The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums
Testing a US device in Europe to prove Equivalence in a ?head-to-head? Study
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Testing a US device in Europe to prove Equivalence in a ?head-to-head? Study
Testing a US device in Europe to prove Equivalence in a ?head-to-head? Study
Testing a US device in Europe to prove Equivalence in a ?head-to-head? Study
Testing a US device in Europe to prove Equivalence in a ?head-to-head? Study
Testing a US device in Europe to prove Equivalence in a ?head-to-head? Study
Testing a US device in Europe to prove Equivalence in a ?head-to-head? Study
Testing a US device in Europe to prove Equivalence in a ?head-to-head? Study
Testing a US device in Europe to prove Equivalence in a ?head-to-head? Study
Testing a US device in Europe to prove Equivalence in a ?head-to-head? Study
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > > >
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Testing a US device in Europe to prove Equivalence in a ?head-to-head? Study


Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services


Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC



International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

AIAG - Automotive Industry Action Group

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Organization for Standardization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags
clinical trials and studies and investigations, equivalence studies, gcp (good clinical practices) for drugs and medical devices, 510(k), medical devices
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 4th July 2012, 06:31 AM
pschnoor9

 
 
Total Posts: 12
Please Help! Testing a US device in Europe to prove Equivalence in a “head-to-head” Study

We have identified a US device as our predicate for a medical device being produced in Europe. In order to prove equivalence in a “head-to-head” study, we would like to bring some of these devices to Europe for testing.

Is there anyone with knowledge or experience regarding clinical studies (not trials) that involve the use in Europe of a non-CE marked device from the US? These devices will not be put on the market in Europe and will remain the property of our company. Also, the agreement with the study participants will follow GCP, including the requirement for return of the device at the end of the study.

Is it appropriate to use the 510k clearance of the US device as a basis for a “safe to use” claim?

Any advice or guidance is appreciated.

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 7th July 2012, 09:20 AM
Stijloor's Avatar
Stijloor

 
 
Total Posts: 15,335
Re: Testing a US device in Europe to prove Equivalence in a “head-to-head” Study

A Quick Bump!

Can someone help?

Thank you very much!!
  Post Number #3  
Old 8th July 2012, 10:31 AM
c.mitch's Avatar
c.mitch

 
 
Total Posts: 175
Hello,

I answer you because I saw the quick bump! Perhaps other guys could give more information.
Clinical trials with MD that are not CE marked are regulated by article 15 of 93/42 EC directive. To do so, you shall build a technical file according to annex VII and ask the authorization to do clinical tests to the ethical commitee of the country where you want to do the tests.
The technical file should be easy to build, picking up data from your Fda clearance. The authorization should be easy or hard to obtain, depending on the "mood" of the authority.
Thank You to c.mitch for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #4  
Old 8th July 2012, 10:33 AM
c.mitch's Avatar
c.mitch

 
 
Total Posts: 175
Sorry there is a typo in my last post: annex VIII, not VII.
  Post Number #5  
Old 9th July 2012, 05:05 AM
PaulGr

 
 
Total Posts: 44
Re: Testing a US device in Europe to prove Equivalence in a “head-to-head” Study

Hi,

From your post it is not clear if the 'identified US device' is your device or a competitors device. If it's the latter, you will have an issue with building the required file (see post of c.mitch) as key documents like the risk analysis and test report will not be directly available.

In that case I would suggest to check if you could proof equivalence based on intended use, technology, specifications from the manual and bench testing or other non-clinical testing.

Or, if you really need the clinical testing, consider running the tests in the US.
Thank You to PaulGr for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #6  
Old 9th July 2012, 06:14 AM
Pads38

 
 
Total Posts: 758
Re: Testing a US device in Europe to prove Equivalence in a “head-to-head” Study

Quote:
clinical studies (not trials)
Quote:
(ISO 14155)Clinical Investigation-
any designed and planned systematic study in human subjects undertaken to verify the safety and/or performance of a specific device.
Any studies that use humans are classed as Clinical Investigations. As c.mitch highlights these are regulated by annex VIII (and annex X). As part of that you will need to have your Clinical Investigation Plan authorised by the Ethics Committee of the institution involved and by the national Competent Authority (in the UK this is the MHRA). Detailed within your plan will need to be descriptions of equipment involved. The use of non-CE marked devices will need to be highlighted.

The authorisation to use such devices will depend upon the risks involved. If the device is marketed in the USA (with FDA clearance) this would give a high degree of confidence that the device would not represent significant unknown risk.
Thanks to Pads38 for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #7  
Old 17th July 2012, 03:54 AM
pschnoor9

 
 
Total Posts: 12
Thank You! Re: Testing a US device in Europe to prove Equivalence in a “head-to-head” Study

Thank you to all three respondents - the information is very helpful. The device is a competitor device, so a technical file is not possible; we have written our rationale for allowing this study, but it seems the biggest concern is the possibility that we will be perceived to be "placing this (non CE marked) device on the market". We have stipulated that we will control access to the devices, but no approval yet.
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > > >

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Bent Hex Head Cap Bolts mbehmazia Manufacturing and Related Processes 5 3rd July 2013 03:34 PM
New to QMS Coordinator Position... Am I in over my head? JaimeB Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 16 6th July 2011 08:54 AM
Clinical Data to Prove Equivalence CPLLC Other US Medical Device Regulations 4 1st July 2010 04:18 PM
Where to Head to Next after Completing ISO9001? Cheryl Lourdes ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11 16th August 2006 08:59 PM



The time now is 01:52 PM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



Misc. Internal Links


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"