribution for example)?

Is the Cpk calculated the same way in both cases anyway? And is the calculation based on the same dispersion used for normal distribution (3*sigma)?

Once again, thanks for the great job.
Uchiha

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 29th April 2013, 05:01 AM
Stijloor's Avatar
Stijloor

 
 
Total Posts: 15,335
Re: One Sided Tolerance Distribution(s)

A Quick Bump!

Can someone help?

Thank you very much!
  Post Number #3  
Old 29th April 2013, 07:54 AM
Miner's Avatar
Miner

 
 
Total Posts: 4,334
Look! Re: One Sided Tolerance Distribution(s)

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Uchiha View Post

There are two types of characteristics with one sided tolerance:

1- With natural "limit": for example perpendicularity or flatness. These cannot have a value less than 0 and therefore have only the upper tolerance. These characteristics should follow a folded normal distribution. Right?
Not necessarily. If the "natural limit" is artificial, such as Position where you are using the (polar) absolute value of the x/y coordinates that may actually be negative, or flatness that does not distinguish between concave/convex then you will likely have a folded distribution. However, if the natural limit is real as you would get by machining to a hard stop, you would be more likely to get a lognormal or similar distribution.

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Uchiha View Post

2- Without natural "limit", but rather with only one actual specification: for example tensile strength which should not be less than X MPa (lower tolerance), but that can go up to whatever value possible. These characteristics should follow a normal distribution, right? Or is there any other specific distribution for these cases (one sided normal distribution for example)?
The tensile strength distributions that I have worked with have all tended to be skewed. By theory, they should follow a smallest extreme value (i.e., weakest link) distribution.

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Uchiha View Post

Is the Cpk calculated the same way in both cases anyway? And is the calculation based on the same dispersion used for normal distribution (3*sigma)?
No. You should perform a non-normal capability study.

Some would advise that you transform your data using a Box-Cox transform, but I do not recommend this. I work with the native distribution.
Thanks to Miner for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #4  
Old 29th April 2013, 09:21 AM
bobdoering's Avatar
bobdoering

 
 
Total Posts: 4,089
Re: One Sided Tolerance Distribution(s)

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Uchiha View Post

1- With natural "limit": for example perpendicularity or flatness. These cannot have a value less than 0 and therefore have only the upper tolerance. These characteristics should follow a folded normal distribution. Right?
Typically, through distribution fitting, I find the most typical disttributions for one-sided physical limit tolerances to be beta or Weibull distributions.

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Uchiha View Post

2- Without natural "limit", but rather with only one actual specification: for example tensile strength which should not be less than X MPa (lower tolerance), but that can go up to whatever value possible. These characteristics should follow a normal distribution, right? Or is there any other specific distribution for these cases (one sided normal distribution for example)?
There really is no location-specific capability (as in Cpk or Ppk) for one-sided distribution, as the whole point of their existence is to determine if the mean of the distribution is near the center of the tolerance. However, the center is not the goal of a one-sided tolerance, so the point is moot and nonsensical. You can use Cp or Pp.

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Uchihi View Post

Is the Cpk calculated the same way in both cases anyway? And is the calculation based on the same dispersion used for normal distribution (3*sigma)?
No, Cpk is not applicable to either. Cp or Pp can be calculated via transformation.
  Post Number #5  
Old 29th April 2013, 01:14 PM
Bev D's Avatar
Bev D

 
 
Total Posts: 3,605
Re: One Sided Tolerance Distribution(s)

Why even do distribution based Cp/Pp/Cpk/Ppk? why not just plot your data in time sequence against the specificaiton limits? this will tell you how 'capable' you are. If you are producing defects, a simpel defect rate calculation should be sufficient to quantify the 'incapability'. What infromation will you derive from a "CPpk" calculation? what actions will it drive? Is it really worth all of the time spent figuring out how to calculate it? isn't it better to spend your time in actually improving the capabilty? just a thought...
Thank You to Bev D for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #6  
Old 29th April 2013, 01:38 PM
bobdoering's Avatar
bobdoering

 
 
Total Posts: 4,089
Re: One Sided Tolerance Distribution(s)

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Bev D View Post

Why even do distribution based Cp/Pp/Cpk/Ppk? Why not just plot your data in time sequence against the specification limits? This will tell you how 'capable' you are.
I agree. Once the process is in place, it is more about what happens over time. In fact, a correctly implemented SPC charting method would be even better, if applicable.

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Bev D View Post

What information will you derive from a "Cpk" calculation? What actions will it drive? Is it really worth all of the time spent figuring out how to calculate it? Isn?t it better to spend your time in actually improving the capability? just a thought...
That's correct. In fact, in precision machining capability is a constant...no need to continue to calculate.

If the supplier is not sophisticated or lacks resources for data tracking, there is one easy way around the issue. Cut back the spec to 75% of the original spec. Perform you incoming verification to the full spec, and a lot of problems should disappear. There is a statistical justification for this based on the total variance equation, but without going into all of that, it should improve your issues.
Thanks to bobdoering for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > >

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
One sided tolerance Cylindricity - Result from MSA Black arrow Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 10 14th October 2013 08:03 AM
How do you specify a one sided tolerance for an MSA in Minitab v 16 Black arrow Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 6 8th October 2013 11:16 AM
Converting 1-Sided Design Tolerance to a Bilateral Tolerance abhipatel Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 8 11th June 2012 02:13 PM
Gauge R&R %Tolerance Template for One-sided Tolerance - Wire Pull Tester Calibrator24 Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3 25th August 2010 01:28 AM
One-Sided Tolerance Gage R&R Analysis darkafar Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1 14th September 2006 07:27 AM



The time now is 05:08 PM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



Misc. Internal Links


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"