The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Critical Characteristic Symbol - ASME Y14.100 Standard (Engineering Drawing Practice)


Elsmar XML RSS Feed
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services


Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC



International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Standards Organization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags (Not all threads are Tagged)
asme y14.100, critical characteristics, symbols (general)
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 26th May 1999, 08:35 PM
Marc's Avatar
Marc

 
 
Total Posts: 25,771
I Say... Critical Characteristic Symbol - ASME Y14.100 Standard (Engineering Drawing Practice)

--> Subject: DRAFTING STANDARD Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 12:41:42 -0400
--> From: dkaralash -- parker.com
--> To: Forum_Mail -- qs9000.com
-->
--> I'M LOOKING FOR INFORMATION ON A QS9000 DRAFTING STANDARD THAT
--> GOVERNS THE SYMBOL REPRESENTING A CRITICAL (GO, NO GO) TOLERANCE ON
--> A PART. THE STANDARD IS RELATED TO F.E.M.A. I WOULD APPRECIATE ANY
--> HELP YOU COULD GIVE ME ON THIS, AND WILL SUGGEST YOUR SIGHT TO MY
--> CO-WORKERS IN THE FUTURE.

There is no QS9000 'standard' critical characteristic symbol that I am aware of. Download the FMEA file in the pdf_files directory ( Elsmar Cove Free Files Directory ) and look around page 20 or so for some definitions of critical, safety and other characteristics. Also see Appendix C of QS-9000 for symbols and explainations.

Each company has it's own symbol for a critical characteristic. Ford, GM, Chrysler and probably your company. The requirement is that you recognize critical characteristics of your customers and that you identify them as appropriate in your business. If you get customer prints with critical characteristics and you 'translate' them to your 'format' and you use bowties as your symbol for a critical characteristic then those they marked should be marked with your 'bowtie' (or whatever). There is no standard which tells you any specific symbol that you must use nor is there any such requirement for a specific symbol.

[This message has been edited by Marc Smith (edited 26 May 1999).]

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 3rd November 2005, 05:52 AM
Wes Bucey's Avatar
Wes Bucey

 
 
Total Posts: 11,073
Critical characteristic drawing symbols are merely a specific "flagnote symbol" which refers to a descriptive note on the drawing.

In general practice, the drawing notes will describe a flagnote symbol specific to that drawing. The flagnote symbol is then added to each characteristic on the drawing to which that specific note applies.

Marc is correct in writing that there is no universal flagnote symbol or descriptive note for the concept: "critical characteristic."

Organizations may devise a set of flagnote symbols and corresponding text for the note which ALL designers and draftspersons within the organization shall use in a consistent manner.

Obviously, organizations come in all sizes, ranging from one person to hundreds of thousands of people. Thus, outside entities may encounter a variety of symbols as well as a variety of specific texts or definitions contained in the note to which the symbol refers. The operative advice is to pay close attention to the drawing notes and be on the lookout for any flagnotes which may signal specific customer requirements.

In actual practice, good customers will make a point of calling attention to flagnote symbols which are important to them when negotiating a contract with a supplier. Alas, most customers are not "good," so the supplier must be very vigilant about such notes during the Contract Review process.

In my experience, there are times when stray symbols are present on some drawings WITHOUT the matching note. The use of a flagnote symbol without the corresponding note is most likely an error and a definite red flag there may be other errors in the drawing. Good practice for suppliers who encounter such stray symbols WITHOUT a corresponding note is to call them to the attention of the customer BEFORE continuing to interpret the drawing.

Most likely, the symbol is important, but the note was inadvertently omitted when the drawing was redrawn with CAD.

Second most likely, a previous revision level withdrew the note, but the checkers in the Configuration Management phase of the process neglected to remove the symbols from the drawing as well.

Least likely, an incompetent designer or draftsman made an assumption that "Everyone" knew what the symbol meant since it was so common in his own organization and purposely left out the corresponding note.
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #3  
Old 3rd November 2005, 07:29 AM
Marc's Avatar
Marc

 
 
Total Posts: 25,771
Thanks for the details, Wes!
  Post Number #4  
Old 3rd November 2005, 08:27 AM
D.Scott's Avatar
D.Scott

 
 
Total Posts: 1,592
I have often seen just a symbol on the print to designate a "key" or "critical" characteristic requiring SPC. Sometimes the symbol is just rubber stamped on the print. There is, in many cases, no specific note explaining the symbol. Use of the symbol is explained in the customer specific requirements.

Dave
  Post Number #5  
Old 3rd November 2005, 11:51 AM
Wes Bucey's Avatar
Wes Bucey

 
 
Total Posts: 11,073
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by D.Scott

I have often seen just a symbol on the print to designate a "key" or "critical" characteristic requiring SPC. Sometimes the symbol is just rubber stamped on the print. There is, in many cases, no specific note explaining the symbol. Use of the symbol is explained in the customer specific requirements.

Dave
Such a practice does not correspond with the ASME Y14.100 Standard (Engineering Drawing Practice) for the use of flagnotes. All notes are required to be on the drawing to which they refer (this can be expanded in that the note only needs to be on Sheet 1 of a multi-page bundle of drawings on one product or assembly, but that requires the bundle not be disassembled and the drawings considered separately.)

Thus if the drawing has a statement "conforms to ASME Y14.100" and does not contain the note explaining a flagnote symbol, it does not conform.
  Post Number #6  
Old 17th May 2013, 07:50 AM
Kathleen1's Avatar
Kathleen1

 
 
Total Posts: 4
Please Help! Re: Critical Characteristic Symbol - ASME Y14.100 Standard (Engineering Drawing Pract

Is this answer still current- No industry standard for CTQ symbols?
I need to create an internal drafting standard for internal drawing creation and use- I was wondering if there is an industry standard for CTQ symbol?

I have multiple customers with varied symbols: Flag with CTQ, C within box or diamond, C w/line over top.
I did find ST hexagon symbol in ANSI Y14-but is it correct to use for this?

I must maintain/monitor data on inspection results for these characteristics.

My preference is leaning towards the CTQ within inside the Flag symbol.

Any information will be apreciated. Thanks in advance.
  Post Number #7  
Old 17th May 2013, 09:06 AM
Jim Wynne's Avatar
Jim Wynne

 
 
Total Posts: 14,161
Re: Critical Characteristic Symbol - ASME Y14.100 Standard (Engineering Drawing Pract

There is no universal standard. As you've found, the symbols used vary from customer to customer. Recently in dealing with a new customer, I found that the symbols for Key Product Characteristics (KPCs) used on the drawings we receive are completely different from the ones they depict as standard in their supplier quality manual, so there might also be variation within individual companies.

You should, as far as possible, use the same symbols your customers use.
Thanks to Jim Wynne for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #8  
Old 17th May 2013, 10:13 AM
Kathleen1's Avatar
Kathleen1

 
 
Total Posts: 4
Re: Critical Characteristic Symbol - ASME Y14.100 Standard (Engineering Drawing Pract

Thank you Jim -for the information & suggestion-
Since industry has no standard-I believe I will decide to maintain 1 CTQ symbol for our drawings. (unless my customer spec's require use of theirs-currently none do)

I apreciate the suggestion, ...to match my customers' symbols- but there is problem with that application for us-..
*my drafting group will need to maintain & use the correct symbol for the applicable customer.
*my QA group will need to identify multiple symbols for data collection
Also, Some of our designs are used by different customers. I do not want to have to create multiple (same item) drawings just because of a (customer specific) symbol call out -maintaining this system would lead to potential document and data reporting nonconformances.
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Does TS require WIs to have special characteristic symbol? darkafar IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8 16th September 2007 09:49 AM
Your Critical Characteristic is my Minor Concern - Characteristic out of Spec Poohbear Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3 19th July 2007 07:01 PM
Drawing (Print) Symbol - Need Help With JRKH Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 11 3rd April 2006 05:53 PM
ASME standard - Format for Drawing (Print) Title Block DocConPolice Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 7 3rd November 2005 09:25 AM
Drawing Title Blocks - Control / Number them? Engineering Drawing Practices Y14.100M Bob_M Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 14 26th September 2003 02:41 PM



The time now is 10:41 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


 
 


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"