Most of the OEM's (Automotive) and many of thier suppliers do not put a great deal of importance in the documents (
DFMEA - Design) (SFMEA - System) and the
PFMEA (Process) and even less importance on the RPN (Risk Priority Number)and treat these documents (methods) more with disdain as something that is required but of little value. However when thinds go wrong they become the documents that the law will review to determine due care and liability.
Case in point - GM and the current issue with the ignition switch.
While I have not heard the root cause in terms of a design flaw or a manufacturing flaw - you can bet the these documents are being reviewed as we speak.
Something as simple as this appears to be, should have been easily caught within one of the above concepts.
And thier apparent unwillingness to address the issue will play a major factor in the future - whoever signed off on those documents is in a heap of trouble and additionally whoever made the decision to not address the issue when it came to light may be held criminally responsible.
As far as the previous post suggesting that there should not be a trigger - to my knowledge there is no company advocating setting an RPN trigger anymore (there were a lot of rediculous triggers set in the past 1967 to current)
Most companies today trying to use the
FMEA's thought process as it was intended - use a rolling target (3, 5, 10) whatever your organization has the resources to address.
Tom