The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums
Companies with No SIGNIFICANT Environmental Aspects - ISO 14001
Please read this thread...
Software update
Companies with No SIGNIFICANT Environmental Aspects - ISO 14001
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > >
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Companies with No SIGNIFICANT Environmental Aspects - ISO 14001 - Page 16

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Courtesy Quick Links


Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services


Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC



International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

AIAG - Automotive Industry Action Group

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Organization for Standardization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags
environmental impact, iso 14001 - environmental management systems, small companies (small businesses), aspects and impacts (environmental)
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  Post Number #121  
Old 29th June 2010, 11:45 AM
John Broomfield's Avatar
John Broomfield

 
 
Total Posts: 2,630
Lightbulb Re: Companies with No SIGNIFICANT Environmental Aspects - ISO 14001

All,

After determining all of the activities and by-products that could have and adverse or beneficial impact on the environment no matter what the organization does it will have some environmental aspects that are more significant in their impacts when compared with the others.

The most significant aspects can then influence the setting of objectives and targets and the operational controls.

Companies can draw their line of significance at whatever level of environmental impact they want. Normally I advise drawing the line fairly high at first to focus on limiting adverse impacts and increaing beneficial impacts.

One of each is advisable so client is not just doing less that is bad but also more that is good for the environment.

Having used the management system to achieve the earlier objectives the line of significance can be drawn lower and lower. Indeed, in a mature system this would be welcome evidence of continual improvement.

I cannot imagine a day when all that we do has no adverse or beneficial impact on the environment.

John

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #122  
Old 30th June 2010, 12:54 AM
samsung's Avatar
samsung

 
 
Total Posts: 1,431
Re: Companies with No SIGNIFICANT Environmental Aspects - ISO 14001

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by John Broomfield View Post

I cannot imagine a day when all that we do has no adverse or beneficial impact on the environment.
John
Yet I would say that our acts do more harm than good to the environment we are living in.
  Post Number #123  
Old 11th June 2015, 08:08 AM
5battenburg5

 
 
Total Posts: 3
Re: Companies with No SIGNIFICANT Environmental Aspects - ISO 14001

Hi all,

New member here - though it would be better to post in an existing thread in the first instance (even one that hasn't been active for a few years!) so apologies if it would be more appropriate to start a new thread. I may start a more general thread too, but this seems like an appropriate place for this particular question.

I work at a small (<15 people) office-based company. We're currently in the process of implementing an Environmental Management System which we hope can be certified to ISO 14001. This has been on the cards for a number of years but has always been pushed back in favour of other work so I'm trying to tie everything together to finally get the EMS in place.

This thread is of particular interest because, on the points scoring system we are using (which has come from a template, so the score thresholds were not defined by us) we have no significant environmental impacts. However, there are still a few things that we would like to improve on. So, in our procedure for defining significant aspects, I've added some text to say that even if an aspect is not formally deemed significant, we may still decide to have an aspect control sheet (and associated objectives and improvement programme) if we feel we can reduce our impact in relation to that aspect. So, things like reducing electricity consumption or encouraging people to cycle to work.

I'm now going through the Standard to check we're covered on everything and arrive at clause 4.5.1 for having a monitoring and measurement procedure for your significant aspects. My question is, do you think I need a formal procedure for this, given that the aspects which we're going to try and improve are not formally significant in our system? In reality, the only really quantifiable aspect we're going to have is electricity usage, so is it proportionate for me to have a write a procedure for for contacting the office service company to obtain our meter readings and recording them on a spreadsheet? I'm trying to keep things simple to start with. so I don't want to have to create additional paperwork whilst the System is still in the early stages and just bedding in.


Any advice much appreciated. And as an aside, stumbling across this website has been a massive help – its incredibly useful to see the opinions of others who are actually Environmental Managers rather than having to try and interpret the guidance on my own.


Cheers!
  Post Number #124  
Old 11th June 2015, 09:07 AM
RoxaneB's Avatar
RoxaneB

 
 
Total Posts: 3,013
Re: Companies with No SIGNIFICANT Environmental Aspects - ISO 14001

Congrats on your first post 5battenburg5 and welcome!

Without knowing all the details of your company or the template, why can't you simply change the thresholds? This will then identify those "significant" items. The template was designed to be generic and just because it works for one company does not mean that it will work for all.

It's also part of continual improvement - as processes become more stable (and improved), what was once significant may end up "losing" that designation, and you can now focus on the next big item(s).
  Post Number #125  
Old 12th June 2015, 05:45 AM
5battenburg5

 
 
Total Posts: 3
Re: Companies with No SIGNIFICANT Environmental Aspects - ISO 14001

Thanks RCBeyette.

Adjusting the thresholds is certainly an option. We currently have two aspects - electricity usage and waste - which are just below being significant so adjusting the banding slightly would change the category on those. I suppose it's a case of what's significant to us, and in the grand scheme of what we do then these would be the most significant things.

I've just started a new thread which explains a bit more about the company I work at and a few of the issues I'm encountering. Any additional advice or info much appreciated!
  Post Number #126  
Old 12th June 2015, 07:48 AM
John Broomfield's Avatar
John Broomfield

 
 
Total Posts: 2,630
Yin Yang Re: Companies with No SIGNIFICANT Environmental Aspects - ISO 14001

Battenburg,

I understand you have put your aspects through an off-the-shelf tool for determining significance.

The tool's default criteria for determining significance may be set for organizations that pollute more than yours.

You should input your own criteria for determining significance and do not forget your aspects with beneficial impacts.

Then you will have a logical force for setting objectives, targets, controls and improvements in accordance with your environmental policy.

John
  Post Number #127  
Old 19th June 2015, 05:51 PM
Helmut Jilling

 
 
Total Posts: 4,380
Re: Companies with No SIGNIFICANT Environmental Aspects - ISO 14001

Just to be clear, it is the expectation of ISO 14001 that each company identify those aspects which are more significant than others, as part of continual improvement. ANAB wrote an Accreditation Rule 7 which addresses this, and there are several guidance documents as well. Otherwise, the system would be rather stagnant.
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > >

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Format for Significant Environmental Aspects Study Sennayagi ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8 4th March 2014 09:35 PM
ISO is certified to ISO 14001:2004 - What are their Significant Environmental Aspects Reg Morrison Environmental Related Standards 2 4th October 2013 04:57 AM
Static Significant Environmental Aspects (ISO 14001 Aspects and Impacts) Specky Environmental Related Standards 5 24th January 2011 03:19 PM
Communicate externally about significant environmental aspects - Clause 4.4.3 Omeil Environmental Related Standards 6 7th December 2008 10:18 PM
The Number of Significant Environmental Aspects and Environmental Goals Falken Environmental Related Standards 5 7th December 2007 02:52 AM



The time now is 09:00 PM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



Misc. Internal Links


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"