The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums
Pushback on a Nonconformance Found in a Supplier Audit
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Pushback on a Nonconformance Found in a Supplier Audit
Pushback on a Nonconformance Found in a Supplier Audit
Pushback on a Nonconformance Found in a Supplier Audit
Pushback on a Nonconformance Found in a Supplier Audit
Pushback on a Nonconformance Found in a Supplier Audit
Pushback on a Nonconformance Found in a Supplier Audit
Pushback on a Nonconformance Found in a Supplier Audit
Pushback on a Nonconformance Found in a Supplier Audit
Pushback on a Nonconformance Found in a Supplier Audit
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > > >
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Pushback on a Nonconformance Found in a Supplier Audit


Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services


Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC



International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

AIAG - Automotive Industry Action Group

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Organization for Standardization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags
audit nonconformances and findings, nonconformances, supplier audits
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 11th September 2017, 10:36 AM
GStough's Avatar
GStough

 
 
Total Posts: 1,203
Question Pushback on a Nonconformance Found in a Supplier Audit

During a supplier audit which I led recently, we discovered that the company was not following the procedures they had established in at least 4 instances (4 procedures). When I wrote this up in the audit report as one nonconformance for not following their procedures and citing these 4 instances as the objective evidence, my team leader pushed back and asked why didn't I write it as 4 separate NCs. He thinks it will be easier for the supplier to correct those 4 procedures. My line of thinking is that the supplier should review ALL of their procedures and determine whether they are being followed, not just the 4 that we found.

Which do you think would be the best way to present this finding in the audit report - as one nonconformance or as 4 separate nonconformances (under the same ISO clause)?

TIA!

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 11th September 2017, 10:44 AM
howste's Avatar
howste

 
 
Total Posts: 5,061
Re: Pushback on a Nonconformance Found in a Supplier Audit

Based on what you described, I would probably write one NC. The correction should include all four procedures, but the containment should be much broader to include any & all procedures that need to be updated. The corrective action should address how they will ensure that the procedures and practices match in the future.

I would only write multiple NCs if I thought that there were separate causes for each issue identified.
Thank You to howste for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #3  
Old 11th September 2017, 10:54 AM
qpled

 
 
Total Posts: 93
Re: Pushback on a Nonconformance Found in a Supplier Audit

IMHO, I would go by the supplier's response when you asked them why they were not following those 4 procedures - if the same reason for all 4 (ie., their written procedures have to be updated to reflect best practices) then one NC could be used. If for each of the 4 procedures a different reason was given (ie, additional training needed by new employee for one of the procedures, new revision of procedure not communicated to employees for another procedure, etc...) then 4 NC's could be issued.
Thanks to qpled for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #4  
Old 11th September 2017, 11:02 AM
GStough's Avatar
GStough

 
 
Total Posts: 1,203
Re: Pushback on a Nonconformance Found in a Supplier Audit

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by qpled View Post

IMHO, I would go by the supplier's response when you asked them why they were not following those 4 procedures - if the same reason for all 4 (ie., their written procedures have to be updated to reflect best practices) then one NC could be used. If for each of the 4 procedures a different reason was given (ie, additional training needed by new employee for one of the procedures, new revision of procedure not communicated to employees for another procedure, etc...) then 4 NC's could be issued.
The company had recently undergone some changes and turnover of personnel, and procedures had not been followed. However, the new Quality Manager seems dedicated to getting the QMS back on track, but it will take some time, as his staff is quite small.
Thanks to GStough for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #5  
Old 11th September 2017, 11:10 AM
Ninja's Avatar
Ninja

 
 
Total Posts: 972
Re: Pushback on a Nonconformance Found in a Supplier Audit

Coming from the new QM position...I would ask him what would or would not help him get back on track best.

If 4 just gives him more paperwork and slows him down...write one.
If 4 gives him more leverage with upper management to provide resources...write 8 (kidding...write 4).

From your side, it seems to make little difference...so help his side if possible.
Thank You to Ninja for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #6  
Old 11th September 2017, 11:19 AM
Coury Ferguson's Avatar
Coury Ferguson

 
 
Total Posts: 4,592
Re: Pushback on a Nonconformance Found in a Supplier Audit

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by GStough View Post

During a supplier audit which I led recently, we discovered that the company was not following the procedures they had established in at least 4 instances (4 procedures). When I wrote this up in the audit report as one nonconformance for not following their procedures and citing these 4 instances as the objective evidence, my team leader pushed back and asked why didn't I write it as 4 separate NCs. He thinks it will be easier for the supplier to correct those 4 procedures. My line of thinking is that the supplier should review ALL of their procedures and determine whether they are being followed, not just the 4 that we found.

Which do you think would be the best way to present this finding in the audit report - as one nonconformance or as 4 separate nonconformances (under the same ISO clause)?

TIA!
I agree with Steve. 1 NC should be generated.

As for having the Supplier review all existing procedures for potential change to what they are actually doing. I would also consider any training that was performed to assure that the person or persons not following existing procedures have been trained in one way or another. Also look at possibly identifying, if their procedures requires a annual review of the existing procedures to see if they are applicable to they way they are doing business. This would generate a review of all of their existing procedures, in my opinion.

I think maybe your Team Leader was over zealous.

Last edited by Coury Ferguson; 11th September 2017 at 11:21 AM. Reason: added last sentence
Thank You to Coury Ferguson for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #7  
Old 11th September 2017, 11:24 AM
Sidney Vianna's Avatar
Sidney Vianna

 
 
Total Posts: 9,315
Re: Pushback on a Nonconformance Found in a Supplier Audit

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by GStough View Post

When I wrote this up in the audit report as one nonconformance for not following their procedures and citing these 4 instances as the objective evidence, my team leader pushed back and asked why didn't I write it as 4 separate NCs.
Gidget, I also support your line of thought and your audit team leader is making the mistake of putting himself in the position of the auditee, thinking how to respond to the NC.

However, not to be pedantic, if the audit was using ISO 9001:2015 as a criteria, remember one thing: "failure to follow procedures", technically, is not a requirement in the standard. We even have threads at The Cove discussing this. In my opinion, when an organization is not following their procedures, the real problem, vis a vis the standard is: failure to implement the processes and application of the methods needed to ensure effective operation and control of such processes. That is part of what 4.4.1 and 4.4.1.c) requires in 9001:2015.

I am just saying that, so you are never in a position to respond to auditee who asks you in return: Where does it say anywhere that I have to follow my procedures?

Now the challenge will be to reject the CA when they propose "RETRAINING".
Thank You to Sidney Vianna for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #8  
Old 11th September 2017, 11:50 AM
GStough's Avatar
GStough

 
 
Total Posts: 1,203
Re: Pushback on a Nonconformance Found in a Supplier Audit

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Sidney Vianna View Post

Gidget, I also support your line of thought and your audit team leader is making the mistake of putting himself in the position of the auditee, thinking how to respond to the NC.

However, not to be pedantic, if the audit was using ISO 9001:2015 as a criteria, remember one thing: "failure to follow procedures", technically, is not a requirement in the standard. We even have threads at The Cove discussing this. In my opinion, when an organization is not following their procedures, the real problem, vis a vis the standard is: failure to implement the processes and application of the methods needed to ensure effective operation and control of such processes. That is part of what 4.4.1 and 4.4.1.c) requires in 9001:2015.

I am just saying that, so you are never in a position to respond to auditee who asks you in return: Where does it say anywhere that I have to follow my procedures?

Now the challenge will be to reject the CA when they propose "RETRAINING".
Thanks, Sidney. I should have mentioned that the standard used in the audit was ISO 13485:2003 (they were scheduled for an upgrade audit to 13485:2016 a few weeks after our audit). 4.1 requires that the company establish, document, implement, and maintain a QMS and maintain its effectiveness in accordance with the requirements of said standard.

Oh, don't *EVEN* get me started on the "RETRAINING" as the CA rant!
Thank You to GStough for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > > >

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Nonconformance Found Outside the Audit Scope - Supplier Audit GStough General Auditing Discussions 16 29th April 2017 01:41 PM
Contacting the Supplier's CB vs a Supplier Audit - Nonconformance Problems tabort AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 4 16th January 2014 01:03 PM
External Auditor Findings when an Internal Audit found a Nonconformance Yesterday starfish Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 11 4th November 2010 12:58 PM
What happens if a Major or Minor Nonconformance is found during Surveillance Audit mjflkitty ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4 26th April 2005 08:38 AM
Major/Minor Nonconformity - Nonconformance from last audit found again mjflkitty Nonconformance and Corrective Action 15 8th November 2004 03:53 PM



The time now is 03:17 PM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



Misc. Internal Links


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"