The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > National and International Business System Standards > CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU Revision ? Medical Devices - 22nd July 2014


Elsmar XML RSS Feed
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links that Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:

International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Standards Organization - ISO Standards and Information

Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags (Not all threads are Tagged)
2014, lead (pb), mdd 2011/65/eu - electrical equipment hazardous substances, medical device standards and regulations, mhra (medical & healthcare regulatory agency), rohs (restriction of hazardous substances), medical devices
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 26th March 2014, 12:16 PM
SteveK's Avatar
SteveK

 
 
Total Posts: 776
Look! RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU Revision ? Medical Devices - 22nd July 2014

This directive kicks in for medical devices on 22nd July 2014.

e.g. Lead (Pb) < 1,000 ppm by weight of homogeneous material

See:

http://www.eucomed.be/uploads/Module...ce_marking.pdf

A number of portable medical devices on the market e.g. suction aspirators, use rechargeable sealed lead acid batteries. Because of this Directive, does it mean that these types of batteries can no longer be used in medical devices? I noticed fairly recently a particular European company switched from lead acid to NiMH ? was this the driver?

Steve
Attached Files: 1. Scan for viruses before using, 2. Please report any 'bad' files by Reporting this post, 3. Use at your Own Risk.
File Type: pdf Eucomed_130522_paper_on_rohs_ce_marking.pdf (505.8 KB, 50 views)
Thank You to SteveK for your informative Post and/or Attachment!

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 27th March 2014, 08:30 AM
SteveK's Avatar
SteveK

 
 
Total Posts: 776
Lurker Re: RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU Revision ? Medical Devices - 22nd July 2014

Directive 2006/66/EC on batteries and accumulators has this:

?Directive 2002/95/EC (the first RoHS Directive) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (4) does not apply to batteries and accumulators used in electrical and electronic equipment.?

In the recast Directive 2011/65/EU it has this statement instead and with its legal-speak I found it initially confusing:

?This Directive should apply without prejudice to Union legislation on safety and health requirements and specific Union waste management legislation, in particular Directive 2006/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators (3) and Regulation (EC) No 850/2004.?

So basically I?ve answered my own question ? the recast Directive does not apply to batteries. And what I noted with a particular manufacturer was probably just a coincidence.

Anyway, for Electrical Medical Device manufacturers this recast RoHS Directive potentially is a bit onerous i.e. checking out or testing all device components for RoHS compliance. Thankfully it does not involve Notified Bodies ? they should have no involvement in compliance or otherwise from my reading of the situation. I note however, a number will offer assistance in compliance assessment/testing (obviously for a price). I assume RoHS is policed. The enforcing agency in the UK would appear to be The National Measurement Office. How do they go about this in practice?

I?ve started going through the ?RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances Related Regulations? threads to try and glean some already posted info. in an attempt to answer my own question again!

Steve
Thank You to SteveK for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #3  
Old 27th March 2014, 09:25 AM
Ronen E

 
 
Total Posts: 3,222
Re: RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU Revision ? Medical Devices - 22nd July 2014

Steve, I have 2 comments:

1. The CE marking provisions apply when a device is "Placed on the Market" or "Put into Service". This means that a device already in use (e.g. the one you gave as an example, with the lead acid battery) should not be affected. Only units placed on the market for the first time should be in compliance with new CE marking provisions (even if they are of a design that predates such provisions).

2. Notified Bodies are required to ascertain that the devices they oversee meet the Essential Requirements, including safety and health requirements that hazardous materials would definitely come under, according to "The State of the Art". I'm quite sure that the RoHS recast will be considered "State of the Art" in the EC. Thus, it seems to me likely, and also quite reasonable, that NB will oversee RoHS II compliance even though they were not directly granted powers in that regard.

Cheers,
Ronen.

Last edited by Ronen E; 28th April 2015 at 01:42 AM.
Thanks to Ronen E for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #4  
Old 28th March 2014, 08:45 AM
medgar

 
 
Total Posts: 46
Re: RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU Revision ? Medical Devices - 22nd July 2014

Hi Ronan
I think that's a fair observation. Any thoughts on how the TGA (wearing their NB hat) may look at RoHS for Australian made medical devices CE marked under the MRA with Europe ... If at all?
  Post Number #5  
Old 28th March 2014, 04:38 PM
CharlieUK

 
 
Total Posts: 112
Re: RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU Revision ? Medical Devices - 22nd July 2014

Your MD Notified Body is not is a position to issue an opinion on the RoHS Directive.

There aren't any NBs appointed for RoHS (http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newap...directive.main ).

NBs can only issue opinions on directives against which they have been appointed. And in the case of certain directives, such as R&TTE, may only be asked to give opinion against certain, specific articles, and not against others if so requested by the manufacturer.

Charlie
Thank You to CharlieUK for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #6  
Old 29th March 2014, 01:16 AM
medgar

 
 
Total Posts: 46
Re: RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU Revision ? Medical Devices - 22nd July 2014

Thanks. I wasn't aware of that subtlety.
  Post Number #7  
Old 11th June 2014, 07:03 PM
redknight07

 
 
Total Posts: 34
Re: RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU Revision ? Medical Devices - 22nd July 2014

Scope of the recast RoHS directive when compliance of components are considered seems quite complex to me. After reading several guidelines regarding this issue, I am confused as to how to interpret the following texts correctly.

One such article explaining the directive states that:

"Components, spare parts or unfinished products, as far as they do not fall under the definition of EEE are not considered EEE. Thus they don’t fall under the RoHS scope.."

So I would interpret that for components that are not an integral part of the equipment such as dummy weights with no electrical function used only for calibration and quality checks or straps made of nylon/some other material used to hold patient or software provided in a disk will not require compliance.

It then follows up with the following statements:

"Nonetheless components destined to be integrated/installed into equipment falling into RoHS scope have to comply with substance restrictions, independent of the fact whether they constitute an EEE or not.
and
Do components have to comply with RoHS 2?
RoHS 2 provides that EEE has to meet the requirements of the Directive. Since equipment consists of different components, the EEE itself can only meet the substance requirements if all its components and parts meet the substance restriction requirements of RoHS 2, including non-electronic or non-electric components like fasteners or the plastic case of a desktop computer. Therefore components being used in finished EEE or for repair or upgrade of used EEE, which is in the scope of RoHS 2 must meet the substance restrictions according to Art. 4 but do not need CE marking. Components sold as a stand-alone components or if produced to be used in a product benefiting from an exclusion do not have to be CE marked and do not have to comply with the substance requirements.”


I’m not sure if I am interpreting this correctly but I would believe that for components (non-EE) that are not contributing to the intended function of the equipment, they do not need to be in compliance. Am I correct in this assumption?

Would really appreciate your comments. Thanks.
Aniket

Last edited by redknight07; 11th June 2014 at 07:08 PM. Reason: clarity
  Post Number #8  
Old 12th June 2014, 04:08 AM
katapult

 
 
Total Posts: 7
Re: RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU Revision ? Medical Devices - 22nd July 2014

Dear all,

the ROHS2 directive is going to apply to all EEE once the transition period for all 11 categories (the last one ends June 2019) is over.

The ROHS2 directive has to be applied to all components of the final EEE that is placed on the market in the way that the restrictions for the prohibited substances are defined as per cent per weight of the final product. That is, if your final product has a weight of 1 KG for example then all parts together must not contain more than 1g of lead or mercury or 0,1g cadmium or ... et cetera.

The only exceptions to the given boundary values are listed in appendix 3.

The CE marking on the device also states that the corresponding device is in compliance with the ROHS2 directive. Additional it is compulsory to create a corresponding declaration of conformity.

The standard EN ISO 50581 gives technical background how to proof the compliance with ROHS2. Most often certain tests and their documentation is adequate to proof this.

The directive applies only when products are placed on the market as Ronen said allready. But I want to stress that an older design of a device has to be reworked to comply with ROHS2 as soon as the directive and the corresponding transition rate for the product category has expired.

I hope my explanations helped a little. For any further questions please feel free to contact me.

Last edited by katapult; 12th June 2014 at 04:47 AM.
Thanks to katapult for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > National and International Business System Standards > CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
RoHS CE Mark - Medical Devices built for US before 22 July 2014 meddevsd ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3 8th May 2014 05:24 AM
Legacy Medical Devices -- RoHS compliance in 2014 or 2019? cspofford1 RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 5 7th May 2014 02:45 PM
IVDD RoHS Directive Compliance to 2011/65/EU dr1vn RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 4 18th December 2013 06:12 AM
RoHS for Medical Devices - Does the directive apply to non-EEE accessories? Riskcord RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 1 1st July 2013 07:07 AM
Draft Revision of EU Medical Devices Directive 93/42/EEC Al Rosen ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1 22nd December 2004 05:44 PM



The time now is 02:13 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


 
 


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies" - A Peachfarm Internet Property