The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Continuous Improvement Techniques
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Continuous Improvement Techniques
Continuous Improvement Techniques
Continuous Improvement Techniques
Continuous Improvement Techniques
Continuous Improvement Techniques
Continuous Improvement Techniques
Continuous Improvement Techniques
Continuous Improvement Techniques
Continuous Improvement Techniques
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > >
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Continuous Improvement Techniques - Page 2


Elsmar XML RSS Feed
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services


Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC



International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Organization for Standardization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags
continuous improvement
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  Post Number #9  
Old 20th November 1998, 05:14 PM
Marc's Avatar
Marc

 
 
Total Posts: 26,035
Not a thing I can add. All of you have answered in great detail and quite eloquently.

Thanks to everyone. Your participation is what makes these forums valuable to all of us!

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #10  
Old 25th November 1998, 01:26 AM
Leslie Garon

 
 
Total Posts: n/a
Only one thing to add,

Percision = Exactness
Accuracy = Proximity, within parameters

Remember what your goal is.
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #11  
Old 12th December 1998, 08:22 AM
Bryon C Simmons

 
 
Total Posts: n/a
What I do to satisy Continuous Improvement requirements....I have concentrated on manufacturing processes...we have recently upgraded some machinery...I was able to glean unscheduled downtime numbers before and after the conversions, from our PM programs.....saw an average decrease of MTBF of 50%....with a corresponding increase in run efficiency....translated this into $$$$$$ for management review....the auditor in our very recent Third Edition upgrade surveillance loved it. He told me the focus (and intent, ultimately), of the CI requirement is to be able to quantify the improvement with cost savings, etc.

Hope this helps.....



------------------
Bryon Simmons
ASQ: CQE, CQA; CQMgr
  Post Number #12  
Old 17th October 2000, 09:50 AM
Marc's Avatar
Marc

 
 
Total Posts: 26,035
Question

Anyone see any change(s) in the evolution of the definition of continuous improvement?

Does anyone have a stand-alone Continuous Improvement procedure?

Also see: http://Elsmar.com/ubb/Forum2/HTML/000036.html
and http://Elsmar.com/ubb/Forum31/HTML/000023.html

[This message has been edited by Marc Smith (edited 17 October 2000).]
  Post Number #13  
Old 17th October 2000, 06:32 PM
Al Dyer

 
 
Total Posts: n/a
Lightbulb

Mark,

I emailed you a stand alone. If it didn't go through, email me and I will use another account.

Regards,

ASD...

------------------
Al Dyer
  Post Number #14  
Old 19th October 2000, 12:17 AM
Marc's Avatar
Marc

 
 
Total Posts: 26,035
Thumbs up

I got it and did send you a thanks via e-mail. It looked like a different e-mail than you usually use.

In a way, I guess this wasn't the appropriate forum to post this in. As much as anything else, I'm wondering how many folks have 'stand alone' procedures for PA. But, I was thinking ISO which is not as strict as QS here. I've never used a stand-alone in an ISO registration. Tricky situation coming up. Have a client who will be going through the registration audit with an RAB witness. The registrar has never registered this kind of business (insurance) and so there's going to be a lot of 'checking it twice' going on. But by that token, I'll bet the RAB witness hasn't either.... Hopefully we'll work out all issues during the pre-assessment.

[This message has been edited by Marc Smith (edited 18 October 2000).]
  Post Number #15  
Old 3rd November 2000, 08:09 PM
vamoore

 
 
Total Posts: n/a
Question

During our continuous assessment to QS this week, I ran into an interesting one. The auditor was asking about 4.2.5 Continuous Improvement. After looking for a separate continuous improvement project to address quality, service, and price he asked if we had any special characteristics. We have a few (3) internally identified on the control plan but not customer requested, so I said yes. Then he asked for a continuous improvement project on a special characteristic. Well, we do not have any currently open, so that is how we answered. This resulted in a minor finding (No objective evidence of CI in special characteristic) which then led into a "lively" discussion where several things were said that concern me. First, the auditor said he had to see an open active project, we could not show a project closed in the last year. Then we asked if the special characteristic has a high cpk of say around 6, then would he still need to see a project and he said yes, we can always improve. We asked could we show a prioritized plan for CI and indicate that the project was not feasible due to high cpk and focus on another product characteristic that was also stable and capable but not as high a cpk and he said no. I had interpreted the standard to say shall have CI on product characteristics and then the ones that are special move to the top, but the auditor said that the standard clearly says shall have CI on special characteristics.

So now I am trying to figure out how to respond. If we had 15 special characteristics would we need a CI project open on each one? If we open a project, then it has to have highest priority, so then we work on it first, close it and have to immediately open a new one.... isn't that a perpetual loop where no other CI projects would get addressed.

What do you think? How have some of you addressed this requirement? I know the best thing would be to get rid of the special characteristics but I doubt I can do that. We have talked about appealing but I am trying to figure out if the standard does not make sense or the interpretation by the auditor. Any ideas on how I should respond?

Thanks,
Vamoore
  Post Number #16  
Old 4th November 2000, 07:38 AM
e.s.deo

 
 
Total Posts: n/a
Hi there!

I have gone through the discussion and I wish to draw attention to some more aspects…..

QS9000 requires… continuous improvements to be extended to product characteristics with an emphasis on special characteristics…

This does not mean only SCs to be considered for CIP and hence does not isolate other characteristics from being considered if it makes a business sense!

Further the improvements have to be in quality, service and price…
( cost elements to be one of the key indicators..)

The examples given in the standard for continuous improvement projects can definitely be used as guidance…Page no.19 of QS9000.

Meeting the required process capability is a basic requirement for such activities to be classified as continuous improvements.
However, there will be many situations which do not have process capability tracking.. e.g. unscheduled down time, machine changeover time. Less than 100% first run capability..etc.

The intent is meet the basic requirements first before the same can be called “continuous improvement”.
Thus, wherever the operations are tracked by SPC studies and are below par, those have to be corrected first to meet the minimum specified requirements and then further improved thereon…

Now to some thoughts on this issue about implementation…

You may have, as an organization, some focus points e.g. excessive cycle time reduction

Now for this, in your company you may have an MIS implemented for tracking the cycle times of various operations.

The data generated over a period can be analysed....

Use various statistical techniques to identify the opportunities for reduction of the same..
Target those processes ..
The continuous improvement project can take birth as above ….

Now use appropriate statistical tools to decide about the actions required to be implemented…
Implement the actions and use further aspects as what are normally done in case of a continuous improvement project

The balance can be left to the team.
I close here.

Thanks
e.s.deo
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > >

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Which improvement tool/approach do you adopt for driving Continuous Improvement? v9991 Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 3 16th May 2012 02:11 PM
CI (Continuous Improvement) Tools and Techniques - What is the state of the art? Bayne Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 4 7th June 2011 10:51 AM
Continuous Improvement Toons wanted for Continuous Improvement Awareness Week CI-Walk the talk Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement 2 12th November 2008 01:56 AM
Continuous Improvement Tools - Why do continuous improvement efforts fail BRoyal Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement 18 9th June 2006 06:21 PM
Continual Improvement vs. Continuous Improvement - Terminology Semantics Jimmy Olson ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 16 9th September 2002 06:37 AM



The time now is 06:23 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


 
 
 


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"