The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > National and International Business System Standards > VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Customer request VDA 6.3 as well as TS 16949 - Page 3


Elsmar XML RSS Feed
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links that Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:

International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Standards Organization - ISO Standards and Information

Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Related Topic Tags
customer requirements, german, german car manufacturer, vda 6.3 - process audit, ts 16949 - automotive quality system standard
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  Post Number #17  
Old 30th August 2016, 05:29 AM
michajel86

 
 
Total Posts: 15
Re: Customer request VDA 6.3 as well as TS 16949

Hi Maggylu ,
thank you for examples.
To be honest there is not enough information to clarify the findings.
But VDA 6.3 clause 5.6 clearly says that suspected incomming products must be protected against access .To be honest it is about preventing the risk . Ask yourself "is there a possibility to mix suspected part with OK parts ? In case that you answer yes ,even if you estimate risk to 0,01% (100 ppm =100 potential car failures) , you have to improve your process to get 0 - ZERO DEFECT POLICY . I dont know if there were some complaints from your customer due to defects on your assemblies caused by faulty material from your supplier. .. Second one P6.1.3 - safe handling . Have you ever bought something from supermarket and the package of your favorite biscuits has been cutted ? I am sure that answer is yes . this sometimes happens .even if the workers are properly trained . there is a lot of products in the market that could perfectly fits for usage in your production -Safety box cutters . You wrote "The auditor is quite mad when seeing operators use box cutter to open the boxes" .I dont know what exactly he saw , but if he went mad ,probably he saw really dangerous manipulation by some of your operators. It is all about failure avoiding .. I saw what could happend when OEM will stop the lines due to faulty components in the past and I do know what does mean car "recall" from field .. hope you dont . (ps :english level sufficient ? )

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #18  
Old 30th August 2016, 11:01 PM
maggylu168

 
 
Total Posts: 17
Re: Customer request VDA 6.3 as well as TS 16949

Hi Michajel86,
Agree to lack of enough background information for you to properly clarify the findings. The safety box cutter is the issue that happened when the auditor picked up a box with finished goods inside and asked our operator to open it immediately. I have to say your mentioned cuttered biscuits or dangerous manipulation rarely happen in Japan, especially in a Japanese plant. The point is we think IT system control is better than human control for faulty material. Let the computer do the gating is more closer to ZERO DEFECT POLICY than human with keys. The same concept applies for FIFO as well. (another case: the auditor requires paper with serial numbers for visibility while we use ERP with barcode system to control.) I doubt maybe this is not only a culture difference but also a generation difference.
BTW, the plant is a tier-2 electronic components supplier and the audit language is German. What do you mean for "english level sufficient?" another preconception?
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #19  
Old 31st August 2016, 05:18 PM
Carol F.

 
 
Total Posts: 7
Re: Customer request VDA 6.3 as well as TS 16949

We use the VDA 6.3 checklist in all of our internal audits due to a missed opportunity of taking exception to this requirement during our CSR process. We added a column for TS on the Requirements page of the checklist so that us auditors could reference where the TS requirements align with what the VDA was looking at. It is also helpful if you can get your hands on the VDA 6.3 manual. That has even more information on each section. Hope this helps someone out there.
Attached Files: 1. Scan for viruses before using, 2. Please report any 'bad' files by Reporting this post, 3. Use at your Own Risk.
File Type: xls VDA Requirements.xls (485.5 KB, 76 views)
  Post Number #20  
Old 5th September 2016, 04:46 AM
maggylu168

 
 
Total Posts: 17
Re: Customer request VDA 6.3 as well as TS 16949

Although the comparison is between old VDA 6.3 and old TS16949, it helps a little. However, there are some wrongly or missing mapping from VDA 6.3 in the table from P4.4 to P4.9. If anyone can share the similar mapping for VDA 6.3 3rd revision and TS16949 4th revision. That would be a great big help~
  Post Number #21  
Old 16th November 2016, 04:03 AM
arinek

 
 
Total Posts: 2
Re: Customer request VDA 6.3 as well as TS 16949

The Customer Specific Requirements is the key here - as the topic started with VW and the flow down from Formel Q all suppliers in the supplier chain are requested to follow VDA 6.3 standards. The further down the supply chain the less likely the supplier is to be aware of this. How many tier 3 or 4 suppliers really know the expectations from the customer - Geographical location is no excuse - Automotive is a global operation with the increase in German based OEMS in North America this is becoming more and more common.

Recently these points are becoming more focused on the system audits also with Non Conformity's being issued now that may or may not of been issued in the past.

Last edited by arinek; 16th November 2016 at 04:14 AM.
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > National and International Business System Standards > VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Request for clarification on TS 16949 Clause 5.6.1.1 morteza IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5 30th June 2015 06:39 AM
Request for clarification on TS 16949 clause 8.4 morteza IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3 28th September 2012 06:22 PM
Request for clarification on TS 16949 Clause 7.2.2.2 morteza IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3 27th June 2011 03:01 AM
How can I say no to a customer PPAP request manojs1234 APQP and PPAP 14 27th June 2008 08:18 PM
Customer Requirements - Request customer change their drawing to match the dimension mshell ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 20 18th November 2003 09:56 AM



The time now is 02:12 PM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


 
 


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies" - A Peachfarm Internet Property