Fuse Agency Approvals - Fuses without VDE / IEC Approvals on AC Mains Lines

[phase90]

For devices sold into Europe, is it acceptable to use fuses on AC Mains lines that have UL agency approval , but not VDE / IEC approvals?

 

[Peter Selvey]

For the practical side, you need to check the details of the UL approvals fit with the situation. For example, for a mains fuse, you typically need 1500A breaking capacity. Some UL fuses are tested to 10,000A breaking capacity (which is fine), but the test is done at 100V, not 230V found in Europe. I would not use the UL fuse in this situation. Consider a fire caused by your device, fuse did not work or exploded. UL will walk away and say it's not our fault, the fuse was used outside of specification.

On the technical side, IEC 60601-1 requires IEC standards to be used (for parts related to MOP, which fuses are often considered). So, if a part only meets a UL standard (or any non-IEC standard), it should be written up in the risk management file as a alternate solution. This has been a common approach if IEC certified parts not yet freely available (batteries, PCBs).

But for fuses, it could be trouble as IEC certified fuses have been around for a long time.

 

[phase90]

Thanks for the quick response, Peter.
I agree with you on the breaking capacity. In this case, however, the fuse is a high breaking capacity and has breaking capacity ratings for both 125VAC and 250VAC (as well as 500 VAC, 63 VDC, and 400 VDC). It just does not have a VDE listing on the datasheet. I suspect it is because it is a 3AB (6.3 x 32 mm) rather than a 5 x 20 mm.

 

[Tim Facer]

I know its been a while since you originally posted this phase90 but I would be interested in knowing how you resolved this. I am having the same issue.

 

[phase90]

I ended up using the fuse. It was accepted without any issues with the cUSus certification. The fuse was a Schurter SHT series.