The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums
Do I need to approach galvanized steel sheet flatness issue with DOE?
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Do I need to approach galvanized steel sheet flatness issue with DOE?
Do I need to approach galvanized steel sheet flatness issue with DOE?
Do I need to approach galvanized steel sheet flatness issue with DOE?
Do I need to approach galvanized steel sheet flatness issue with DOE?
Do I need to approach galvanized steel sheet flatness issue with DOE?
Do I need to approach galvanized steel sheet flatness issue with DOE?
Do I need to approach galvanized steel sheet flatness issue with DOE?
Do I need to approach galvanized steel sheet flatness issue with DOE?
Do I need to approach galvanized steel sheet flatness issue with DOE?
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > >
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Do I need to approach galvanized steel sheet flatness issue with DOE?


Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services


Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC



International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

AIAG - Automotive Industry Action Group

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Organization for Standardization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags
design of experiments (doe), steel plating
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 28th February 2018, 08:27 PM
Nath2892

 
 
Total Posts: 8
Question Do I need to approach galvanized steel sheet flatness issue with DOE?

Hi there! So we have a galvanized steel sheet coming from a punching machine and then going to flattner. Even after going through flattner we still have flatness issues and its not meeting customer specifications. I was planning to do DOE using rolling speed, no of times a sheet is rolled, roller pressure as factors and with 2-3 levels. Do you think this is a better idea in figuring out optimal combination of factors or do i need to accept that there's a inherent fault in machine and it's simply not capable to produce good parts anymore? I really need some guidance in solving this issue. Please help!

Thank you!

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 28th February 2018, 08:53 PM
Golfman25

 
 
Total Posts: 1,393
Re: Do I need to approach galvanized steel sheet flatness issue with DOE?

Good parts anymore?

If that is the case, what has changed?

I would start with the spec itself. How flat?
  Post Number #3  
Old 1st March 2018, 09:27 AM
Miner's Avatar
Miner

 
 
Total Posts: 4,314
Look! Re: Do I need to approach galvanized steel sheet flatness issue with DOE?

Never give up. Consider following two paths. If, as you say, the process formerly produced good product, follow a problem solving strategy (as suggested) to determine what changed.

You can also follow an exploratory strategy using DOE to determine which control factors are important. However, I recommend starting with a screening DOE at 2 levels with a couple of center points. After you narrow the field, you can go into modeling and optimization.
  Post Number #4  
Old 1st March 2018, 01:08 PM
Nath2892

 
 
Total Posts: 8
Re: Do I need to approach galvanized steel sheet flatness issue with DOE?

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Golfman25 View Post

Good parts anymore?

If that is the case, what has changed?

I would start with the spec itself. How flat?
Thanks for the reply. We are trying to figure out what has changed and I need some directions on how to investigate what has changed. Overall flatness spec should be within half inch. Currently we running over an inch flatness requirement.
  Post Number #5  
Old 1st March 2018, 01:16 PM
Nath2892

 
 
Total Posts: 8
Re: Do I need to approach galvanized steel sheet flatness issue with DOE?

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Miner View Post

Never give up. Consider following two paths. If, as you say, the process formerly produced good product, follow a problem solving strategy (as suggested) to determine what changed.

You can also follow an exploratory strategy using DOE to determine which control factors are important. However, I recommend starting with a screening DOE at 2 levels with a couple of center points. After you narrow the field, you can go into modeling and optimization.
Thank you very much for your advice and encouragement. That was very informative.
  Post Number #6  
Old 1st March 2018, 04:49 PM
Golfman25

 
 
Total Posts: 1,393
Re: Do I need to approach galvanized steel sheet flatness issue with DOE?

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Nath2892 View Post

Thanks for the reply. We are trying to figure out what has changed and I need some directions on how to investigate what has changed. Overall flatness spec should be within half inch. Currently we running over an inch flatness requirement.
With that big of change, I'm not sure I would do DOE. I'd stick with a basic root cause analysis -- method, machine, people, etc.

Just a hunch, but it sounds like something is broken. Take a look at the equipment.
  Post Number #7  
Old 6th April 2018, 09:33 AM
kzachawk's Avatar
kzachawk

 
 
Total Posts: 27
Re: Do I need to approach galvanized steel sheet flatness issue with DOE?

Holy Cow.... a DOE on a machine which cannot hold tolerance? I would not think so.....
Think Simple....
All failure is the result of variation occurring related to requirements and expectations.

Therefore if your machine was ever able to produce conforming parts after setup, then at what point do those parts start to vary from setup?

Most manufacturing sets machines 3 sigma inside the tolerance range and then uses a simple tool such as SPC to maintain machine setup, by observing machine drift during operation.

Your problem is really that simple....

Is the machine setup to achieve tolerance 3 sigma within the bell curve of the specification?

At what point using SPC does it drift away from setup?

The obvious answer here relates to three things
1. Your initial setup is too close to spec
2. Your machine is moving around during operation (Variation from setting)
3. Your machine operators/managers/supervisors are monkeying around with the controls during operation. (again causing variation)

Set an SPC control on the machine and require operators, managers, supervisors to log all changes .... then you will observe where the variation is occurring. Sometimes employees must be restricted from changing settings (locket out) The SPC chart will instruct that change is occurring and therefore a reset to setup is necessary.

A DOE is not warranted unless you have data which indicates the machine is incapable of producing any conforming components for the customer. If its ever produced one conforming part it can produce two ... its just a machine it only does what humans tell it to do.
  Post Number #8  
Old 6th April 2018, 10:34 AM
Ninja's Avatar
Ninja

 
 
Total Posts: 975
Re: Do I need to approach galvanized steel sheet flatness issue with DOE?

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Golfman25 View Post

With that big of change, I'm not sure I would do DOE. I'd stick with a basic root cause analysis -- method, machine, people, etc.

Just a hunch, but it sounds like something is broken. Take a look at the equipment.
Agreed. That's a big change.

I would start with the machine operators...not in "What are you doing?", but in "What changed with the equipment? What do you see different now that didn't happen before?"
If it changed that much, someone likely saw it happen.

I would also look at the feedstock to make sure that didn't change in some way.
(Wound tighter, smaller ID core, thicker, stiffer, etc.)
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > >

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Corrosion Quality Issue Root Cause - Electro Galvanized CRS - 0.8mm praveen011281 Problem Solving, Root Cause Fault and Failure Analysis 11 25th February 2009 04:34 AM
Resistance Welder Settings for cold rolled and galvanized steel keithm696 - 2008 Manufacturing and Related Processes 3 3rd July 2006 09:56 AM
Seek Corrosion-resistance Data for Galvanized and Galvannealed steel roland_lu Manufacturing and Related Processes 1 23rd June 2006 04:23 PM
Capability studies in Process Plants - E-coat of galvanized flat carbon steel coils FlavioLima Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 1 15th March 2006 04:14 PM
E-coat on Galvanized Steel parts - Visible and irregular texture on the surfaces roland_lu Manufacturing and Related Processes 7 21st February 2006 07:43 AM



The time now is 12:44 PM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



Misc. Internal Links


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"