Roland chung
Trusted Information Resource
Hello Peter,
I think it is better to start a new thread to discuss the interesting topic which shown as the caption.
Using the frequency as the basis of the risk is quite new for me. Please allow me simply summarize your point of view: if the events are relatively high frequency (>1 events/device/year), it is correct to use the frequency to estimate the risk. That said, use of the probability in that case is wrong.
It seems to make sense for external events (e.g. misuse). Could you explain it in detail? Please give some examples, if possible.
Thanks in advance.
I think it is better to start a new thread to discuss the interesting topic which shown as the caption.
Using the frequency as the basis of the risk is quite new for me. Please allow me simply summarize your point of view: if the events are relatively high frequency (>1 events/device/year), it is correct to use the frequency to estimate the risk. That said, use of the probability in that case is wrong.
It seems to make sense for external events (e.g. misuse). Could you explain it in detail? Please give some examples, if possible.
Thanks in advance.