The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > >
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Recurring Natural Disasters in Contingency Plans - What's the point?

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Courtesy Quick Links


Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services


Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC



International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

AIAG - Automotive Industry Action Group

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Organization for Standardization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags
contingency plans, natural disaster
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 13th September 2018, 03:09 AM
SamuelB

 
 
Total Posts: 7
Question Recurring Natural Disasters in Contingency Plans - What's the point?

How does the IATF standard expect you to continue production when a disaster such as a cat 5 hurricane decides to tear through your area of production?

Not only could your plant be damaged beyond repair, but there are going to be utility, infrastructural, human and supply disruptions...good luck with producing parts under those circumstances. In this situations, small businesses would be shut down for good.

Not every business has a remote production facility.

Luckily where I live its unlikely that we will ever get a major disaster, but this requirement still does not make sense to me.

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 13th September 2018, 08:04 AM
Randy's Avatar
Randy

 
 
Total Posts: 8,755
Re: Recurring Natural Disasters in Contingency Plans - What's the point?

Seeing as we don't know where you are it's hard to determine whether your statement is entirely accurate, but you can always burn down...Oh wait, that's a disaster!

Any viable business that doesn't have some type of basic contingency plan for adverse events is not being real wise....
  Post Number #3  
Old 13th September 2018, 08:05 AM
John Predmore

 
 
Total Posts: 13
Re: Recurring Natural Disasters in Contingency Plans - What's the point?

In my opinion, the expectation of a risk management process is not that you continue production following a disaster, but that your company plan for significant foreseeable risk. If your company is in an area that experiences recurring natural disasters, then that would be an obvious big risk to include in business planning. Your Risk Management strategy, if it is not possible to eliminate a risk, would be to minimize the impact of the incident on stakeholders and external parties (e.g. employees and customers). You called it contingency plans. I think there are ample case studies where having a crisis reaction / recovery plan reduces duration and extent of disruption compared to having no advance plan.

Your plan may be compared to what is considered industry best practices. If the plan is put into action (a disaster occurs) you may be asked to show evidence that the plan was followed. Like all business processes, there should be periodic effort to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of the plan and those efforts should be documented.
  Post Number #4  
Old 13th September 2018, 08:22 AM
SamuelB

 
 
Total Posts: 7
Re: Recurring Natural Disasters in Contingency Plans - What's the point?

John Predmore - burning down is not a natural disaster, that's something else. We have plans in place which assume partial plant burn downs, but if we experience a full burn down I don't see how we can continue producing.

IATF should be more clear with their requirements about planning for fires and natural disasters. Good luck in implementing contingency plans when your whole plant is destroyed.
  Post Number #5  
Old 13th September 2018, 10:07 AM
Ninja's Avatar
Ninja

 
 
Total Posts: 1,088
Re: Recurring Natural Disasters in Contingency Plans - What's the point?

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by SamuelB View Post

burning down is not a natural disaster, that's something else.
I assume you are not in California then...Californians may disagree a bit...

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by SamuelB View Post

We have plans in place which assume partial plant burn downs, but if we experience a full burn down I don't see how we can continue producing.
Perhaps YOU can't produce...so what will you do?
Contract out to a competitor while you rebuild?
Rent space and equipment from the equipment manufacturer for a time?
Build off-site stock prior to the event and ship from there?
Maintain disaster stock at the customer site?

No plan is going to let you produce in a burnt shell of a building...and you aren't required to...
but you do need to have a plan for staying in business and limiting the impact on external parties.
Thanks to Ninja for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #6  
Old 13th September 2018, 10:26 AM
BradM's Avatar
BradM

 
 
Total Posts: 6,031
Re: Recurring Natural Disasters in Contingency Plans - What's the point?

Samuel... to me, the point of the contingency plan is not to try to identify a potential solution for every potential situation. Meaning, you may not be able to fix everything. But at least you have identified and documented that you won't be able to fix it.

Let's suppose... that it's Jan 2 and in the middle of the night (no one is hurt) your facility is hit by tornado or a fire. What is the plan? On Jan 3 Is everybody just going to show up and stare at the ravaged building? Are the owners just going to take the insurance money and fold up? Or... do they have plans of rebuilding and continuing operations? Are there key personnel? Do you have a plan to pay them something while production is down? Is there a contract firm that could assist with production while you are down?

So it's less about trying to propose magical (and unrealistic) solutions;and more about identifying potential risks, which ones to mitigate, and demonstrating that management agrees with the documented plan as laid out.
Thanks to BradM for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #7  
Old 13th September 2018, 07:11 PM
Randy's Avatar
Randy

 
 
Total Posts: 8,755
Re: Recurring Natural Disasters in Contingency Plans - What's the point?

What's the difference between a fire burning the place down, a tornado tossing it into the next county or 15 feet of flood water? Nothing other than ash vs an empty foundation vs mud.....Disaster is disaster, so either plan for potential consequences or don't...However your insurance carriers, investors and other interested parties may have a thing or 2 to say if not before the fact, definitely after.
Thanks to Randy for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > >

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Contingency Plans Likely to be Scrutinized More Now bobdoering IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9 16th May 2018 10:32 PM
The need for contingency plans Stijloor IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1 8th May 2018 10:28 AM
Recurring Natural Disasters - IATF 16949 Definition morteza Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations 4 21st November 2016 12:45 PM
Contingency Plans - Does TS16949 require natural disasters be included? Katheryn IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11 3rd August 2006 05:04 AM
Tornadoes - Do you have contingency plans? Mike Smith IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9 16th July 2004 04:11 PM



The time now is 06:13 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



Misc. Internal Links


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"