The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums
MEDDEV 2.7/1 r4 vs. IMDRF/SaMD WG/N41
Please read this thread...
Software update
MEDDEV 2.7/1 r4 vs. IMDRF/SaMD WG/N41
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > > >
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

MEDDEV 2.7/1 r4 vs. IMDRF/SaMD WG/N41

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Courtesy Quick Links


Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services


Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC



International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

AIAG - Automotive Industry Action Group

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Organization for Standardization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags
class ii medical device, imdrf (international medical devices regulators forum), meddev - ec guidelines on medical devices, software medical devices
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 3rd January 2018, 10:14 AM
tb3625

 
 
Total Posts: 8
Please Help! MEDDEV 2.7/1 r4 vs. IMDRF/SaMD WG/N41

We have written our clinical evaluation work instructions to comply with MEDDEV 2.7/1 r4.

I'm now trying to figure out how IMDRF/SaMD WG/N41 fits in to all of this.

While the verbiage is different, it appears to refer to the same concepts. What I'm really struggling with is whether I must now require our medical device teams to write a definition statement and be labeled with another category.

The majority of our software devices are class II for FDA and class IIb for CE Mark.

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 22nd January 2018, 02:10 PM
yodon

 
 
Total Posts: 1,158
Re: MEDDEV 2.7/1 r4 vs. IMDRF/SaMD WG/N41

(Sorry for not replying sooner)

If you have software that is a stand-alone medical device, it is required to comply with the standards / regulations; one of which is the requirement for the clinical evaluation. (Bear in mind that the MDD / MDR is the regulation, the MEDDEV is guidance to help you comply, and IMDRF is just a group trying to help make sense of it all and push the industry in what they feel is the right direction).

You should end up with a Clinical Evaluation Report for your stand-alone software device that complies with the regulations.
Thanks to yodon for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #3  
Old 6th April 2018, 09:26 AM
kreid

 
 
Total Posts: 57
Re: MEDDEV 2.7/1 r4 vs. IMDRF/SaMD WG/N41

IMDRF/SaMD WG/N41 gives you the opportunity to include your software V&V as part of the evidence to justify that you e SaMD is clinically appropriate/valid.
Thanks to kreid for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #4  
Old 9th April 2018, 04:37 AM
FoGia

 
 
Total Posts: 44
Re: MEDDEV 2.7/1 r4 vs. IMDRF/SaMD WG/N41

Isn't that the case for the MEDDEV as well? I know the wording could be more explicit but following the MEDDEV one can rely on pre-clinical testing to support a clinical evaluation.
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > > >

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
IEC 62304 vs. IMDRF SaMD Guideline Risk Class WimVr IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 5 13th August 2018 05:08 AM
NB-MED, NBOG, IMDRF and MEDDEV hierarchy SteveK EU Medical Device Regulations 3 1st March 2017 07:21 PM
IMDRF document - Application of QMS to SaMD Marcelo Antunes ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2 30th December 2014 02:28 PM
Clinical Data Report - Literature Route - MEDDEV guidance (MEDDEV 2.7.1) LMU23 EU Medical Device Regulations 22 13th December 2013 05:13 AM
IMDRF Feb/Mar 2012 Meeting - Outcome Statement Ronen E Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 9 18th October 2012 05:49 AM



The time now is 10:18 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



Misc. Internal Links


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"