Elsmar Cove Quality DiscussionsRadiated Immunity Device Test Orientations - IEC 61000-4-3The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Radiated Immunity Device Test Orientations - IEC 61000-4-3
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Radiated Immunity Device Test Orientations - IEC 61000-4-3
Radiated Immunity Device Test Orientations - IEC 61000-4-3
Radiated Immunity Device Test Orientations - IEC 61000-4-3
Radiated Immunity Device Test Orientations - IEC 61000-4-3
Radiated Immunity Device Test Orientations - IEC 61000-4-3
Radiated Immunity Device Test Orientations - IEC 61000-4-3
Radiated Immunity Device Test Orientations - IEC 61000-4-3
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > > >
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Radiated Immunity Device Test Orientations - IEC 61000-4-3


Elsmar XML RSS Feed
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services


Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC



International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Organization for Standardization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags
emc (electromagnetic compatibility), iec 61000 - electromagnetic compatibility, immunity tests
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 18th October 2017, 09:56 PM
rothlis

 
 
Total Posts: 27
Please Help! Radiated Immunity Device Test Orientations - IEC 61000-4-3

It appears to be standard practice to test four 90° "side" device orientations during radiated immunity (61000-4-3) and then also the "top" and "bottom" if the device can be used as such. This is reflected in several guidances I've encountered, and is presumably the inference behind clause 8.2 of 61000-4-3, where it says that "all sides shall be exposed ... In other cases, as determined for example by the type and size of EUT or the frequencies of test, more than four azimuths may need to be exposed".

From an electrical perspective, it would make sense to test orientations for all six sides of a cube to ensure all possibly orthogonal fields are covered by at least a 45° angle of incidence, on the assumption that any one wire or circuit in the device could be oriented in any direction and could be vulnerable to interference. So why isn't it standard practice to test all six orientations for every device? Is it because large devices aren't easily tested in the "top" and "bottom" orientations in a typical EMC lab setup?

As I see it, to exclude the "top" and "bottom" orientations is to presume that the real-world interference is never going to originate from a vector above or below the device and, unless I'm missing something, that doesn't seem like a justifiable assumption.

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 7th December 2017, 02:34 PM
phase90

 
 
Total Posts: 14
Re: Radiated Immunity Device Test Orientations - IEC 61000-4-3

What I understand is it relates to the feasibility of testing. If the DUT is a smaller hand-held type of device that can operate in any orientation, it can be tested on all six sides. If it is a unit that cannot be tipped onto its side and operate, then four sides is all you can do. I guess until someone configures a chamber to be 10 meters high and have the antenna above the DUT, that is the reality of what can be done.
Thanks to phase90 for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #3  
Old 7th December 2017, 02:53 PM
rothlis

 
 
Total Posts: 27
Re: Radiated Immunity Device Test Orientations - IEC 61000-4-3

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by phase90 View Post

What I understand is it relates to the feasibility of testing. If the DUT is a smaller hand-held type of device that can operate in any orientation, it can be tested on all six sides. If it is a unit that cannot be tipped onto its side and operate, then four sides is all you can do. I guess until someone configures a chamber to be 10 meters high and have the antenna above the DUT, that is the reality of what can be done.
Thanks for the input. That's what I suspected, but I also perceive tradition has limited testing to four sides whenever top and bottom orientations aren't obviously possible during normal operation, regardless of whether testing is feasible with the device on its side. And it seems to me that 61000-4-3 contributes to this oversight by inferring that four sides is the expected set of orientations, when really that is only appropriate to a minority of devices.
  Post Number #4  
Old 7th December 2017, 03:09 PM
phase90

 
 
Total Posts: 14
Re: Radiated Immunity Device Test Orientations - IEC 61000-4-3

I just pulled up edition 3.1 of 61000-4-3. In clause 8.2, it says the "test shall normally be performed with the generating antenna facing each side of the EUT. When the equipment can be used in different orientations (i.e. vertical or horizontal) all sides shall be exposed t the field during the test. When technically justified, some EUT's can be tested by exposing fewer faces to the generating antenna. In other cases, as determined for example by the type and size of EUT or the frequencies of test, more than four azimuths may need to be exposed."

So really, they are saying if it can operate in any orientation, it needs to be tested on all side, otherwise only the four sides as that is what is feasible.

Yes, technically, floor standing equipment may be exposed from above or below out in the field, but the typical exposure will come from a source horizontal to the equipment. A EMC test house engineer kind of told me years ago that was why they only test four sides. Nowadays, I guess one would have to look at it from a risk analysis perspective to determine if other faces are needed.
Thanks to phase90 for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #5  
Old 7th December 2017, 03:33 PM
rothlis

 
 
Total Posts: 27
Re: Radiated Immunity Device Test Orientations - IEC 61000-4-3

I read that excerpt as follows:
The "four azimuths" in the last sentence are equivalent to "each side" in the first sentence, so that "normally be performed" = left, right, front, back. The second sentence is then saying that if the device can be used without the top and bottom facing the ceiling and floor then the top and bottom also need to be exposed, and the last sentence is essentially saying the same thing in more general terms that include other conditions. So exposure of the top and bottom is treated as the exception rather than the rule.

It may be true that the majority of interference sources would come from a horizontal plane, but there is no shortage of cases where devices which have a defined upright position during use (and thus not treated as operating horizontally) would easily be exposed from the top or bottom (e.g., any pole or wall mounted device could have sources mounted above or below it, and any cart or similar device could have sources sitting directly above it).

I'm inclined to think that there is a deficiency in the language of the standard that has led to an accepted practice which doesn't align with the intent of the test. But maybe I'm over-analyzing this.
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > > >

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Particular standards, essential performance in EMC Immunity Test Eamon IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2 20th October 2016 08:27 PM
Can a fail still be a pass? (Criteria Level B for 61000-4-6 Conducted Immunity) qu1nn IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3 12th February 2015 01:17 AM
Radiated Immunity Testing as per IEC 60601-1-2 DileepJoshi IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2 5th June 2014 02:37 PM
List of Changes from En 61000-3-3:1995 to En 61000-3-3:2013 occounty CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 1 30th January 2014 01:17 PM
Is it weird for my conducted immunity (4-6) test result? Need help. yellowline CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 1 12th August 2009 10:51 AM



The time now is 07:15 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



Misc. Internal Links


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"