A
AS_QualityEngineer
Any Examples for to understand how to write corrective action request based on major finding or minor finding in the CAR Request Form
How to Write CAR (Corrective Action Request) based on scenario
Helmut Jilling
Auditor / Consultant
Re: How to Write CAR based on scenario
Identify the nonconformance in terms of the standard or procedure (ie: the standard says do this, it was not being followed).
Describe the nonconforming situation you observed, detailing the objective evidence (at station 14, such and such was being installed incorrectly)
Identify the clause or requirement of the standard or procedure that was violated.
Then, determine if any containment or immediate action is needed.
Then, investigate the causes,
Then, determine the actions to eliminate or prevent those causes from reoccurring.
Lastly, verify the actions were implemented, the root causes have been prevented or eliminated, and the actions were effective.
Hope this helps.
Identify the nonconformance in terms of the standard or procedure (ie: the standard says do this, it was not being followed).
Describe the nonconforming situation you observed, detailing the objective evidence (at station 14, such and such was being installed incorrectly)
Identify the clause or requirement of the standard or procedure that was violated.
Then, determine if any containment or immediate action is needed.
Then, investigate the causes,
Then, determine the actions to eliminate or prevent those causes from reoccurring.
Lastly, verify the actions were implemented, the root causes have been prevented or eliminated, and the actions were effective.
Hope this helps.
Re: How to Write CAR based on scenario
Now 'H', you went too far this time:mg:
All the nc should state is...........
The source of the audit criteria (Quality Manual, AS9100 clause, FAA specs etc)
The audit criteria (cut and paste the actual words from the document)
The source of the audit evidence (where you observed the nc, what records, etc)
The audit evidence (the actual observation which indicated the nc)
The 'grading' of the nc is a reflection of the audit evidence and how pervasive (systemic) the issue is.
It's not normally the job of the auditor to include the actions (containment etc) in a CAR (try writing on a non-conformity form - not a corrective action)
Andy
Now 'H', you went too far this time:mg:
All the nc should state is...........
The source of the audit criteria (Quality Manual, AS9100 clause, FAA specs etc)
The audit criteria (cut and paste the actual words from the document)
The source of the audit evidence (where you observed the nc, what records, etc)
The audit evidence (the actual observation which indicated the nc)
The 'grading' of the nc is a reflection of the audit evidence and how pervasive (systemic) the issue is.
It's not normally the job of the auditor to include the actions (containment etc) in a CAR (try writing on a non-conformity form - not a corrective action)
Andy
Helmut Jilling
Auditor / Consultant
Re: How to Write CAR based on scenario
No, we agree. The root cause , corrective and verifications come after the CA is issued. I just added them to make the list complete.
Now 'H', you went too far this time:mg:
All the nc should state is...........
The source of the audit criteria (Quality Manual, AS9100 clause, FAA specs etc)
The audit criteria (cut and paste the actual words from the document)
The source of the audit evidence (where you observed the nc, what records, etc)
The audit evidence (the actual observation which indicated the nc)
The 'grading' of the nc is a reflection of the audit evidence and how pervasive (systemic) the issue is.
It's not normally the job of the auditor to include the actions (containment etc) in a CAR (try writing on a non-conformity form - not a corrective action)
Andy
No, we agree. The root cause , corrective and verifications come after the CA is issued. I just added them to make the list complete.
Similar threads
