The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > National and International Business System Standards > ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Where to include other types of Nonconformities


Elsmar XML RSS Feed
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services


Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC



International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Standards Organization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags (Not all threads are Tagged)
nonconformance system, nonconformances
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 2nd July 2017, 06:28 PM
QAMTY

 
 
Total Posts: 431
Question Where to include other types of Nonconformities

Hi everybody.

Please share your experiences regarding how to manage non conformances of an ISO system.

Now, I follow on way but want to improve the current method.

I have a NCR format according to 8.3 control of non conformity product, but is specifically used for product, onto it we apply dispositions.

but recently I have found other issues like these:

-An operator fails to follow procedure.

- Lack of competence

-A regulatory report is not filed on time.

-People fails at filling out records, etc.

And want to start reporting these kind of issues.

Where (which format) do you think it is more recommended to raise non conformities of this type?

1 In the current format, considering it is just for product?
but adjusting it, mentioning that are included other issues, although some
of them will not have applied dispositions like if it were product?
Here a correction (disposition) will apply o maybe to be escalated to a CA.

2 To raise a CAR , mentioning the other different issues in it?
from here, a correction or full corrective action will apply.

To complement the information, As an example, in internal audits when I have findings. The finding it is fed into the CAR format (problem definition)
here, I apply just correction or carry out a full cause analysis.

I dont have a special format just for corrections,

What is practical to be followed? or do you have any other idea?

Thanks

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 3rd July 2017, 06:21 AM
Bev D's Avatar
Bev D

 
 
Total Posts: 3,505
Re: Where to include other types of Nonconformities

It's up to you of course. We can use the same electronic form for non conforming events, but we usually only do this if we are going to escalate to a corrective action. We rarely escalate, we typically just record the NC event in the aduit report and ask for immediate correction. We only escalate high risk non conforming events to CAs and these rarely come from audits. They come from our knowledge of ongoing events within the organization. Most of our CAs are product related.
Thanks to Bev D for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #3  
Old 4th July 2017, 03:41 PM
Avraham Harris

 
 
Total Posts: 32
Re: Where to include other types of Nonconformities

We also do not use NCRs (or Product Non-conformity reports (PNRs) for quality issues requiring corrective or preventive action. For these we open a Corrective action directly, and if it results from an audit, the audit is the primary source for the issue, followed by a CAPA. So I agree completely with QAMTY and Bev D.
Thanks to Avraham Harris for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #4  
Old 4th July 2017, 04:20 PM
Mark Meer

 
 
Total Posts: 611
Re: Where to include other types of Nonconformities

We have a single system procedure dealing generally with anything considered a non-conformance. This covers everything from product NCs, equipment, personnel, documentation, suppliers, etc.

This is because there are similar steps involved, regardless of the NC: documentation, evaluation, notifications, actions (includes disposition in the case of physical items, or documents).

We find that this simplifies documentation, and allows for more flexible analysis.
We can use a single generic form for documenting NCs of any type (supplemented with attachments as necessary), with a field for "category" identifying the type (product, documentation, supplier...). Because all the NC forms are maintained together on an electronic system, we can quickly, for example, see in what areas there are the most identified non-conformances, or filter by type to analyze the NCs of a particular category.

Contrast this with the approach we had previously, which involved multiple system procedures, and multiple forms for each type of NC. For our purposes, this was needlessly onerous, and inefficient - which is why we have since consolidated NC documentation. Works well for us thus far...

MM.
Thanks to Mark Meer for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #5  
Old 15th July 2017, 04:38 AM
Ettore

 
 
Total Posts: 314
Re: Where to include other types of Nonconformities

Good morning.
My experience told me do not to wait until the day of the audits to collect any evidence of non-conformity.
I have always spent a lot of time in the preparation of audits, particularly in the search for new evidence of non-conformity, and in this I was helped by tools such as SAP that allowed me to follow the sale of products from raw materials purchase.
How many suppliers used without first checking their reliability. How many materials used without the approval request process, and I could go on and on until evening.
All these findings were then collected and highlighted in an action plan along with those recorded on the day of check in Department.
In the last 8 years of my 27 spent in the same company to perform audits, perhaps the experience or the request of our automotive suppliers have led me to focus attention on the development of new products and related processes. So all the audits carried out by department had an action plan that followed our procedure for the development of new products and processes in line with the APQP.
To conclude I think an action plan in line with ISO TS16949 APQP or otherwise focused on processes/products out of standard is an excellent tool where reporting this type of non conformity.

Last edited by Ettore; 15th July 2017 at 05:34 AM.
Thank You to Ettore for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #6  
Old 15th July 2017, 08:36 PM
Randy's Avatar
Randy

 
 
Total Posts: 8,547
Re: Where to include other types of Nonconformities

I've never failed to understand the benefit of having 14 different ways to fix the same thing...Something didn't go as planned and now it has to be corrected.

Where is the cost effectiveness of having a different corecctive action process for every different problem?

Why do it one way when 14 ways can really clog the system?
Thank You to Randy for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #7  
Old 16th July 2017, 09:44 PM
Mor628

 
 
Total Posts: 29
Re: Where to include other types of Nonconformities

We experienced the same issue, where the root cause came down to human error. At that point, we created an ''internal NC'' that focused primarily on personnel.

However, over time maintaining this process became more difficult and we realized alot of the NC's resulted in the same corrective action; Updating the SOP and retraining staff.

So now, NC's only document all our output (product and service) and we track everything else with an Internal SOP log, where mistakes at staff level are recorded along with steps taken to prevent them. This also helps in our training and induction for new staff.
Thanks to Mor628 for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > National and International Business System Standards > ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
ICH Q3 - To "Include OR Not to Include" impurities below reporting threshold v9991 General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2 8th February 2015 11:31 AM
Top 10 Nonconformities in construction: such a waste... pauligle Nonconformance and Corrective Action 1 10th January 2014 01:17 PM
The Odds of Recurrence of Nonconformities biboy2012 Brain Teasers and Puzzles 6 9th May 2012 10:54 AM
Data Types and Charts - Process has different work types and sub-work types Mayank Trivedi Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 19 8th April 2008 09:35 PM
Document Types - Creating definitions for all the different document types DocConPolice Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations 6 30th March 2005 11:20 AM



The time now is 12:29 PM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


 
 


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"