The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums
ECO (Engineering Change Order) Revision - Letter change or part number change?
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
ECO (Engineering Change Order) Revision - Letter change or part number change?
ECO (Engineering Change Order) Revision - Letter change or part number change?
ECO (Engineering Change Order) Revision - Letter change or part number change?
ECO (Engineering Change Order) Revision - Letter change or part number change?
ECO (Engineering Change Order) Revision - Letter change or part number change?
ECO (Engineering Change Order) Revision - Letter change or part number change?
ECO (Engineering Change Order) Revision - Letter change or part number change?
ECO (Engineering Change Order) Revision - Letter change or part number change?
ECO (Engineering Change Order) Revision - Letter change or part number change?
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > >
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

ECO (Engineering Change Order) Revision - Letter change or part number change?


Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services


Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC



International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

AIAG - Automotive Industry Action Group

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Organization for Standardization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags
engineering changes
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 5th March 2007, 07:01 PM
kcmomde

 
 
Total Posts: 13
Please Help! ECO (Engineering Change Order) Revision - Letter change or part number change?

We have 2 conflicting opinions on what constitutes an rev letter change to a PCA versus changing the part number. We had some boards assembled, but the bill of materials that we provided was not correct, thus some resistors were not installed. One camp states that the part number should change for example 123456-00 Rev A to 123456-01 Rev A. But the other camp states that it should only be a rev letter so it would become 123456-00 Rev B. The second camp makes a good point that we should only change the part number when the bare PCB is changed, but the first group states that adding the resistors changes the boards form, fit or function. Of course I'm in the middle of the whole thing so I wanted to get some other folks opinions.

Thanks,

Kym

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 5th March 2007, 10:02 PM
fireonce's Avatar
fireonce

 
 
Total Posts: 189
Re: ECO (Engineering Change Order) Revision - Letter change or part number change?

I prefer the second method,which is more convenient especially in system.
Of course, if the changed part is fully different from the original part.
  Post Number #3  
Old 6th March 2007, 07:35 AM
CarolX's Avatar
CarolX

 
 
Total Posts: 2,168
Re: ECO (Engineering Change Order) Revision - Letter change or part number change?

Hi Kym,

I see this method of changing part numbers more and more often. It tends to occur in companies that are using Oracle for their MRP system. Since I know nothing about Oracle, I can't really comment why it is happening -

We have a customer that changes part numbers everytime they make a small revision to the part (i.e. move a .250" dia hole by .500"). Unfortunaely for us, when we receive an order for the new/revised part, it triggers our prototype process instead of our revision process.
  Post Number #4  
Old 6th March 2007, 09:15 AM
Steve McQuality's Avatar
Steve McQuality

 
 
Total Posts: 108
Re: ECO (Engineering Change Order) Revision - Letter change or part number change?

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by CarolX View Post

Hi Kym,

...We have a customer that changes part numbers everytime they make a small revision to the part (i.e. move a .250" dia hole by .500"). Unfortunaely for us, when we receive an order for the new/revised part, it triggers our prototype process instead of our revision process.
Hi Kym:
Carol's example above is a little extreme from a customer perspective(although I know it happens). We've had this same discussion recently at my company. I would offer the following;

Considering this is a PCB change (components only to correct in internal error w/ the BOM), it would depend on how you identify the parts and what kind of traceability you need for that change. Do you have P/N and Revision screen printed on the PCB? If so, then the Rev change may be traceable and you will be able to segregate the parts and not mix them up in production.

However, if you don't have the Rev printed on the boards you'll need to decide the degree of the "what if". That is to say, "what if" the new and old PCB's get mixed up (How much time & money would this cost you?)? What about returned products - can you easily identify which board is in a returned product several months down the road. Are the parts interchangeable (I assume not, since the addition of components was made to fix an earlier omission)?

The reason I quoted Carol is that, I would assume (and maybe Carol can comment from a Supplier perspective) that if you contact your supplier of the PCB and indicate that the P/N change is only for traceability in your facility and that the board will not require new artwork, Gerber files, etc., then the Supplier will be able to "circumvent" the automatic trigger for additional cost that comes with a brand new P/N. ...just the addition pennies to add a couple more resistors.

...I hope this helps.

-Steve
  Post Number #5  
Old 6th March 2007, 11:24 AM
CarolX's Avatar
CarolX

 
 
Total Posts: 2,168
Re: ECO (Engineering Change Order) Revision - Letter change or part number change?

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Steve McQuality View Post

The reason I quoted Carol is that, I would assume (and maybe Carol can comment from a Supplier perspective) that if you contact your supplier of the PCB and indicate that the P/N change is only for traceability in your facility and that the board will not require new artwork, Gerber files, etc., then the Supplier will be able to "circumvent" the automatic trigger for additional cost that comes with a brand new P/N. ...just the addition pennies to add a couple more resistors.
Hi Steve and thanks for your input - I can see how this may work to an advantage in other industries. I work in sheet metal, completely different animal!!!!

And yes - it would be nice if someone would pick up the phone and call us, but, alas , we are at the bottom of the food chain.
  Post Number #6  
Old 6th March 2007, 12:31 PM
John Nabors - 2009

 
 
Total Posts: 201
Re: ECO (Engineering Change Order) Revision - Letter change or part number change?

Kym and Carol-

I just did a quick review of ASME Y14.35M-1997 ("Revision of Engineering Drawings and Associated Documents"). The standard does not directly give guidance for when the scope of the design change requires superceding the drawing; however I would think that in the examples you both cited it would be better to rev up the drawing than to supercede it just because you would have the revision history right there on the drawing to reference the evolution of the design.

Here's a thought to throw out - suppose one adopted the philosophy that a change in a design feature for purposes such as correcting an error results in a drawing revvision but a change in the design intent is cause for a new part number? What do all of you think?

Also - Carol stated...

Quote:
We have a customer that changes part numbers everytime they make a small revision to the part (i.e. move a .250" dia hole by .500").
...Does the customer reference the superceded part numbers as specified in paras 4.4.1 and 6.1.3 of ASME Y14.35M? If the superceded drawings are retained for reference purposes are they labeled in accordance with para 4.4.2 of the standard? Just wondering.

Regards -John
  Post Number #7  
Old 6th March 2007, 01:57 PM
CarolX's Avatar
CarolX

 
 
Total Posts: 2,168
Re: ECO (Engineering Change Order) Revision - Letter change or part number change?

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by John Nabors View Post

...Does the customer reference the superceded part numbers as specified in paras 4.4.1 and 6.1.3 of ASME Y14.35M? If the superceded drawings are retained for reference purposes are they labeled in accordance with para 4.4.2 of the standard? Just wondering.

Regards -John
HAHAHAHAHA - I don't think any of my customers follow that standard.

In fact - FWIW and

I asked our young, recent college graduate engineers what they were taught in their college drafting courses, and they both replied, we didn't take drafting classes - not a graduation requirement for BSME.
  Post Number #8  
Old 6th March 2007, 02:33 PM
John Nabors - 2009

 
 
Total Posts: 201
Re: ECO (Engineering Change Order) Revision - Letter change or part number change?

Quote:
I asked our young, recent college graduate engineers what they were taught in their college drafting courses, and they both replied, we didn't take drafting classes - not a graduation requirement for BSME
That... ...is truly... ...apalling....
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > >

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Engineering Change Request/Order (ECR/ECO) or Document Change Request/Order (DCR/DCO) Marquee05 Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 30 5th May 2015 11:18 AM
Is ECN (Engineering Change Notice) Necessary for Part Number Change murugan IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4 22nd February 2011 04:55 AM
From ECR (Engineering Change Request) to ECN (Engineering Change Note) - double work! tomjess Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2 22nd November 2008 09:10 PM
TS 16949 Control Plan and Part Number Revision Change Level DerekCA FMEA and Control Plans 1 29th November 2007 08:02 PM
ECN (Engineering Change Notice) / ECO (Engineering Change Order) System Raffy Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 1 20th March 2001 04:11 PM



The time now is 05:04 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



Misc. Internal Links


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"
The Elsmar Cove web site and all content is owned by Rabbithash Corp. as of 1 MAY 2018.
Unlike Facebook and other properties such as Linkedin, We don't buy, sell, or "share" visitor information. Never have, Never will...
GDPR Compliant since 1996, keeping Marc's vision alive!