I am in the process of revising our EMS manual to address the 2015 version requirements.
Our 2004 manual was laid out so that each element was addressed individually in the same order as listed in the standard. That is how I intended to revise our manual but I have also seen examples of others that have a much less structured manual. These do not list the elements at all but rather provide the scope and policy and then touch on some of the other requirements of an EMS such as Management Responsibilities, resources, operations control, and checking.
Looking for input as to whether auditors would prefer to see each element addressed in the manual or would they prefer just a general overview of the companies EMS system.
Thanks,
Kim
Our 2004 manual was laid out so that each element was addressed individually in the same order as listed in the standard. That is how I intended to revise our manual but I have also seen examples of others that have a much less structured manual. These do not list the elements at all but rather provide the scope and policy and then touch on some of the other requirements of an EMS such as Management Responsibilities, resources, operations control, and checking.
Looking for input as to whether auditors would prefer to see each element addressed in the manual or would they prefer just a general overview of the companies EMS system.
Thanks,
Kim