According to the IAQG news, the AAQG is working with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) to develop a process to leverage OASIS quality management system performance data to enhance risk-based, Second Party Audit preparation and planning. The FAA will be developing their prototype in 2018 while the DCMA OASIS Initiative is currently being piloted at seven US companies.
It will be interesting to see how OEM's, AB's and CB's react to having regulator representatives involved and close to the process. I, for one, hope the involvement will be collaborative, but also, thorough and, hopefully, weed out some of the less serious players in the certification. A few years ago, we had a concerning report available @ http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf&AD=ADA591268 summarized as
It will be interesting to see how OEM's, AB's and CB's react to having regulator representatives involved and close to the process. I, for one, hope the involvement will be collaborative, but also, thorough and, hopefully, weed out some of the less serious players in the certification. A few years ago, we had a concerning report available @ http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf&AD=ADA591268 summarized as
The F-35 Program did not sufficiently implement or flow down technical and quality management system requirements to prevent the fielding of nonconforming hardware and software. This could adversely affect aircraft performance, reliability, maintainability, and ultimately program cost. Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company (Lockheed Martin) and its subcontractors did not follow disciplined AS9100 Quality Management System practices, as evidenced by 363 findings, which contained 719 issues.