The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Unilateral / Bilateral Tolerances for dimensions with Double Plus or Minus Tolerance


Elsmar XML RSS Feed
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services


Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC



International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Standards Organization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags (Not all threads are Tagged)
bilateral dimensional tolerances, unilateral dimensional tolerances, tolerances (dimensional or other units)
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 28th October 2002, 01:41 PM
David E. Wagher

 
 
Total Posts: 2
Please Help! Unilateral / Bilateral Tolerances for dimensions with Double Plus or Minus Tolerance

What if any rules apply to the Unilateral / Bilateral Tolerances for dimensions with
Double Plus or Minus Tolerance?
Example: 0.250 -.010 to -.020

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 28th October 2002, 03:15 PM
M Greenaway's Avatar
M Greenaway

 
 
Total Posts: 1,657
I dont know about any specific rules, or what context you are thinking of other than in broad statisitcal terms. However I dont believe there to be anything special about them, like any other tolerance you try to set your process mean on the mean of the tolerance. So a double minus or double plus of a nominal value is nothing special, just perhaps makes you think when you look for the mean of the tolerance.
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #3  
Old 28th October 2002, 04:33 PM
Sam's Avatar
Sam

 
 
Total Posts: 1,444
I would question the logic of using a tolerance that - XXX to -XXX. Appears to add nothing but confusion.
  Post Number #4  
Old 29th October 2002, 09:50 AM
Ravi Khare's Avatar
Ravi Khare

 
 
Total Posts: 70
If by uniateral, you mean one sided; then yes there is a rule. If you have a one sided tolerance (..surface roughness, perpendicularity, roundness) then the Process Capability Cpk should be calculated from whichever tolerance that is available.

I assume you are refering to rules for process centering and Cpk calculatons. If you are talking of any other rules please clarify.
  Post Number #5  
Old 30th October 2002, 01:10 AM
Ravi Khare's Avatar
Ravi Khare

 
 
Total Posts: 70
Quote:
I would question the logic of using a tolerance that - XXX to -XXX. Appears to add nothing but confusion.
This convention evolves from the use of shaft basic and the hole basic systems. Even under the Geometric Dimensioning & Tolerancing, if a 20 mm diameter shaft has to assemble with a 20 mm diameter hole, tolerances on size, location and form will lead to worst case envelopes (Virtual Conditions... as defined by the GD&T standard) on the hole as well the shaft. These virtual condition envelopes will have to clear each other if assembly is desired. The 20 mm nominal diameter hole will then have both the tolerances on the positive side, and the 20 mm nominal diameter shaft will have both the tolerances on the negative side.

This could be one of the explainations. For process control however, as Martin suggests, there is nothing special about it. You have to put your process center on the mean tolerance.
  Post Number #6  
Old 22nd November 2002, 04:17 PM
David E. Wagher

 
 
Total Posts: 2
I thank you all for the responses.
  Post Number #7  
Old 3rd June 2006, 07:10 AM
sjvasudevan

 
 
Total Posts: 8
Query on that subject

Hi All,
It is just related to this topic. Can any one help me out of this doubt.

I have a Limit Tolerance such as 25.40-25.55. The print says it is special as per customer. Can you suggest how do I fix parameters for capability studies? What is the design intent of MEAN?

Thanks in advance.
  Post Number #8  
Old 3rd June 2006, 09:27 AM
Jim Wynne's Avatar
Jim Wynne

 
 
Total Posts: 14,161
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by sjvasudevan

Hi All,
It is just related to this topic. Can any one help me out of this doubt.

I have a Limit Tolerance such as 25.40-25.55. The print says it is special as per customer. Can you suggest how do I fix parameters for capability studies? What is the design intent of MEAN?

Thanks in advance.
The "parameters" are the upper and lower tolerance limits; the nominal is 24.475 (although in this case it does represent the mean of the upper and lower limits, it's still better to refer to it as "nominal" because sometimes the tolerances limits aren't symmetrical). Only the designer knows for sure what the design intent is; you have to assume that if the part doesn't meet the tolerance limits, it won't work.
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Converting 1-Sided Design Tolerance to a Bilateral Tolerance abhipatel Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 8 11th June 2012 02:13 PM
Calculating Pp for Unilateral Tolerances Ualfliers Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 17 28th January 2010 03:49 PM
Capability calculation on unequal bilateral tolerances? lebelg Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 5 24th March 2009 09:52 AM
Pre History of SPC plus minus tolerances Caster Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 5 2nd September 2008 04:03 PM
Process Capability - Bilateral vs. Unilateral Tolerances kedarg6500 Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 1 6th February 2006 05:14 PM



The time now is 04:37 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


 
 


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"