The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis > Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools / Solutions > Using Minitab Software
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Propagation of Errors in Calculations - Thickness of a coating material inside a tube


Elsmar XML RSS Feed
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links that Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:

International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Standards Organization - ISO Standards and Information

Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags (Not all threads are Tagged)
measurement (general)
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 23rd April 2012, 05:09 PM
Brad Gover

 
 
Total Posts: 37
Please Help! Propagation of Errors in Calculations - Thickness of a coating material inside a tube

Hi All, I have a problem in calculating the thickness of a coating material inside a tube. The tubes inside diameter is measured before and after coating. The coating thickness is calculated by substracting the diameters and dividing by two to get the thickness of the coated material. The before coat diameter is 0.3949". The after coat diameter is 0.3893". The Total Gage R&R standard deviation is 0.000127". I need to calculate the coating thickness value and its associated error.

I am thinking the thickness without error = (0.3949 - 0.3893)/2 = 0.0028"
The associated error from the resulting calculation would be

Error = [5.15 * (0.0001272 + 0.000127 2).5]/2 = 0.000462
I would record the thickness as 0.0028 0.000462?

I saw some examples where they standard deviation was used in place of the 5.15 multiplier value i.e., 0.0028 0.00018. I would think this would only capture some 66% of the uncertainty.
P.S. I used Big 3 MSA value of 5.15 instead of 6
Thanks, Brad






Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 24th April 2012, 03:25 AM
Stijloor's Avatar
Stijloor

 
 
Total Posts: 15,186
Re: Propagation of Errors in Calculations - Thickness of a coating material inside a

A Quick Bump!

Can someone help Brad?

Thank you very much!!

Stijloor.
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #3  
Old 25th April 2012, 07:46 AM
Stijloor's Avatar
Stijloor

 
 
Total Posts: 15,186
Re: Propagation of Errors in Calculations - Thickness of a coating material inside a

Again A Quick Bump!

Can someone help?

Thank you very much!!

Stijloor.
  Post Number #4  
Old 25th April 2012, 10:26 AM
AdamP's Avatar
AdamP

 
 
Total Posts: 97
Re: Propagation of Errors in Calculations - Thickness of a coating material inside a

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by [COLOR=black

I need to calculate the coating thickness value and its associated error.[/COLOR]

I am thinking the thickness without error = (0.3949 - 0.3893)/2 = 0.0028"
The associated error from the resulting calculation would be
Error = [5.15 * (0.0001272 + 0.000127 2).5]/2 = 0.000462
I would record the thickness as 0.0028 0.000462?

HI - A couple of questions. If you're stating the margin of error around the average coating thickness I'm not sure why you've included the GRR StDEV twice. Also, the CI formula (margin of error) has us taking the Z value (here 5.15 or 6) * StDEv/SQRT of sample size - I don't see the SQRT of n in your calculation - CAn you share the actual formula you're using to express the margin of error?

Also - yeah folks have moved to using 6 rather than 5.15 as it shows a confidence level of 99.73 rather than 99.

Cheers,

Adam
  Post Number #5  
Old 25th April 2012, 11:52 AM
Brad Gover

 
 
Total Posts: 37
Re: Propagation of Errors in Calculations - Thickness of a coating material inside a

Well, I am thinking the reason I am using the standard deviation twice is we measure the ID twice and calculate the difference between the two measurements to get the thickness of the coating. i.e.,
Machined ID = 0.3955"
Coated ID = 0.3925"
Coating thickness = (Machined ID - Coating ID)/2 = (0.3955" - 0.3925")/2 = 0.003".
Each measurement is made by the same instrument and each individual measurement would induce error. In this case we made two measurements to get the coating thickness. (If I only made one measurement I think I would only use the error Std Dev once.) The first measurement error is compounded with the second measurement error when both are used in a calculation. (See attachment if I am lucky enough to have it uploaded for an explanation.) The standard deviation comes from using Minitab's Gage RR via a two factor cross random ANOVA array. We performed this using three operators and three trials with 10 parts. Thanks for the help!
Brad
Attached Files: 1. Scan for viruses before using, 2. Please report any 'bad' files by Reporting this post, 3. Use at your Own Risk.
File Type: pdf Propagation of Errors.pdf (326.8 KB, 16 views)
  Post Number #6  
Old 30th April 2012, 12:03 PM
Allattar

 
 
Total Posts: 234
Re: Propagation of Errors in Calculations - Thickness of a coating material inside a

In propagating errors you add variances, not standard deviations.

You would square both standard deviations, and then add them. Then square root to get the standard deviation of the system. In which case your error, if assuming the same standard deviation on measurements before and after becomes Std Dev * root 2.

The problem can be broken down into

Difference + Error(overall) = (Before + error(Measure) - (After + error(measure)

but my heads to frazzled today to work it further than that
Thank You to Allattar for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #7  
Old 30th April 2012, 12:28 PM
Bev D's Avatar
Bev D

 
 
Total Posts: 3,472
Re: Propagation of Errors in Calculations - Thickness of a coating material inside a

Allatar is on the right track. unfortunately AIAG has the wrong formulas for truly extracting measurement error from total observed variation. As Allater said - you do not use standard deviations you use variances.

But befroe commenting furhter, I need to ask why you want to know the measurement error? what will you do with the info? how will you use it?
the answers will provide us wiht the means for giving you a useful answer.

for example, if you aren't doing anything with the data, but are simply reporting it to your customer, then we woudl give one answer. If you were going to use it to guardband yoru measurements or develop a better measurement sytem, we would give a very different answer...
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis > Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools / Solutions > Using Minitab Software

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Calibration of Coating Thickness Standard WilliamM General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5 20th September 2013 09:40 AM
Eddy Current Coating Thickness Gage R&R Curtis317 Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 13 5th April 2013 09:25 AM
PCBA (Printed Circuit Board Assembly) Conformal Coating Material and Thickness? Nicco Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 9 11th December 2011 09:38 PM
ISO 2081 - Interpreting Coating Thickness ARM129 Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 3 17th February 2011 07:28 AM
How to choose samples for Gage R&R - Micrometer to check tube thickness RGohil Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 6 14th February 2006 12:33 PM



The time now is 04:25 PM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


 
 


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"