C
CherryBlossomStorm
Our auditor is saying we need to have objective evidence of internal audits. For example, when auditing the sales department, he says we should write down the actual sales order # of the sales order processed. For auditing the warehouse, we should write down the order # and part # being processed.
I wrote down the names of the people I audited, the processes and work instructions audited, and the questions I asked them, and the results.
In the case of the sales guy, he didn't even have an order to actually process at the moment. He just walked me through what he would do if there was an order, I checked to see if it what he showed me followed our written procedure.
ISO9001:2008 8.2.2 Internal Auditing, as far as I can tell only requires you to "maintain records" of internal audits, not "objective evidence"'
This level of detail the auditor requires from internal audits seems excessive, especially for a company as small as ours. Is it truly a requirement?
I wrote down the names of the people I audited, the processes and work instructions audited, and the questions I asked them, and the results.
In the case of the sales guy, he didn't even have an order to actually process at the moment. He just walked me through what he would do if there was an order, I checked to see if it what he showed me followed our written procedure.
ISO9001:2008 8.2.2 Internal Auditing, as far as I can tell only requires you to "maintain records" of internal audits, not "objective evidence"'
This level of detail the auditor requires from internal audits seems excessive, especially for a company as small as ours. Is it truly a requirement?