What kind of class are you referring to?
Cheers!
For me those classes are for finished medical devices, whereas your chip is not subject to the legislation own its own.
So for me such classification for the chip itself that is a component of a finished medical device is not really sensible due to the fact that the legislation is for finished medical devices.
... I am not sure if you are more in with this than out though ...
Cheers!
The EU device directive classification only applies to the final medical device - not to components of the device.
The classification criteria can be found in Annex 9 of the directive.
The classification of a pill-camera is, I think, controlled by Rule 5 - Invasive Devices.
From that it is:
Class 1 if for transient use (less than 60 minutes)
Class IIa if for short term use (less than 30 days)
Class IIb if for long term use (more than 30 days).
But if it connects to another device with a higher classification it inherits the higher class.
I think it is up to the discretion of the manufacturer that subcontracts the foundry.
Or the foundry may find itself in a situation that the certificate gives a kind of competitive advantage for them. Otherwise I would not go for it from the perspective of the foundry.
... but to be honest, recently not a rocket science to be ISO13485 certified ...
Cheers!