Elsmar Cove Quality DiscussionsProcess vs Elements/Checklist - Is the old method of auditing the clauses still legalThe Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Process vs Elements/Checklist - Is the old method of auditing the clauses still legal
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Process vs Elements/Checklist - Is the old method of auditing the clauses still legal
Process vs Elements/Checklist - Is the old method of auditing the clauses still legal
Process vs Elements/Checklist - Is the old method of auditing the clauses still legal
Process vs Elements/Checklist - Is the old method of auditing the clauses still legal
Process vs Elements/Checklist - Is the old method of auditing the clauses still legal
Process vs Elements/Checklist - Is the old method of auditing the clauses still legal
Process vs Elements/Checklist - Is the old method of auditing the clauses still legal
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > > >
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Process vs Elements/Checklist - Is the old method of auditing the clauses still legal


Elsmar XML RSS Feed
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services


Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC



International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Organization for Standardization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 4.00 average. Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 27th January 2006, 09:40 PM
Pat McGhie

 
 
Total Posts: 45
Question Process vs Elements/Checklist - Is the old method of auditing the clauses still legal

Hello everyone,

a little background, recently transferred to a new company. They are ISO 9001-2000 Certified. Originally, 6 years ago to 1994, renewed 3 years ago and 2 years back upgraded if you will to 9001-2000. They are do for a new certificate audit in a few months.

The situation, they are still performing internal audits to the clauses of the standard with a checklist. They started to look into the process approach to auditing and at the last surveillance audit in October 05, it was listed as an observation that they pursue that approach.

2 issues are now upon me. The first being that they have not done any audits since last july. I am trying to get training in for an audit team on the process approach. My question now, is the old method of auditing to the clauses still legal (as we did not get a non-conformance) or is the process approach mandatory?

Thank you, I searched the forum but could not find the specific. Idea now is get the audits caught up the old way and then proceed to work towards process approach but likely not fully implemented by the 3rd party certificate audit.

Pat McGhie

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 27th January 2006, 09:52 PM
AndyN's Avatar
AndyN

 
 
Total Posts: 8,677
Let Me Help You Nothing 'illegal', but.........

why are you wasting your time 'getting caught up' using the old element approach? - that was a bad approach anyway, even if an external auditor bought it. You are stuck with what it is - a failed audit system. With such a situation an effective external auditor is more likely to issue a major against a lack of management commitment or an ineffective management review, since a key requirement - internal audits - is on it's knees. Paint that picture to your management and get the training course you need, get an on-site 'lab' audit with the instructor (I always recommend that) and use the training session as OJT and as a 'real' audit. The get the internal audit process fixed.

Andy
  Post Number #3  
Old 28th January 2006, 11:31 AM
Helmut Jilling

 
 
Total Posts: 4,366
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Pat McGhie

Hello everyone,

a little background, recently transferred to a new company. They are ISO 9001-2000 Certified. Originally, 6 years ago to 1994, renewed 3 years ago and 2 years back upgraded if you will to 9001-2000. They are do for a new certificate audit in a few months.

The situation, they are still performing internal audits to the clauses of the standard with a checklist. They started to look into the process approach to auditing and at the last surveillance audit in October 05, it was listed as an observation that they pursue that approach.

2 issues are now upon me. The first being that they have not done any audits since last july. I am trying to get training in for an audit team on the process approach. My question now, is the old method of auditing to the clauses still legal (as we did not get a non-conformance) or is the process approach mandatory?

Thank you, I searched the forum but could not find the specific. Idea now is get the audits caught up the old way and then proceed to work towards process approach but likely not fully implemented by the 3rd party certificate audit.

Pat McGhie

You are clearly in a difficult position.

I agree with Andy, you should use the process approach widely being talked about.

However, you should also know, that both the ANAB and the Automotive IAOB expect and require a process approach being applied to your QMS. The TS Rules are pretty clear, if you have automotive exposure.

The ANAB's instructions to the CBs are pretty clear, however, their documents are a bit less direct, but making progress. There is one recent guidance document from ANAB with promotes the process approach. I will attach a copy with this post.
Attached Files: 1. Scan for viruses before opening, 2. Please report any 'bad' files by Reporting this post, 3. Use at your Own Risk.
File Type: doc ANAB Issue61-Outputs Matter- 15November2005.doc (74.0 KB, 601 views)
  Post Number #4  
Old 29th January 2006, 07:41 AM
Pat McGhie

 
 
Total Posts: 45
agree with time waste but...

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by AndyN

why are you wasting your time 'getting caught up' using the old element approach? - that was a bad approach anyway, even if an external auditor bought it. You are stuck with what it is - a failed audit system. With such a situation an effective external auditor is more likely to issue a major against a lack of management commitment or an ineffective management review, since a key requirement - internal audits - is on it's knees. Paint that picture to your management and get the training course you need, get an on-site 'lab' audit with the instructor (I always recommend that) and use the training session as OJT and as a 'real' audit. The get the internal audit process fixed.

Andy

Andy, thank you for the reply... we are not trying to waste our time. I agree with you that it is and we moving forward. We have auditors who have audited nothing as they were all waiting for someone to take some initiative. It has been taken, we are proceeding with the process approach, I already have a quote and my proposal will be to management on Monday... I expect it will be signed the same day based on previous conversations with the owner.

The issue occurs with "catchup". Should we do "something" (which is show some audit prograqm even though element based ) with our current team until the training can be completed and we transition over? My boss is saying that yes, we should as it shows an attempt to maintain while we pursue the improvement.

My real question is would the "non process based" audits (say they were 80% of the program) be legal at our soon to aarive recertification audit. At that point we would be trained, program in place but only a small percent of process based complete.

Pat
  Post Number #5  
Old 29th January 2006, 07:50 AM
Pat McGhie

 
 
Total Posts: 45
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by hjilling

You are clearly in a difficult position.

I agree with Andy, you should use the process approach widely being talked about.
Thank you both for the doc and the reply. We do not have automotive exposure at the moment, the driving guidline is strictly our own ISO 9001-2000.

There is no question on the merits of process approach and we are proceeding. Management is also behind this. The real question is should we continue our element based audits and will they be legal until we comlete the training and transition.

Pat
  Post Number #6  
Old 29th January 2006, 08:32 AM
Jen Kirley's Avatar
Jen Kirley

 
 
Total Posts: 6,093
Hi Pat,

If the overall question is "What should we do to catch up" my question to you is, how often do the audits take place according to the audit procedure? Are you clearly past schedule--lapsed audits?

If you are in non-conformance with your own procedure a CAR may be required to record the discrepancy for your upcoming recert.

I would not perform a flurry of audits just to catch up, using an approach not recommended; I would use this time to ramp up to the process approach.

Is the audit procedure among those out of periodicity? If so, I would do that one first, write a CAR and fix it by ramping up with process audit training and observations of auditors performing the new method.

When a round of the new audits successfully complete, I would do a follow up audit of the audit procedure to close out that CAR.
  Post Number #7  
Old 29th January 2006, 10:42 AM
AndyN's Avatar
AndyN

 
 
Total Posts: 8,677
Thumbs up Or maybe kick Management Review into gear........

and record that management understand the issue. That way, you'll get benefit from showing that management do 'care' (even if only on paper) and that the action Jennifer is suggesting (good one Jen!) is linked to some 'management commitment'. Yes, I know they probably don't fully 'get it', but if we are talking audit survival when your registrar comes in to visit, then do what it takes. I'm thinking that if they've approved some training budget, they will support a realization of the situation. Also, you'll need to look closely at why the audit system has failed. Maybe we can diagnose it here for you?

Andy
  Post Number #8  
Old 29th January 2006, 01:05 PM
Antonio Vieira's Avatar
Antonio Vieira

 
 
Total Posts: 463
Remenber just this.
In all the registrars I know the check list we have to use when auditing a QMS is the standard written in an inquisitive form. So this is a requirement check list. And it has to be that way, as 3rd party audit the main thing we have to check is that all the requirements of the standard are fulfilled.
In an internal audit things are different. In this kind of audit you know that your system is according to that standard and you can check just if what you have written is being correctly done...
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > > >

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Best Method of Auditing an Installation Process at a client job-site azuker ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4 18th May 2015 08:15 AM
Auditing the Task (Process) Elements - Visual Map Attached WALLACE General Auditing Discussions 74 20th August 2014 06:22 AM
Auditing to ISO 9001:2008 Elements EEJen Internal Auditing 3 17th February 2011 12:53 PM
Determining Legal& Statutory requirements while Auditing Design & Development process juliov Design and Development of Products and Processes 8 12th February 2008 06:38 PM
Process based Internal Audits, instead of auditing to the elements of the standard 5litre Internal Auditing 21 18th July 2007 11:56 AM



The time now is 09:25 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



Misc. Internal Links


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"