The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > >
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Process Mapping a Civil Infrastructure Construction company

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Courtesy Quick Links


Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services


Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC



International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

AIAG - Automotive Industry Action Group

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Organization for Standardization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags
construction company or industry, process mapping
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 12th June 2018, 03:34 PM
rogerpenna

 
 
Total Posts: 13
Thank You! Process Mapping a Civil Infrastructure Construction company

So I am trying to map our company processes.

It seems the usual pattern is to follow Porter’s Value Chain of Core Processes, Support Processes, Admnistrative ones, etc. (I do not know much about Porter’s Value Chain, but I guess there is much more to it than simply showing the processes sequence).

I did not find any examples from other companies in the same branch of business as we are. But basically, 99% of our clients are government (usually municipal or state level).

That is, we are regulated by public bidding laws. Marketing, going in search of clients, everything most companies do to keep their clients... that doesn´t really apply to us.

We may do the best asphalt, provide the best post contract support. In the next public bidding, lowest price bidder will win the client.

Another thing I find hard to correlate with most examples I find, is that we work with services and most Value Chain examples I find are of companies that manufacture products.

Even in the Core processes, the sequence is not THAT logical, meaning that many processes are not exactly sequential, but parallel, while most Value Chain examples seem to have very sequential Core Processes while support processes are parallel to most of the Core Processes sequence.

That said, my understanding of Core Processes that add value to the cliente are:
Bidding – search for public bids open which requirements match our capacity, in our geographical area of operations; review of all public bid documentation in detail; confection of all paperwork showing we qualify for the bidding;
Budget : creation of a budget (sometimes thousands of items) based on materials and sub-contrator prices, plus our own prices based on past data
Contract Planning: planning of resources allocation, machines that will be used, physical-financial spreadsheets. Constant monitoring of contracts works, construction timelines. Re-planning if necessary (sometimes conditions not planned by the client in the project emerge, changing the project itself or adding (or even subtracting) major costs and timelines.
Contract Control: this is a process that runs parallel to everything else from the moment we start construction Works to the end of the contract. But I wouldn´t classify as “support”, because it deals directly with clients and it adds value to the client.
Materials Acquisition: budgeting, negotiation, acquisition of materials necessary to perform the civil infrastructure works (sand, diesel, concrete, rock/peebles, pre-molded concrete pieces, wood, asphalt, etc)
Construction/Production : it’s the actual creation of earthworks, sewer systems, roads, streets, etc.
Production Control: it involves mostly the verification of services done (both quality and completion and conformity to project), the keeping of work diaries, etc.
And finally maybe I could add
Contract Maintenance: which is a minor process actually (you see, our public clients do have their own fiscals who fiscalize every step in the project construction, so after contract is finished, it’s quite uncommon for problems to arise that need some maintenance due to contract obligations.


Of course, that’s quite a coarse granularity. Each of these Processes could have a finer granularity, specially if we decide to put it into a BPMS automating the processes.

Ps: I did not consider Acquisition of Sub-Contractor Services or Acquisition of Heavy Machinery Renting as Core Processes, as I considered those as supporting the Production/Construction. They are not essential I guess. We add sub-contractors to perform better/expanded capabilities, but we also have the capability of executing many contracts on our own.

Err... although, if I say those processes allow us to perform better and expand capabilities, maybe they add value to the client? Maybe I should have only Acquisition (which in a finer granularity would be composed of Materials Acquisition, Machinery Renting, Subcontractor Acquisition?)

Thanks for any inputs and criticism.

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 12th June 2018, 04:39 PM
John Broomfield's Avatar
John Broomfield

 
 
Total Posts: 2,658
Yin Yang Re: Process Mapping a Civil Infrastructure Construction company

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by rogerpenna View Post

So I am trying to map our company processes.

It seems the usual pattern is to follow Porter’s Value Chain of Core Processes, Support Processes, Admnistrative ones, etc. (I do not know much about Porter’s Value Chain, but I guess there is much more to it than simply showing the processes sequence).

I did not find any examples from other companies in the same branch of business as we are. But basically, 99% of our clients are government (usually municipal or state level).

That is, we are regulated by public bidding laws. Marketing, going in search of clients, everything most companies do to keep their clients... that doesn´t really apply to us.

We may do the best asphalt, provide the best post contract support. In the next public bidding, lowest price bidder will win the client.

Another thing I find hard to correlate with most examples I find, is that we work with services and most Value Chain examples I find are of companies that manufacture products.

Even in the Core processes, the sequence is not THAT logical, meaning that many processes are not exactly sequential, but parallel, while most Value Chain examples seem to have very sequential Core Processes while support processes are parallel to most of the Core Processes sequence.

That said, my understanding of Core Processes that add value to the cliente are:
Bidding – search for public bids open which requirements match our capacity, in our geographical area of operations; review of all public bid documentation in detail; confection of all paperwork showing we qualify for the bidding;
Budget : creation of a budget (sometimes thousands of items) based on materials and sub-contrator prices, plus our own prices based on past data
Contract Planning: planning of resources allocation, machines that will be used, physical-financial spreadsheets. Constant monitoring of contracts works, construction timelines. Re-planning if necessary (sometimes conditions not planned by the client in the project emerge, changing the project itself or adding (or even subtracting) major costs and timelines.
Contract Control: this is a process that runs parallel to everything else from the moment we start construction Works to the end of the contract. But I wouldn´t classify as “support”, because it deals directly with clients and it adds value to the client.
Materials Acquisition: budgeting, negotiation, acquisition of materials necessary to perform the civil infrastructure works (sand, diesel, concrete, rock/peebles, pre-molded concrete pieces, wood, asphalt, etc)
Construction/Production : it’s the actual creation of earthworks, sewer systems, roads, streets, etc.
Production Control: it involves mostly the verification of services done (both quality and completion and conformity to project), the keeping of work diaries, etc.
And finally maybe I could add
Contract Maintenance: which is a minor process actually (you see, our public clients do have their own fiscals who fiscalize every step in the project construction, so after contract is finished, it’s quite uncommon for problems to arise that need some maintenance due to contract obligations.


Of course, that’s quite a coarse granularity. Each of these Processes could have a finer granularity, specially if we decide to put it into a BPMS automating the processes.

Ps: I did not consider Acquisition of Sub-Contractor Services or Acquisition of Heavy Machinery Renting as Core Processes, as I considered those as supporting the Production/Construction. They are not essential I guess. We add sub-contractors to perform better/expanded capabilities, but we also have the capability of executing many contracts on our own.

Err... although, if I say those processes allow us to perform better and expand capabilities, maybe they add value to the client? Maybe I should have only Acquisition (which in a finer granularity would be composed of Materials Acquisition, Machinery Renting, Subcontractor Acquisition?)

Thanks for any inputs and criticism.
Roger,

Welcome to the Cove.

I hope that you are using deployment flowcharts to capture those processes as they are and not as you’d like them to be. TeamFlow was a favorite with my clients.

Your core process runs from understanding customer needs to cash in the bank so you are on the right track.

I would include the key processes of getting paid on time and paying subcontractors and suppliers for conforming services and products.

You start at bidding but I’m pretty sure that before bidding your company is making promises with its website and with its marketing and sales process, and quality is about making and keeping competitive promises.

Remember that ISO 9001 requires quality to be assured and delivered via the organization’s business processes.

Purchasing often is a support process in project-driven construction companies.

When analyzing each of the processes in your organization’s system make sure you listen well to the process expert (aka process owner) and question closely this person to understand what is actually done to prevent problems (the P in PDCA) instead of glossing over that to focus on how work is done and it’s results are inspected.

Lastly, consider including in your management system what your company does to make itself unique (broadly) and uniquely qualified to understand and satisfy the needs of each client. This may be service design and is easily missed.

Best wishes,

John
Thanks to John Broomfield for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #3  
Old 12th June 2018, 05:16 PM
rogerpenna

 
 
Total Posts: 13
Re: Process Mapping a Civil Infrastructure Construction company

Thanks for the reply John


Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by John Broomfield View Post

I hope that you are using deployment flowcharts to capture those processes as they are and not as you’d like them to be. TeamFlow was a favorite with my clients.
I am using Bizagi Modeller for Modelling As-Is processes. When automating them in the future, will be using chosen BPMS own mapping system. (of course, only for a few processes)




Quote:
I would include the key processes of getting paid on time and paying subcontractors and suppliers for conforming services and products.
Getting paid on time is a subprocess of Contract Control. It works quite different than with a private client (which are a minority). Plus there is hardly a "paid on time" when working with public sector in my country. Good news: you WILL get your money. Bad news: not sure when.



Quote:
You start at bidding but I’m pretty sure that before bidding your company is making promises with its website and with its marketing and sales process, and quality is about making and keeping competitive promises.
actually no. We don´t even have or need a website.

That's the point. Making promises? Marketing? Sales process? Quality? Nope.

When working with Public sector, the bidding process is determined by federal law, how it should occur, everything.

Public biddings are open. The client does not search us. They post a "notice". Any company can enter. If they fullfill the requirements (and the extent of requirements are also regulated by law so the bidding is "fair"), which include proof of not being in debt, of having equity and money to invest in front (before being paid), that they oblige to laws and that they have made public works of the same kind and similar extent, proving their technical capacity to fulful the contract... then they are qualified.

You see, you no need for marketing or sales. You just have to fulfill the requisites.

Being qualified, it's all a question of your bidding proposal being of lower price than the competition.


Even if a bidding process asks for proof of quality in part works, it's subjective so someone that loses the bidding will be certain to sue and block the bidding for a few years. So this is never asked.

Quote:
Remember that ISO 9001 requires quality to be assured and delivered via the organization’s business processes.
We can assure and deliver it. But we can't sell it or market it.

Quote:
Purchasing often is a support process in project-driven construction companies.
just to make sure in case of "lost in translation", we don´t make projects. Governments often bid for a company to make a project. Then bid for another company (and usually there are laws that assure it's not the same company) to execute it.

We execute projects.


Quote:
Lastly, consider including in your management system what your company does to make itself unique (broadly) and uniquely qualified to understand and satisfy the needs of each client. This may be service design and is easily missed.

this is again something hard in our sector, dealing only with public biddings. Surpassing client expectations don´t gain you more clients. Do not keep your clients.
Best wishes,

John[/QUOTE]
Thanks to rogerpenna for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #4  
Old 13th June 2018, 01:57 PM
rogerpenna

 
 
Total Posts: 13
Re: Process Mapping a Civil Infrastructure Construction company

Returning to the granularity discussion...

in a BPMS, you may sometimes need a lot of granularity for the automation to work...

that is... you may want to model processes that are very specific. In HR alone for example, I may have a dozen processes.


Let's return to the example of my own company.

"Contract Planning" is actually composed of what can be considered a dozen different processes.

Right now, we do have two written Procedures that can be categorized as the MacroProcess Contract Planning.

In truth, these written procedures could be divided in a few different processes each.


ISO 9001 asks for the organization to recognize it's processes and the relationships between them. But it doesn´t specify the granularity.


Can I show the macroprocesses (like the ones mentioned above) and their relationships, divided as Core, Management and Support macroprocesses, and then specify which processes AND/OR procedures are those macroprocesses composed of?

thanks.
  Post Number #5  
Old 13th June 2018, 02:31 PM
John Broomfield's Avatar
John Broomfield

 
 
Total Posts: 2,658
Yin Yang Re: Process Mapping a Civil Infrastructure Construction company

Roger,

I understand that by using Bizagi Modeller you are attempting to automate many tasks. I’d still engage process owners in capturing their processes in deployment flowcharts to establish the “as-built” of your process based management system as it is. Then everyone can see their system ready to determine which of the tasks to automate and to prioritize the order of your task automation project.

You may missed that ISO 9001 does specify granularity with verbiage along the lines of “to the extent necessary for effective planning, operation and control”. Reducing the role of competent humans by automating the tasks within the processes demands a helluva lot more granuality.

Yes, first capture your process-based management system with deployment flowcharts as procedures (referring to forms as necessary to collect data and to detailed “how to” instructions for critical tasks). Your flowcharted procedures show who does what and their interactions to fulfill process objectives.

It is essential to engage process owners in this.

Instead of saying macro, micro etc... I would differentiate between tasks (by individuals) and processes (by teams). This may help your colleagues to join with you in making your project successful at both the ISO 9001 and automation levels.

The scope of work necessary to complete an automation project is several orders of magnitude greater than what is necessary to develop your organization’s process-based management system so it can be used and improved to assure and deliver quality while also conforming to ISO 9001.

Best wishes,

John
Thanks to John Broomfield for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > >

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Heavy Civil Construction Company Implementing ISO 9001:2015 for Certification GLC Joe B ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1 8th August 2017 02:31 PM
Non Conformance - Root Cause & Corrective Actions - Civil Construction Projects UKS44 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3 13th September 2011 03:54 AM
Customer Feedback form (Construction company - Civil) NUEC44 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2 15th May 2010 04:55 AM
Business Process Map - Kindly review my process mapping of my company mazura Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 5 16th May 2006 08:33 PM
Quality Plan in a Service Company - Civil engineering service - Building construction Carlos Echeverry Service Industry Specific Topics 4 11th February 2005 05:17 AM



The time now is 04:37 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



Misc. Internal Links


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"