The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums
Are the TC 176 Documents on Risk Based Thinking useful to you?
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Are the TC 176 Documents on Risk Based Thinking useful to you?
Are the TC 176 Documents on Risk Based Thinking useful to you?
Are the TC 176 Documents on Risk Based Thinking useful to you?
Are the TC 176 Documents on Risk Based Thinking useful to you?
Are the TC 176 Documents on Risk Based Thinking useful to you?
Are the TC 176 Documents on Risk Based Thinking useful to you?
Are the TC 176 Documents on Risk Based Thinking useful to you?
Are the TC 176 Documents on Risk Based Thinking useful to you?
Are the TC 176 Documents on Risk Based Thinking useful to you?
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > >
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Are the TC 176 Documents on Risk Based Thinking useful to you?


Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services


Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC



International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

AIAG - Automotive Industry Action Group

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Organization for Standardization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

View Poll Results: Are the ISO TC176 RBT documents useful in explaining the concept of risk?
Yes 5 20.00%
No 19 76.00%
I don't have a formed opinion 1 4.00%
Voters: 25. You may not vote on this Poll because you are not Logged In.


Some Related Topic Tags
iso 9001:2015, tc 176 (iso technical committee for iso 9000 documents), risk based thinking (rbt)
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 14th January 2015, 11:19 AM
Sidney Vianna's Avatar
Sidney Vianna

 
 
Total Posts: 9,350
Question Are the TC 176 Documents on Risk Based Thinking useful to you?

The ISO TC 176 develops not only standards, but supporting documents to assist organizations and individuals in understanding the contents of the standards, in terms of implementation and assessing conformance.

With the demise of the requirements for "preventive action" in the 2015 version of ISO 9001, the TC 176 SC2 decided to introduce the concept of Risk Based Thinking (RBT) in the standard. Not surprisingly, controversy ensued. Not necessarily about the concept of risk management, but HOW to make it easily understood, of pragmatic implementation and the facilitation of effective and consistent assessment by (internal and external) auditors.

Realizing that the CD and DIS have been subjected to sharp criticism around the RBT requirements, the TC 176 SC 2 has already released two documents to assist with a better understanding of the subject:

A presentation on ISO 9001 and Risk Based Thinking (here)

A paper on ISO 9001 and Risk (here)

I believe that the documents fall way short of providing practical, actionable and useful guidance for quality management system professionals to clearly understand what is needed to comply with ISO 9001:2015 in terms of RBT. Ditto for auditors.

At the risk of repeating the "process approach" fiasco since it's introduction in the 3rd Edition of ISO 9001, we might end up many diverging ideas of what RBT is. Failure to accomplish an universal comprehension of what RBT is, represents a failure of the standardization process. Standards, by design, MUST allow for effective implementation and conformity assessment practices. If Standards don't promote a COMMON UNDERSTANDING of a subject, it has failed it's mission.

So, I would like to poll Covers from all quadrants and ask if they believe that the documents developed, so far, to assist with an understanding of RBT have succeeded? Especially the paper on ISO 9001 and Risk, with the example of a road crossing. Can you extrapolate from that paper/example to your Quality System? Was the paper useful? Why did the TC cross the road?

Last edited by Sidney Vianna; 14th January 2015 at 11:42 AM.

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 14th January 2015, 11:30 AM
hogheavenfarm's Avatar
hogheavenfarm

 
 
Total Posts: 581
Re: Are the TC 176 Documents on Risk Based Thinking useful to you?

I thought the road crossing example to be especially poor, a gross oversimplication, and not a good analogy at all.
Thank You to hogheavenfarm for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #3  
Old 15th January 2015, 12:58 AM
Colin's Avatar
Colin

 
 
Total Posts: 1,508
Re: Are the TC 176 Documents on Risk Based Thinking useful to you?

I agree with the sentiments regarding the road crossing analogy - it is cringe worthy.

The presentation is a little better but they both seem to concentrate more on risk rather than opportunity - yet the 2 are being pushed forwards together.

I must say that I got more from a video with Nigel Croft but I can't seem to find the link at the moment.
Thank You to Colin for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #4  
Old 15th January 2015, 03:21 AM
John Broomfield's Avatar
John Broomfield

 
 
Total Posts: 2,609
Yin Yang Re: Are the TC 176 Documents on Risk Based Thinking useful to you?

DIS 9001 did not specify enough for even the most experienced auditor to audit risk-based thinking (RBT) beyond the auditee knowing what their risks and opportunities are.

RBT may not result in any evidence or action by the auditee.

The FDIS should require the auditee to establish its own criteria for determining the significance of risks and opportunities related to its stakeholders and their needs for quality outcomes, products, processes and system.

Then users of the standard can focus on the processes and controls necessary to manage significant risks and opportunities.

Making up for a weak specification with guidance is not the solution.

John
Thank You to John Broomfield for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #5  
Old 15th January 2015, 08:26 AM
Paul Simpson's Avatar
Paul Simpson

 
 
Total Posts: 1,834
Re: Are the TC 176 Documents on Risk Based Thinking useful to you?

Thanks for starting the poll, Sidney. I voted 'No'.

I start from the position of not understanding what message we are trying to convey with the phrase 'Risk based thinking'. In kicking the 3 words around in my head for longer than a minute I find questions emerge and, if that is the case, then RBT doesn't cut it as a principle in the same way as, say, 'Process Approach' does.

Now I accept that there is a lot more work to be done with Process Approach and I hope that WG 24 will give it further thought as well as revisiting RBT.

I'm not sure how auditors will take to RBT and what that will mean for assessments. I feel happy that my thinking (RB or not RB ) about what quality is and how a management system should be aligned to: deliver quality; satisy customers; maximize opportunities; and manage risks remains largely unchanged.

I'll point some people to this thread if we can come up with some sensible guidance as to what RBT is and how to explain it. Or even if we recommend losing the term and deleting the guidance.
Thank You to Paul Simpson for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #6  
Old 15th January 2015, 11:35 AM
Peter Fraser's Avatar
Peter Fraser

 
 
Total Posts: 457
Re: Are the TC 176 Documents on Risk Based Thinking useful to you?

Sidney

It is bound to fail since it is trying to justify a flawed concept - why on earth attempt to redefine "risk" as potentially positive, when even the rest of 9001 talks of "... and opportunities"? The example makes no sense to me.

The line "The concept of “opportunity” in the context of ISO 9001 relates to exceeding expectations and going beyond stated objectives" makes no sense to me either. An opportunity can be to be achieve an objective more efficiently or effectively, neither of which need impact on customer satisfaction.

And... the implication that preventive action is a "single component of a quality management system" implies a lack of understanding of "preventive action" - every time you accept an order, or allocate a project manager, you should be trying to prevent things from going wrong.

0 out of 10.
Thank You to Peter Fraser for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #7  
Old 15th January 2015, 03:57 PM
insect warfare's Avatar
insect warfare

 
 
Total Posts: 540
Re: Are the TC 176 Documents on Risk Based Thinking useful to you?

I wonder if the next edition of ISO 9004 will be utilized to effectively cover the subject of RBT, and (more particularly) when it will be revised. So far, there seems to be no indication on ISO's website that a revision of ISO 9004 is just around the corner.

Does anyone here know what is in store for ISO 9004 during the ISO 9001:2015 transition period?

Brian
  Post Number #8  
Old 15th January 2015, 06:09 PM
Sidney Vianna's Avatar
Sidney Vianna

 
 
Total Posts: 9,350
Re: Are the TC 176 Documents on Risk Based Thinking useful to you?

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by insect warfare View Post

Does anyone here know what is in store for ISO 9004 during the ISO 9001:2015 transition period?
ISO 9004:2009 underwent a review process and was reaffirmed on 2014-06-18. It won't probably be revised for another 4-5 years. After the release of ISO 9001:2015, all the attention will go to the ISO/TS 9002 and hopefully that won't be botched too badly.
Thanks to Sidney Vianna for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > >

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Risk Requirements to meet the explicit Risk Based Approach of ISO 13485:2016 Examples bmelissam ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 18 19th June 2018 02:09 PM
Risk Management (and Risk Based Thinking) in ISO 9001:2015 aburaggi ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 35 9th March 2018 01:45 PM
Evolving QA from 'Compliance-based' to 'Science/Risk-based' approach v9991 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2 27th February 2011 09:21 AM
Risk Based Certification sathis General Auditing Discussions 2 4th January 2007 11:10 AM
Risk Based Audits ocussing on those areas of identified risk eric abbott General Auditing Discussions 3 28th February 2001 06:17 AM



The time now is 06:02 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



Misc. Internal Links


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"