The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Continual Improvement - What is CI and what is CI not?
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Continual Improvement - What is CI and what is CI not?
Continual Improvement - What is CI and what is CI not?
Continual Improvement - What is CI and what is CI not?
Continual Improvement - What is CI and what is CI not?
Continual Improvement - What is CI and what is CI not?
Continual Improvement - What is CI and what is CI not?
Continual Improvement - What is CI and what is CI not?
Continual Improvement - What is CI and what is CI not?
Continual Improvement - What is CI and what is CI not?
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > >
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Continual Improvement - What is CI and what is CI not?


Elsmar XML RSS Feed
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services


Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC



International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Organization for Standardization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 4th June 2004, 08:12 AM
Jim Howe

 
 
Total Posts: 412
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by WALLACE

Jim,
If you're open to analysing and using the ISO 9004 model. You may wish to use the 9004 model as your benchmark for current and future process definitions and opportunities for improvement.
Just my thoughts.
Wallace.
Thanks Wallace, you have been a great help. We are open to all suggestions! In a recent mailer from my local ASQ section a consulting service placed an article that talks about the continual improvement cycle. It states that "Auditors need to be aware of what continual improvement is and what it is not." I dont know if this should be a new thread or not but I pose this question to you and the whole gang at the cove.
What is continual improvement vs what is not? Any takers? The consultant did not offer any further explanation.

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 4th June 2004, 08:21 AM
RoxaneB's Avatar
RoxaneB

 
 
Total Posts: 2,986
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Jim Howe

Thanks Wallace, you have been a great help. We are open to all suggestions! In a recent mailer from my local ASQ section a consulting service placed an article that talks about the continual improvement cycle. It states that "Auditors need to be aware of what continual improvement is and what it is not." I dont know if this should be a new thread or not but I pose this question to you and the whole gang at the cove.
What is continual improvement vs what is not? Any takers? The consultant did not offer any further explanation.
I like the idea of a new thread for this...CI is not limited to audit results alone.
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #3  
Old 4th June 2004, 08:30 AM
RoxaneB's Avatar
RoxaneB

 
 
Total Posts: 2,986
Question Continual Improvement - What is CI and what is CI not?

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Jim Howe

In a recent mailer from my local ASQ section a consulting service placed an article that talks about the continual improvement cycle. It states that "Auditors need to be aware of what continual improvement is and what it is not." I dont know if this should be a new thread or not but I pose this question to you and the whole gang at the cove.
What is continual improvement vs what is not? Any takers? The consultant did not offer any further explanation.
Couldn't resist starting a new thread for this. It started of in a thread discussing Continual Improvement (CI) from audit results. My opinion is that CI is not just limited to audit results alone, so I thought I'd start a new (yet related) discussion.

To me, CI is raising the level of performance....but first you need to know what your performance capability is.

Again I'll say "There can be no improvement without first establishing routine."

If there is a problem in the conducting of Routine Practices - be it found during an Internal/External Audit, monitoring/measuring of process/product, etc. - CI is not an option. Routine means establishing a consistent level of performance with consistent results. No consistency ensures that there is no foundation upon which to improve.

Once the Routine is consistently under control, then we can focus on Improvement to the Process. The data collected from the Routine Process shows how we are doing....Improvement is the analysis to show us what we can do.


I always think of a line from a Star Trek movie....Chekov and Sulu are in a forest and Chekov states that they're lost. Sulu's response is something like "Alright, I admit it. We're lost. But at least we're making good time."

If the data is showing that we have an out-of-control process, requirements are not being met, and/or results are inconsistent....we can not determine what we are capable of or where we can be, seeing as we do not even know where we are.
  Post Number #4  
Old 4th June 2004, 09:13 AM
The Taz!'s Avatar
The Taz!

 
 
Total Posts: 499
Your analysis is no different than improving a manufacturing process through statistical techniques. You first have to wring out all special causes or sources of abnormal variation. Once you have done that, you have a process that should be stable and only showing indications of normal variation.

A process for systemic processes is essentially the same. . . you have to have a stable and standardized process that is in control. One technique that is used is "Standard Work". . . or a standardized methodology that all players use.

Once you have a stable and consistent process, you can implement a change and see the effect of that change. Without that level playing field, any changes made will be hidden in all the "noise" induced by NOT being stable and standardized. This is not a new concept but has been around for a long time. Unlike a manufacturing process though, the effect will show up over time, and needs to be monitored for effectiveness (The CHECK).

JMHO

Last edited by The Taz!; 4th June 2004 at 09:16 AM.
  Post Number #5  
Old 4th June 2004, 09:25 AM
Claes Gefvenberg's Avatar
Claes Gefvenberg

 
 
Total Posts: 4,952
Quid Pro Quo

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Jim Howe

I dont know if this should be a new thread or not but I pose this question to you and the whole gang at the cove.
What is continual improvement vs what is not? Any takers?
That subject should be worth a thread of its own. Here we are: Over to the group...

/Claes

Added later... Oops! Rox beat me to it, so I merged the posts I split from Continuous Improvement from Audit Results into this one instead. Sorry about any confusion caused by this.
  Post Number #6  
Old 4th June 2004, 10:06 AM
WALLACE's Avatar
WALLACE

 
 
Total Posts: 759
I'm nearly finished reading through a book titled Kaizen by Masaaki Imai
ISNB # 0-07-554332-X.
This publication has again challenged me to take another look at the various formats, tools and techniques of (What we commonly term) CI.

CI is many things to many people. The cultural aspect to CI is very important and, the reason (I believe) why the Japanese form of CI (Kaizen) has been so successfull is that, Japanese culture is so Homogenized.
Roxane quoted "There can be no improvement without first establishing routine." I agree totaly. Look at the the Homogenized manner of the Japanes culture and glean something from that regarding infusing routine (Read standardization).
The Kaizen model is an excellent model for benchmarking. I have to say that, as I read through the book, I became aware that the Ford Production System (FPS) has indeed been benchmarked on the Kaizen model.
Homogenizing or standardizing operating processes and procedures using a CI measure by, continuously assessing the process and procedural capabilities by cross functional work groups is IMO FWIW the way to go.
One discussion forum in the UK states that, After initial assessment of process and procedural capabilities in relation to system have been mapped out, it then becomes neccessary to De-fragment (Unfragment) a system. This is IMO the key to CI. This is where Continuous improvement and the use of basic statistical tools works hand in hand.
Attached is a visual that I worked on through a quality work group. the visual speaks of Fast track improvements and, after looking at the visual again (After reading the book), I realize that, the Kaizen aspect is eveident throughout the visual.
Wallace.
Attached Files: 1. Scan for viruses before opening, 2. Please report any 'bad' files by Reporting this post, 3. Use at your Own Risk.
File Type: zip Fast track improvements.zip (207.1 KB, 628 views)
File Type: pdf Fast track improvements.pdf (184.8 KB, 844 views)

Last edited by WALLACE; 4th June 2004 at 10:19 AM.
Thank You to WALLACE for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #7  
Old 4th June 2004, 10:16 AM
Hershal's Avatar
Hershal

 
 
Total Posts: 2,498
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by RCBeyette

I like the idea of a new thread for this...CI is not limited to audit results alone.
I agree. Audits are a monitoring tool to keep track of how you are doing......like when your pulse is checked.

The real improvement comes from people. Management can and certainly should support, lead, and provide input, but the folks doing the work often have the best ideas of how to get things done. Now, sometimes they can use a little help to get things done and make sure that the idea/method complies with the organization's requirements.

Improvements should also be reviewed in Management Review, and translated into currency-speak.....after all, one has to keep Exec Management interested, and their job is to make money for the organization.

A little recognition for the folks suggesting and imlementing the improvements should also be a part of CI.

Just my thoughts.

Hershal
  Post Number #8  
Old 4th June 2004, 10:25 AM
Rob Nix's Avatar
Rob Nix

 
 
Total Posts: 653
I hope I'm in the right thread now Claes...

I'll start with this:

Continous Improvement - Perpetual (Webster = "uninterupted extension") improvement made every day, hour, and minute. This term was unrealistic and therefore changed in the standards to continual improvement.

Continual Improvement - Non-ceasing (Webster = "recurring in steady succession") acts to enhance value, excellence, quality, or simply: to make things better than they were before.

Instead of it being an entity of its own in an organization, e.g. having its own procedure or "process" or other such thing, it should be an evident and intrinsic part of the management environment. A chief goal of top management should be that no process in the organization ever stagnate. Everything must get better over time.

Evidence of continual improvement can then be found in MANY areas:
- Strategic Business Planning
- Benchmarking
- Training & Education Initiatives
- Corrective & Preventive Actions
- Audit OFIs
- SPC
- Reliability Growth
- Waste reduction
- ETC.

Anyway, these are my thoughts. I look forward to more on this.
Thank You to Rob Nix for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > >

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Continuous Improvement and Continual Improvement - Differences rcm_mech Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations 21 26th October 2010 07:41 AM
Continual Improvement Book ccochran Book, Video, Blog and Web Site Reviews and Recommendations 14 24th December 2007 03:18 AM
The Continual Improvement Process (vs. Continuous Improvement?) Marc Book, Video, Blog and Web Site Reviews and Recommendations 6 7th May 2004 11:06 PM
Continual Improvement vs. Continuous Improvement - Terminology Semantics Jimmy Olson ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 16 9th September 2002 06:37 AM
How many improvement/continual improvement/continually improvement in ISO 9001 s_warin ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1 13th August 2002 08:11 AM



The time now is 04:01 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


 
 
 


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"