The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Is Identification of Risks and Opportunities required for QMS Processes?
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Is Identification of Risks and Opportunities required for QMS Processes?
Is Identification of Risks and Opportunities required for QMS Processes?
Is Identification of Risks and Opportunities required for QMS Processes?
Is Identification of Risks and Opportunities required for QMS Processes?
Is Identification of Risks and Opportunities required for QMS Processes?
Is Identification of Risks and Opportunities required for QMS Processes?
Is Identification of Risks and Opportunities required for QMS Processes?
Is Identification of Risks and Opportunities required for QMS Processes?
Is Identification of Risks and Opportunities required for QMS Processes?
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > >
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Is Identification of Risks and Opportunities required for QMS Processes? - Page 2


Elsmar XML RSS Feed
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services


Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC



International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Organization for Standardization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags
interpretations, iso 9001 - quality management systems, iso 9001:2015, qms (quality management system), risk based thinking (rbt), risk management and analysis
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  Post Number #9  
Old 29th January 2017, 01:53 PM
Jen Kirley's Avatar
Jen Kirley

 
 
Total Posts: 6,021
Re: Is Identification of Risks and Opportunities required for QMS Processes?

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by MVladimir View Post

Jen,
As for me - yes, of course. Above mentioned document - ISO/TC 176/SC 2/N1289 THE PROCESS APPROACH IN ISO 9001:2015 has been downloaded from ISO/TC 176 home page. What then? ISO provides very poor explanation with respect to a lot of requirements. Vladimir
I feel your pain. There is additional guidance provided in ISO/TS 9002:2016(E), Quality management systems - Guidelines for the application of ISO 9001:2015, and ISO 9000:2015 - Quality management system Fundamentals and vocabulary.

To provide insight on what is expected of auditors to verify conformance to requirements, the ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group has published a website for auditors, consultants and quality practitioners.

I hope this helps!
Thanks to Jen Kirley for your informative Post and/or Attachment!

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #10  
Old 29th January 2017, 03:20 PM
MVladimir

 
 
Total Posts: 97
Question Re: Is Identification of Risks and Opportunities required for QMS Processes?

Thanks! I am familiar with all of this ISO guides. No suitable advices have been found there.
But I would like to return to initial question of this threat: Shall organization identify risks and opportunities for every identified QMS process?

Your opinion, please!
Thanks to MVladimir for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #11  
Old 29th January 2017, 03:29 PM
dsanabria

 
 
Total Posts: 1,179
Re: Is Identification of Risks and Opportunities required for QMS Processes?

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by MVladimir View Post

Thanks! I am familiar with all of this ISO guides. No suitable advices have been found there.
But I would like to return to initial question of this threat: Shall organization identify risks and opportunities for every identified QMS process?

Your opinion, please!
Overall - RISK should be incorporated into all movement of the Quality Management System and the Products and services that you provide. While no requirements to have a procedure written it is best business practice to implement one that everyone can see and measure.

in reality that is what ISO 9001:2015 wants you to do but they left it to you to define it, implemented and most important - let it add value to your QMS.

However, no auditor can give you an NCR if you do not have it written down.

NOTE: the Aerospace Risk Management System from the handbook has been published in this forum.
Thanks to dsanabria for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #12  
Old 29th January 2017, 03:32 PM
Sidney Vianna's Avatar
Sidney Vianna

 
 
Total Posts: 8,889
Re: Is Identification of Risks and Opportunities required for QMS Processes?

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by MVladimir View Post

My conclusion - there is not any DIRECT requirements in 9001:2015 to identify risks and opportunities for ALL QMS processes.

Any opinions will be appreciated!
I have said it numerous times, RBT should have been coded as another principle in ISO 9000. Just like customer focus, leadership, process approach, etc...

The TC 176 developed this concept of RBT as a "replacement" for the preventive action requirement, which got dropped from 9001, taking into account the mandatory framework brought up by the HLS (annex SL) of the ISO/IEC Directives bla bla bla...

Whenever we are designing, implementing, improving, enhancing, revamping, etc. any business process which has a potential to affect product conformity and/or customer satisfaction, we are touching the "QMS", be it while we are selecting suppliers, packaging the product, designing a fabrication fixture, answering a call in the call centre, etc...

So, in my opinion, ANYTHING that an organization does which might affect product conformity and/or customer satisfaction, IRRESPECTIVE of where it happens, needs to be (AS FORMAL OR INFORMAL, COMMENSURATE TO THE POTENTIAL IMPACT) assessed for it's intrinsic risks.

An example of a typical daily occurrence that is not addressed, from a RBT perspective, in many organizations:

Sales people are allowed, sometimes encouraged to lie to a customer about delivery dates, in order to boost sales performance. In the long term, dissatisfied customers will drop that company as a supplier for chronic late deliveries. In the meantime, however, sales people make their quota, get their bonuses and management is "happy". Until they can't find new customers to replace the ones they lost.

So, is there a risk to allow sales people lying to customers about unrealistic delivery dates? I think it is obvious it does. ISO 9001 has requirements that should prevent that from happening, but does it? In the real world?
Thank You to Sidney Vianna for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #13  
Old 29th January 2017, 03:53 PM
MVladimir

 
 
Total Posts: 97
Re: Is Identification of Risks and Opportunities required for QMS Processes?

Quote:
So, in my opinion, ANYTHING that an organization does which might affect product conformity and/or customer satisfaction, IRRESPECTIVE of where it happens, needs to be (AS FORMAL OR INFORMAL, COMMENSURATE TO THE POTENTIAL IMPACT) assessed for it's intrinsic risks.
Practically useful point of view. I agree with you. But often Organization identifies a number of processes, not directly related with CS and OTD. For example - HR or Financial Management. Shall organization determined risks for this processes? I'm not sure that it is mandatory.
  Post Number #14  
Old 29th January 2017, 04:15 PM
Sidney Vianna's Avatar
Sidney Vianna

 
 
Total Posts: 8,889
Re: Is Identification of Risks and Opportunities required for QMS Processes?

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by MVladimir View Post

Practically useful point of view. I agree with you. But often Organization identifies a number of processes, not directly related with CS and OTD. For example - HR or Financial Management. Shall organization determined risks for this processes? I'm not sure that it is mandatory.
We have a post here about the story of a small business that lost it's major customer because, someone in accounting decided out of the blue and unilaterally, that they would no longer accept payment by credit cards.

Financial management is not part of the QMS? We do know, for a fact, that a large percentage of customer dissatisfaction has to do with erroneous billing. Have a look at the Should the billing process....thread..

So, if billing is part of "financial management" and you fail to see the connection between billing mistakes and customer satisfaction, then your RBT needs re-calibration....just kidding.
Thanks to Sidney Vianna for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #15  
Old 29th January 2017, 04:24 PM
MVladimir

 
 
Total Posts: 97
Re: Is Identification of Risks and Opportunities required for QMS Processes?

If I understood correctly based on our discussion about implementation of the RBT in the process approach - it is up to Organization to decide whether or not to determine risks to any QMS processes. Is it right?
  Post Number #16  
Old 29th January 2017, 04:34 PM
Sidney Vianna's Avatar
Sidney Vianna

 
 
Total Posts: 8,889
Re: Is Identification of Risks and Opportunities required for QMS Processes?

The risks exist, irrespective if the organization identify them, or not. Like the example I offered of sales people being incentivized by management to make the sale, even if they need to lie to the customer.

It is up to each organization to assess how significant the risks are and which ones need mitigation. Once again, the 9001 standard infers that such assessment should be as formal or informal, commensurate with the potential impacts.

Last edited by Sidney Vianna; 30th January 2017 at 12:57 PM.
Thanks to Sidney Vianna for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > >

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Does KPI for Processes need to be correlated with the specific Risks for Processes? armani ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1 16th February 2017 10:59 AM
Actions To Address Risks and Opportunities Rich Shippy IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1 13th February 2017 03:59 PM
Confusion about Risks for Processes in ISO 9001:2015 armani ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 41 30th August 2016 12:03 PM
[QMS] Identification and Evaluation of Aspects, Impacts and Risks... x-files ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2 13th May 2015 01:30 AM
Medical Device Hazard Risks - Normal Use Risks vs. Faulty Use Risks 20130523 ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 4 28th July 2011 12:40 PM



The time now is 03:08 PM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


 
 
 


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"