The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums
Performing Internal Calibrations - Dial gauges, micrometers, height gauges, calipers
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Performing Internal Calibrations - Dial gauges, micrometers, height gauges, calipers
Performing Internal Calibrations - Dial gauges, micrometers, height gauges, calipers
Performing Internal Calibrations - Dial gauges, micrometers, height gauges, calipers
Performing Internal Calibrations - Dial gauges, micrometers, height gauges, calipers
Performing Internal Calibrations - Dial gauges, micrometers, height gauges, calipers
Performing Internal Calibrations - Dial gauges, micrometers, height gauges, calipers
Performing Internal Calibrations - Dial gauges, micrometers, height gauges, calipers
Performing Internal Calibrations - Dial gauges, micrometers, height gauges, calipers
Performing Internal Calibrations - Dial gauges, micrometers, height gauges, calipers
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > > >
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Performing Internal Calibrations - Dial gauges, micrometers, height gauges, calipers


Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services


Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC



International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

AIAG - Automotive Industry Action Group

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Organization for Standardization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags
calipers, dial gage, iso 17025 - testing and calibration laboratories, micrometers, uncertainty budget (measurement), height gages, calibration (general topics)
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 12th January 2011, 12:02 PM
jamesmct007

 
 
Total Posts: 4
Please Help! Performing Internal Calibrations - Dial gauges, micrometers, height gauges, calipers

Hi everyone,
I have recently moved into a new job where the compnay is certified to TS 16949. My previous job was in an FDA regulated company so there are a few differences between both that im trying to get my head around.
I have been asked to look after the calibration program within the company. The company has over 200 instruments which are mainly made up of Dial gauges, micrometers, height gauges and calipers. We spend a large amount of money getting an ISO 17025 accredited laboratory in to calibrate these instruments.
What I was hoping was that as we have the experience and personnel to perform these calibrations ourselves and we have our own measuring laboratory (not accredited to ISO 17025) is it possible do these calibrations ourselves with standards that are traceable to ISO 17025.
Is there certain laboratory conditions that need to be met if this can be done. I have procedures available and the personnel are trained on measurement, calibration and uncertainty of measurement and have years of expereince in measurement.
If it is possible to perform these calibrations internally without the lab been accredited to ISO 17025 will we still need to provide an uncertainty measurement?
Any help or information on what options or steps I need to take would be gratefully received. If this question has been answered elsewhere please point me in the right direction. Thanks,
James
Thanks to jamesmct007 for your informative Post and/or Attachment!

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 12th January 2011, 12:53 PM
Sturmkind's Avatar
Sturmkind

 
 
Total Posts: 268
Re: Performing Internal Calibrations - Dial gauges, micrometers, height gauges, calip

Hi, James!

If I understood correctly your instruments are already calibrated/certified by an outside accredited lab. Their certificates should carry the lab's uncertainty estimate.

The AIAG Measurement Systems Analysis manual 4th edition can provide some help and direction. Gregory Gruska, one of the team that wrote this edition and who ran the MSA roll-out training 8/12/10 said 'Calibration is a re-centering of the measurement device. If using stability as a re-calibration decision tool then re-calibration is not needed until such a time as the measurement process drifts out-of-control."

At risk of offending some, the XbarR chart or X-HI/Lo format lends themselves well to evidence ongoing stability.

Example: 0-1" micrometer.
Known areas of wear: Spindle thread, polished spindle anvils.
-The polished spindle anvils can be checked with a certified optical flat for wear periodically.

Choose 2 traceable standard gage blocks (say .1287" and .9782") to encompass most of the usable range.
-(1) chart, subgroup of 3 readings on the same block [0.1287"].
-(1) chart, subgroup of 3 readings on the same block [0.9782"].

Subsequent sub-groups can be used for other 0-1" micrometers. Any one that exhibits an out-of-control condition would then be sent out for re-calibration / refurbishment.

Time interval of charting could be based on usage with those used in continuous production checked very frequently (or even maintaining their own chart).

I have used this method myself (XbarR start of each shift) and it served to show not only stability but also evidenced operator skill at using the gages.

Best of luck!

P.S. The control chart limits for a micrometer that distinguishes to 0.000100" may only be 0.000200" wide. Consequently, the folks doing the inspection have to estimate to the nearest 0.000010". A digital micrometer will likely restrict this to 0.000050".

Last edited by Sturmkind; 12th January 2011 at 01:15 PM. Reason: Add instrument discrimination related to control chart y-axis.
  Post Number #3  
Old 12th January 2011, 01:06 PM
George Weiss

 
 
Total Posts: 444
Re: Performing Internal Calibrations - Dial gauges, micrometers, height gauges, calip

There are several levels of in-house calibrations, verifications, checks and etc.
There is a place for several levels of in-house checks, and cross checks.
The development of an in-house lab has a list of costs attached.
It might be possible to remove some measurement instruments from out-side calibration,
and have them marked as no-cal-required/indication-only.
As previously mentioned, a daily, weekly, monthly in-house check of some indication-only measurement devices is done.
It might be worth some cost analysis, and tool usage evaluations.
Some very low use tools might be stored, and others shared.
Thanks to George Weiss for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #4  
Old 12th January 2011, 01:09 PM
jamesmct007

 
 
Total Posts: 4
Re: Performing Internal Calibrations - Dial gauges, micrometers, height gauges, calip

Thanks Sturmkind for the quick reply.
Using that stability method would be be a good way of determining calibration intervals but before that i really need to know whether I would need to setup an ISO 17025 lab in house or can we just perform calibrations on the above equipment ourselves without accreditation and just have traceability back to ISO 17025.
Thanks,
James
  Post Number #5  
Old 12th January 2011, 01:17 PM
Sturmkind's Avatar
Sturmkind

 
 
Total Posts: 268
Re: Performing Internal Calibrations - Dial gauges, micrometers, height gauges, calip

The TS16949 and your written calibration procedures are sufficient in the world of automotive.
  Post Number #6  
Old 12th January 2011, 01:30 PM
jamesmct007

 
 
Total Posts: 4
Re: Performing Internal Calibrations - Dial gauges, micrometers, height gauges, calip

Thanks george,
I have looked into this and there are a number of instruments that we are looking at making for "indication only" and looking at sharing calibrated instruments rather than everyone having their own calibrated instrument if not needed on a regular basis. This will reduce the cost somewhat but we are still looking at calibrating as much as we can internally especially the above instruments as mentioned as we do have the grade 0 gauge blocks and slip gauges required which are traceable to 17025 calibrated standards. Would you recommend this route of calibrating with written calibration procedures under TS 16949 certification as Sturmkind has suggested?
  Post Number #7  
Old 12th January 2011, 01:58 PM
BradM's Avatar
BradM

 
 
Total Posts: 6,002
Re: Performing Internal Calibrations - Dial gauges, micrometers, height gauges, calip

Here is another thread on this subject:

http://elsmar.com/Forums/showthread.php?t=37750

Stijloor states that you should certainly develop a scope statement.

I am not in the automotive industry, so I can't speak as such to the subject. I would state that while you don't have to pay the money to achieve accreditation under 17025, you should purchase a copy of it and develop a program compliant with the standard. It's a good procedure, and provides a good roadmap to address the management/technical consideration for operating a metrology lab.
  Post Number #8  
Old 12th January 2011, 02:03 PM
George Weiss

 
 
Total Posts: 444
Re: Performing Internal Calibrations - Dial gauges, micrometers, height gauges, calip

This is an expanding process with time/asset costs.
per 16949 7.6.3.1 you can have a lab, and 17025 accreditation is not required.
Are you planning on a room/lab for this, and having a cal-lab develop with some new STDs and temp/RH recorders in-place?
A temperature stabilized room might be found needed for a dimensional calibration area, depending on calibration expectations.
or are you going to bring your gage blocks to the areas of caliper/etc. use, and perform CALs in-house, but field service style?
large & complete In-house labs are a less common in high-tech companies.
If you have the gage blocks, (you do), and other required standards for checking of the calipers and other devices,
then in-house calibrations can be done.
Since many companies just outsource, I would look into exactly what the benifits and costs are.
It is like asking if more government regulations and agencies are good.
A good calibration provider is a nearly fixed cost. A UPS box or a field service call.
It might be that you could provide the calibration provider with a limited use scope for some devices, which would reduce cost.
It is automotive industry practice to have a supplier-guide, and this might be a place for such test limitations.
In-house calibrations will have a person overseeing calibrations, with a raised skill level and resquirements.
Some standards will still need outside service, (gage blocks etc.)
I view in-house calibration processes as a mixed bag.
It places more value on the in-house employee and his effectiveness.
My observation is that bigger business likes to place value on controled processes, and pay the end employee less.
This pushes for outside calibrations to structure costs.
With our ever expanding gobal economies, I am guessing that a very cost compedative calibration lab could setup shop,
and provide a 17025 service from halfway around the world, and have the item back in your hands via UPS/FedX.
The extent of inhouse calibrations would be value, which might slip away with lowering costs in the 17025 life-cycle,
and a sudden shift in your company's structure or priority(s).
A reflection on the use of the in-house calibrations might help. If your company wants to better control the calibration due dates,
and just-in-time calibrations, (which also saves money), over calling in a provider 1-to-2 months early to avoid out-of-cals ocurring.
You described 200 items. Does this mean there are another 200-300 items not being considered for in-house calibration?
The number of items you offer for outside calibration with determine the service contract discount.
You might jack-up the remaining calibration costs, by removing 40-50% of the items. (a real, and hidden cost).
An in-house calibration plus, is the hands on evaluations done by process people.
This is a type of involvement which gains process buy-in.
There is the conflict of interest comment in calibration standards.
Calibrating your equipment in-house sometimes has acceptance bias.
So for me: In the end it seems cheaper in-house, but larger organizations with large calibration provider contracts,
in my area of observation, generally go for the blanket out-sourced calibration. It is my view, from a few observations,
that a small company will try to avoid the costs, ( a large $20,000+ price tag), by doing the work in-house, (with hidden costs).
In-house can lead to lower costs, and if handled well, I believe a better method.
Cross checks, and daily checks can be elevated in a 6month or 1year interval to 17025 aligned/compliant.
Your situation, company, people in place now, all will factor into the will it work well formula.
A univeral guide is doing it cheaper now or loose the business. LEAN-Quality
I write a book, I just put it out there. I hope it has some usefull pieces of guidance/info.

Last edited by George Weiss; 12th January 2011 at 09:46 PM.
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > > >

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Calibration Method of Dial Thermometer Gauges nurhakim General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7 19th February 2014 01:50 AM
Is MSA needed once or once a year for Verniers, Micrometers, Gauges, etc? philip1989 Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 12 8th March 2012 03:02 PM
Calibration of Calipers, Mics, Height gauges - Recommended Gage Block Types Eloy Gomez General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7 24th March 2010 12:41 PM
Room temperature for calibrations on basic equipment like calipers, micrometers, etc. beaser3 General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 14 7th November 2008 02:00 PM
How to calibrate dial indicators, gauges and scales trainee General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 22 5th February 2007 11:56 AM



The time now is 11:37 PM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



Misc. Internal Links


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"
The Elsmar Cove web site and all content is owned by Rabbithash Corp. as of 1 MAY 2018.
Unlike Facebook and other properties such as Linkedin, We don't buy, sell, or "share" visitor information. Never have, Never will...
GDPR Compliant since 1996, keeping Marc's vision alive!