D
Donald Duck
Who can tell me what is the traceability method for V & V, and what is the benefits of the method and limitations?
some advices?
some advices?
I would suppose he is referring toMarc said:What is V & V?
Pretty much gibes with my understanding of V&V. The question on the table is "tie it to traceability method."Randy said:V&V has lent itself to a whole world of interpretation.
Verification, as I understand and preach, is the process(s) necessary to ensure that the product (service) design (components/sub-components) meets or falls into the defined parameters. In aviation maintenance this would include the operational checks of sytem/sub-system components.
Validation, as I understand and also preach, is the process whereby we show through test/operation that the product (service) is capable of meeting all requirements. I equate this to the flight testing of aircraft after maintenance.
Some things cannot be Validated until operated..like the Space Shuttle, or more recently the Mars Rovers.
Where is the data?Donald Duck said:Who can tell me what is the traceability method for V & V, and what is the benefits of the method and limitations?
some advices?
user requirements <--performance qualification
\ /
functional specs <--operational qualification
\ /
design specs <--installation qualification
\ /
system build
Just for future reference, I hacked the "place holder dots" out of view by changing the text color to white. I got the idea from wrodnigg's comment about "whitespaces."wrodnigg said:user requirements.............performance qualification
..._____\_______..........___/___________
...functional specs........operational qualification
......_____\___...........___/___________
......design specs........installation qualification
.................\___...____/
..................system build
(ignore the dots, they are used as whitespaces)