qualprod
Trusted Information Resource
Hi
For those fellows who already have managed risks.
What could be the better way to control risks?
E.g. to use a format where risk is identified, is assigned probability and impact, risk value is calculated, also mentioning causes and so on.
It could have a control of the document, like any other control of Changes, for example the control of the procedure of control the documents.
This way, if a change in a risk is nedeed (impact, probability, action plans), by using this format , the document changes in revision, and changes are tracked.
The other way could be a simple spreadsheet where risk are registered, all data related to the risk, is fed.
But... because this control is is "live" document, it could be very easy to change aspects of risk without having evidences, because is a dynamic document.
So, in the way you manage risks, which method you think is best and why?
Thank you for give some light.
For those fellows who already have managed risks.
What could be the better way to control risks?
E.g. to use a format where risk is identified, is assigned probability and impact, risk value is calculated, also mentioning causes and so on.
It could have a control of the document, like any other control of Changes, for example the control of the procedure of control the documents.
This way, if a change in a risk is nedeed (impact, probability, action plans), by using this format , the document changes in revision, and changes are tracked.
The other way could be a simple spreadsheet where risk are registered, all data related to the risk, is fed.
But... because this control is is "live" document, it could be very easy to change aspects of risk without having evidences, because is a dynamic document.
So, in the way you manage risks, which method you think is best and why?
Thank you for give some light.