M
medical_eng
Hi Covers
Long time Cove reader but the first time to post. This is a very helpful forum, so I thought I would post my question. I've been through other posts and I didn't come across my question yet, so here it goes.
I've been through all of Wheeler's material on GR&R's, fantastic stuff. If all statistics material could have such clear explanations it might not have such a bad name!
My question is with the "Tolerance Analysis" of the Excel worksheet. I see the output for a good gauge per his example and agree with it, but I'm not sure of how a bad gauge would look like.
So here's my question: What would the numbers look like if "the gauge (is) NOT good enough to inspect this part to this tolerance"?
My aplogoies if the answer is staring me in the face and I am not recognizing it!
Many thanks in advance.
Cheers,
medical_eng
Long time Cove reader but the first time to post. This is a very helpful forum, so I thought I would post my question. I've been through other posts and I didn't come across my question yet, so here it goes.
I've been through all of Wheeler's material on GR&R's, fantastic stuff. If all statistics material could have such clear explanations it might not have such a bad name!
My question is with the "Tolerance Analysis" of the Excel worksheet. I see the output for a good gauge per his example and agree with it, but I'm not sure of how a bad gauge would look like.
So here's my question: What would the numbers look like if "the gauge (is) NOT good enough to inspect this part to this tolerance"?
My aplogoies if the answer is staring me in the face and I am not recognizing it!
Many thanks in advance.
Cheers,
medical_eng