Q
QAMTY
Hi everybody
Could you please share thoughs in my case.
I have ISO 9001 2008, and we are running internal audits.
Im in the position of General Director, recently I revised one of
audits report of an audit performed by one internal auditor.
I noticed that really was not a good audit,it has several faults
Nc´s were incorrectly documented, lacking of enough evidences,
wrong document identifications, findings that seemed more OFI, than
real nc´s,etc.
The auditee, a recent hired boy in the audited process, accepted the report
and now is working on the CAs/PAs.
My question is:
What can I do in this case, Can I cancel the audit and repeat it with a new auditor, or just ignore the audit report and make CA´s only in findings which I consider really apply?
How to manage this issue?
I read ISO 19011 and I dont see anything about it?
Thanks
Could you please share thoughs in my case.
I have ISO 9001 2008, and we are running internal audits.
Im in the position of General Director, recently I revised one of
audits report of an audit performed by one internal auditor.
I noticed that really was not a good audit,it has several faults
Nc´s were incorrectly documented, lacking of enough evidences,
wrong document identifications, findings that seemed more OFI, than
real nc´s,etc.
The auditee, a recent hired boy in the audited process, accepted the report
and now is working on the CAs/PAs.
My question is:
What can I do in this case, Can I cancel the audit and repeat it with a new auditor, or just ignore the audit report and make CA´s only in findings which I consider really apply?
How to manage this issue?
I read ISO 19011 and I dont see anything about it?
Thanks