The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > General Metrology, Measurement Device, Calibration and Test Laboratories > ISO 17025 related Discussions
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

What point does the Accreditation begin in the process? ISO 17025


Elsmar XML RSS Feed
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links that Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:

International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Standards Organization - ISO Standards and Information

Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Related Topic Tags
accreditation (general), accreditation requirements, competency, corporate responsibility, iso 17025 - testing and calibration laboratories, responsibilities, samples and sampling plans, testing laboratories, water analysis
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 4th May 2012, 03:22 PM
JodiB's Avatar
JodiB

 
 
Total Posts: 563
Please Help! What point does the Accreditation begin in the process? ISO 17025

Here is the first of a probably long series of questions from me, as I embark down the road of getting 10 labs accredited to ISO/IEC 17025....

Background: Our labs are part of a larger organization that provides products and services. The labs test (mostly) water samples drawn from customer sites. The work is either straight analysis or it's product performance testing.

The water samples are taken by company employees who are not lab personnel. The employee pulling the sample and requesting the analysis is typically doing this to monitor the effectiveness of our products or because he wants to know which of our products would be most effective for the conditions ( to improve our service delivery or win an account, etc.). The lab considers their customer to be the company employee requesting the sample analysis, not the external customer. All results are provided to the company employee. The lab exists to service the internal customer, who exists to service the external customer.

At what point does the lab responsibility start for accreditation purposes? At the sampling point, even when not done by the lab? As a company we recognize that we want to get a grip on proper capture, label, and transport of the samples to make sure that the lab can provide quality data results. So that's not the point. What I need to know is how far back do I have to document competency, sampling plans, etc. for accreditation purposes. At what point does the lab take ownership of this under their quality system? Is it from the receipt of sample?

Last edited by JodiB; 4th May 2012 at 03:24 PM. Reason: misspelling

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 4th May 2012, 05:10 PM
Jen Kirley's Avatar
Jen Kirley

 
 
Total Posts: 5,892
Re: What point does the accreditation begin in the process?

Hi Jodie,

The lab has a list of processes it is carrying out as its scope, yes? And procedures for each of them? These are subject to accreditation. I doubt that the collection step is part of them; there is no way your lab can control purity or condition of a sample before it reaches you. So yes, you can state your responsibility starts at receipt. You would of course be expected to provide a means to receive that would not compromise the sample. That is, physical damage and temperature extremes sufficient to compromise the sample are avoided via design of the collection drop off area or receiving process.
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #3  
Old 5th May 2012, 01:48 AM
Hershal's Avatar
Hershal

 
 
Total Posts: 2,482
Re: What point does the Accreditation begin in the process? ISO 17025

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by JodiB View Post

Here is the first of a probably long series of questions from me, as I embark down the road of getting 10 labs accredited to ISO/IEC 17025....

Background: Our labs are part of a larger organization that provides products and services. The labs test (mostly) water samples drawn from customer sites. The work is either straight analysis or it's product performance testing.

The water samples are taken by company employees who are not lab personnel. The employee pulling the sample and requesting the analysis is typically doing this to monitor the effectiveness of our products or because he wants to know which of our products would be most effective for the conditions ( to improve our service delivery or win an account, etc.). The lab considers their customer to be the company employee requesting the sample analysis, not the external customer. All results are provided to the company employee. The lab exists to service the internal customer, who exists to service the external customer.

At what point does the lab responsibility start for accreditation purposes? At the sampling point, even when not done by the lab? As a company we recognize that we want to get a grip on proper capture, label, and transport of the samples to make sure that the lab can provide quality data results. So that's not the point. What I need to know is how far back do I have to document competency, sampling plans, etc. for accreditation purposes. At what point does the lab take ownership of this under their quality system? Is it from the receipt of sample?
First question, given the obvious regulatory issue is: What is/are the criteria to comply with?

Only AFTER that should the subject of an AB come up.

If this is for something like CARB or more likely, Water Sense, then there are specified ABs. Otherwise, look to ILAC and get all the ABs that accredit labs.

Now then, the REAL work begins. You have to have procedures and policies in place and implmented. Uncertainties, calibration, training, proficiency testing, internal audit, management review, on and on.

The true effort and true cost is internal.

Some things you can and should discuss with your AB.
  Post Number #4  
Old 7th May 2012, 04:45 PM
JodiB's Avatar
JodiB

 
 
Total Posts: 563
Re: What point does the Accreditation begin in the process? ISO 17025

Thanks to both of you.
Jennifer hit the right spot of what I was asking. I was specifically asking about how far back in the process I have to go. If receipt of the sample is "good enough" and I don't have to try to control / document/ etc. the sample collection activities that's what I needed to know.

If the field guys carry a sample around in their trucks for a week, the results that the lab delivers will be "accurate" as far as results that the lab reports but not necessarily "accurate" in real life. The sample could have degraded. Does that make sense? So we don't want the field guys to carry those samples around for a week, but if this is out of scope of our accrediation, then I don't know if I have a big enough stick to make them send them in promptly.

We're standardizing our field test methods (for those tests that the field engineers conduct on their own - again, these are not lab personnel) and that will include the proper sampling conditions, labeling, transport, etc. but since these are not conducted by the lab personnel and are not part of the lab services per se, I wasn't sure if they had to be covered under our accreditation. In limited situations, the lab will use some of the data that is provided by the field engineer in order to make a final interpretation, .... maybe in those situations we would need to include it? What do you think?
  Post Number #5  
Old 7th May 2012, 10:15 PM
Jen Kirley's Avatar
Jen Kirley

 
 
Total Posts: 5,892
Re: What point does the Accreditation begin in the process? ISO 17025

If you are using data supplied by field engineer, that field engineer has become part of the process and might be considered part of the scope.

When approaching this subject I am thinking of a lab I take my well water sample to when transferring property ownership or after work of some kind is done on the well. The lab provides instructions and the sampling container plus ziplock plastic bag for the sample for transport and transfer from me to the lab - as I remember it even included a light-blocking bag. This kit would be part of the scope, which covers the testing processes and not the supplied condition of the sample - the outcome bacteria count for example is not something taken into consideration for accreditation. As long as the transfer point you provide is reasonably controlled you have done your part to the extent you are able and it's assumed the bacteria count has not been affected by collection, handling and transport. As a lab your responsibility doesn't include that and a notice of some type could say as much.

To summarize, your accreditation is not presented based on test results, but on your internal controls and processes.

Last edited by Jen Kirley; 7th May 2012 at 10:21 PM.
Thanks to Jen Kirley for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #6  
Old 8th May 2012, 11:21 AM
JodiB's Avatar
JodiB

 
 
Total Posts: 563
Re: What point does the Accreditation begin in the process? ISO 17025

Thanks so much for the very clearly written guidance!
  Post Number #7  
Old 9th May 2012, 09:22 AM
Hershal's Avatar
Hershal

 
 
Total Posts: 2,482
Re: What point does the Accreditation begin in the process? ISO 17025

I had a beautifully written contribution, but am on a hotel computer in China so I should have copied as it must periodically reset.

Try tomorrow evening.
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > General Metrology, Measurement Device, Calibration and Test Laboratories > ISO 17025 related Discussions

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Is accreditation to ISO 17025 really necessary? Bunny ISO 17025 related Discussions 15 1st September 2011 09:41 PM
Are One-Point ISO 17025 Equipment Calibrations OK George Weiss ISO 17025 related Discussions 12 13th September 2010 01:58 PM
Calibration of point that is out of the range of accreditation derice General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5 12th November 2008 09:48 AM
Seeking Power Point Presentation Concerning Iso 17025 harabiat ISO 17025 related Discussions 4 19th June 2005 02:25 AM
Does ISO 17025 Require Point By Point Measurement Uncertainty on Reports? Bob Collins - 2006 ISO 17025 related Discussions 10 2nd April 2004 11:26 AM



The time now is 05:11 PM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


 
 


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies" - A Peachfarm Internet Property