The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums
Verifying training effectiveness for procedure changes
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Verifying training effectiveness for procedure changes
Verifying training effectiveness for procedure changes
Verifying training effectiveness for procedure changes
Verifying training effectiveness for procedure changes
Verifying training effectiveness for procedure changes
Verifying training effectiveness for procedure changes
Verifying training effectiveness for procedure changes
Verifying training effectiveness for procedure changes
Verifying training effectiveness for procedure changes
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > > >
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Verifying training effectiveness for procedure changes


Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services


Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC



International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

AIAG - Automotive Industry Action Group

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Organization for Standardization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags
document control, iso 13485 - medical device qms, iso 13485:2016, training (general), training effectiveness
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 12th June 2018, 06:38 PM
lisasolo

 
 
Total Posts: 1
Please Help! Verifying training effectiveness for procedure changes

Hi all,

My company implemented all required changes for ISO 13485:2016, including verification of training effectiveness based on risk. Our procedure includes quizzes or demonstration of knowledge for high risk, discussions for medium risk and monitoring for low risk.

This has been working for us, but we have come upon an issue when documents are changed. When documents are changed, we always retrain employees that were trained on that document. We do not have a method of verifying the effectiveness of this retraining. It does not make sense to have employees retake a quiz each time a high risk procedure is minorly changed. Does anyone have any ideas for this situation? Thank you!

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 12th June 2018, 08:00 PM
normzone

 
 
Total Posts: 751
Re: Verifying training effectiveness for procedure changes

In my previous life our training document had a signoff block at the bottom, where the trainer signed one of three blocks attesting that they verified the effectiveness of the training through one of these:

Question and answer
Test
Observation
  Post Number #3  
Old 13th June 2018, 10:44 AM
dst89

 
 
Total Posts: 1
Re: Verifying training effectiveness for procedure changes

My company is ISO certified. Whenever changes are made to SOPs, the quiz is also updated/revised to incorporate the changes. Everyone who was trained originally has to retake the new quiz for effectiveness training.
  Post Number #4  
Old 13th June 2018, 01:32 PM
yodon

 
 
Total Posts: 1,120
Re: Verifying training effectiveness for procedure changes

To me, quizzes and Q/A sessions are often used to satisfy the ISO requirement (and admittedly, I use them, too) but are they truly a measure of effectiveness? Are you seeing deviations or NCs after the procedures are changed? We also monitor this aspect and discuss in Management Review.
  Post Number #5  
Old 20th June 2018, 06:18 PM
insect warfare's Avatar
insect warfare

 
 
Total Posts: 540
Re: Verifying training effectiveness for procedure changes

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by lisasolo View Post

Hi all,

My company implemented all required changes for ISO 13485:2016, including verification of training effectiveness based on risk. Our procedure includes quizzes or demonstration of knowledge for high risk, discussions for medium risk and monitoring for low risk.

This has been working for us, but we have come upon an issue when documents are changed. When documents are changed, we always retrain employees that were trained on that document. We do not have a method of verifying the effectiveness of this retraining. It does not make sense to have employees retake a quiz each time a high risk procedure is minorly changed. Does anyone have any ideas for this situation? Thank you!
First things first - welcome to the Cove!

You stated that you do not have a method of verifying effectiveness of this re-training, which essentially means that you first need to define (and possibly document) such method(s).

For example (and this is just a suggestion), you could document in your training process that the following activities are acceptable as evaluation methods: 1) interactive Q&A, 2) completing quizzes, tests or other types of assessments, and/or 3) applied demonstrations by the worker of knowledge gained through training or instruction. This may provide the flexibility you need to escape the "retaking a quiz each time a high risk procedure is minorly changed" trap.

If you use a form to capture evidence of training, you could insert separate signature fields into the form, such as "Trained by" and "Evaluated by" to show evidence of training and evaluation together, even though they may or may not be done by the same person (it would not matter how the evaluation was done as long as it was done according to the documented training process, although you may want to track this specifically). The signatures, of course, then serve as an acknowledgment of the activities performed.

Please keep in mind that competency is the ultimate goal, but it is also prudent for your organization to have appropriate records of training and evaluation, notwithstanding any management system certifications.

Brian
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > > >

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Basis for Verifying Corrective Actions and Effectiveness QP029 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 12 18th July 2011 03:37 AM
Verifying the Effectiveness of Corrective Action - Challenge with an external auditor jcarlos Nonconformance and Corrective Action 16 3rd September 2009 10:13 AM
Measuring Training Effectiveness - How do you measure Effectiveness? Steven Sulkin Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 50 10th October 2006 12:26 PM
Closing Out Corrective Actions and Verifying their Effectiveness tracey ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 29 17th April 2003 03:02 PM
Corrective Actions - Specifically closing out and verifying effectiveness SheilaK Nonconformance and Corrective Action 30 29th April 2000 10:11 AM



The time now is 04:57 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



Misc. Internal Links


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"