The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums
Process Owner role in Problem Investigation/Corrective Action
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Process Owner role in Problem Investigation/Corrective Action
Process Owner role in Problem Investigation/Corrective Action
Process Owner role in Problem Investigation/Corrective Action
Process Owner role in Problem Investigation/Corrective Action
Process Owner role in Problem Investigation/Corrective Action
Process Owner role in Problem Investigation/Corrective Action
Process Owner role in Problem Investigation/Corrective Action
Process Owner role in Problem Investigation/Corrective Action
Process Owner role in Problem Investigation/Corrective Action
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > >
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Process Owner role in Problem Investigation/Corrective Action


Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services


Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC



International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

AIAG - Automotive Industry Action Group

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Organization for Standardization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags
corrective action (ca), process owner, responsibilities
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 18th July 2013, 04:18 AM
Sardokar's Avatar
Sardokar

 
 
Total Posts: 110
Please Help! Process Owner role in Problem Investigation/Corrective Action

Hello

I work as a quality coordinator for an IT company ( provides IT solutions and services to customers)

Recently we have decided to modify the way we work on problem investigation and corrective actions ,and i would like your opinions and advice

The old way was that when a problem occurs the quality coordinator investigated with all involved departments on the causes of the problem , then a meeting would happen when the "full picture" (root causes) of the problem was clear and we would try to find corrective actions .

Several Serious Problems appeared:

* Departments/department managers started thinking that investigation of a problem was the quality team job ( even if the poroblem affected their department/process)

* No real effort was made by department managers to find corrective actions during the meeting ...so the quality team ended most of the time proposing corrective actions , and the department managers just "noded"

* Corrective actions taken were not always remembered( after a while) or even known by some of the employees of relevant departments


To this end we want to change the way we work as thus :

- Quality team analyses the problem and if serious enough transmits it to the department manager( or department managers if more than one)

- department manager appoints employees or inevstigates himself root cause of problem. After this they submit proposed corrective actions to quality team

-quality team assesses proposed corrective actions and agrees with departments on deadline to judge effectiveness

...


That's the summary of the new method ,,,but a few objections were raised :

* if we have a complaint about Late delivery of a product , who should be the process owner /who should investigate ? Is it the sales manager ? the Logistics team ?

* if more than one process involved in the problem , how should things go? Who should coordinate the investigation and solution finding


Please any opinion/comment is appreciated ... we are trying to improve the Corrective action process

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 18th July 2013, 07:28 PM
kgott

 
 
Total Posts: 1,027
Re: Process Owner role in Problem Investigation/Corrective Action

In my opinion, if you want to solve the problem you describe get out of the way. The problems you have described are the results of getting in between the process owner and the problem fix.

Problems belong to the person who is accountable to the main person for the processes that produces the goods and services (and the problems.)

Your role is to make sure the approved way of dealing with such problems is followed, to provide whatever help and assistance to the process owner and their people you can. This may be suggesting solutions, course of action, training etc but that is all.

If the process owners wont take responsibility for problems its a management leadership issue and not your responsibility.

Your job job is to support them only, that's all.

Some line management people love to shove their problems off on to someone else and quality and safety people are usually common targets.
  Post Number #3  
Old 18th July 2013, 10:11 PM
Sidney Vianna's Avatar
Sidney Vianna

 
 
Total Posts: 9,340
Re: Process Owner role in Problem Investigation/Corrective Action

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by kgott View Post

If the process owners wont take responsibility for problems its a management leadership issue and not your responsibility.

Your job job is to support them only, that's all.
The thing is: sometimes a problem might have multiple contributors and most "sophisticated root cause analysis methodologies (i.e. those that take more than 60 seconds to reach a conclusion) call for multi-disciplinary teams, what obviously is unrealistic for many corrective actions.

For example, when the OP mentioned
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Sardokar View Post

if we have a complaint about Late delivery of a product , who should be the process owner /who should investigate ? Is it the sales manager ? the Logistics team ?

if more than one process involved in the problem , how should things go? Who should coordinate the investigation and solution finding
Late deliveries might be due to many reasons, such as:
  1. sales people misleading a customer to make a sale
  2. purchasing being late in procuring raw materials for a job
  3. equipment downtime, due to poor maintenance
  4. poor production planning/scheduling
  5. supplier long lead times
  6. poor inventory accuracy
  7. shortages
  8. blackouts/strikes etc.
  9. transportation snafu

So, sometimes, someone has to coordinate the whole effort.
  Post Number #4  
Old 19th July 2013, 12:13 AM
Wes Bucey's Avatar
Wes Bucey

 
 
Total Posts: 11,156
Re: Process Owner role in Problem Investigation/Corrective Action

That someone really needs to have some real authority (derived or deputized from a top line boss) to compel folks to contribute input into the multi-disciplinary approach (engineers, purchasing agents, maintenance folk, production folk, shipping clerks, etc.) as well as have a comprehensive view of the entire operation to
be able to envision the interactions between processes and develop workarounds when one link in the chain gets kinked.

Organizations which incorporate Deming's System of Profound Knowledge (SoPK) are lucky in that they usually don't have one department shirking their share of the task, nor, conversely, trying to take all the glory. The best part of SoPK is there will be many who are "able to envision the interactions between processes and develop workarounds when one link in the chain gets kinked."
  Post Number #5  
Old 2nd August 2013, 12:26 PM
Sardokar's Avatar
Sardokar

 
 
Total Posts: 110
Re: Process Owner role in Problem Investigation/Corrective Action

thank you

so if for example the problem is a late delivery and the causes are multi-departmental , (sales delivery terms, purchasing sent supplier PO late, supplier delivered to us with delays,internal goods clearing problem...)

who would be the process owner? who would be in charge of investigation and finding the right corrective actions ?

is the process owner one person ? if not what would prevent people from laying blame on each others and refusing to change the way they work ?

thanks for the help
  Post Number #6  
Old 2nd August 2013, 12:52 PM
Jim Wynne's Avatar
Jim Wynne

 
 
Total Posts: 14,198
Re: Process Owner role in Problem Investigation/Corrective Action

If you have a group of responsible people and they can't be trusted to get together and solve a problem, you have a different problem. It means that someone above that level has failed.
Thank You to Jim Wynne for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #7  
Old 2nd August 2013, 01:30 PM
somashekar's Avatar
somashekar

 
 
Total Posts: 5,354
Re: Process Owner role in Problem Investigation/Corrective Action

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Sardokar View Post

thank you

so if for example the problem is a late delivery and the causes are multi-departmental , (sales delivery terms, purchasing sent supplier PO late, supplier delivered to us with delays,internal goods clearing problem...)

who would be the process owner? who would be in charge of investigation and finding the right corrective actions ?

is the process owner one person ? if not what would prevent people from laying blame on each others and refusing to change the way they work ?

thanks for the help
Your company is the bigger process owner, and someone who steers the company gets the prick (if escalated) and begins to demand action.
Before the escalation happens, some responsible manager's chair will begin to prick most in your example problem.
Who will it be ?
  Post Number #8  
Old 2nd August 2013, 02:24 PM
PaulJSmith's Avatar
PaulJSmith

 
 
Total Posts: 562
Re: Process Owner role in Problem Investigation/Corrective Action

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Sardokar View Post

...what would prevent people from laying blame on each others and refusing to change the way they work ?
One of the greatest benefits you can provide to your organization would be to steer them in a more positive direction by redirecting those thoughts of blaming someone into thoughts of "How can we prevent this from happening again?" Blame is only effective as a punitive tool. The goal should be to eliminate errors, not punish for them.

Try approaching them from that angle, and I think you might see a very different response.
Thanks to PaulJSmith for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > >

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Owner of Company Doesn't Understand Corrective Action.... NikkiQSM Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 12 17th September 2012 09:50 PM
Integrating the FMEA process with problem investigation/RCA process and PFMEA v9991 FMEA and Control Plans 4 17th February 2009 04:19 AM
No "Process Owner" for the Control Plan - Who to cite in a corrective action? vanputten FMEA and Control Plans 10 4th November 2005 11:51 AM
Multi-Level CA (corrective action) Process? Levels of investigation, reply deadline fuzzy Nonconformance and Corrective Action 4 19th October 2005 10:24 AM
5 Whys Corrective Action Investigation - Late PPAP intermet Nonconformance and Corrective Action 11 28th April 2004 08:38 AM



The time now is 05:47 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



Misc. Internal Links


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"