The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums
Interpretation of Clause 5.5.2 in ISO 13485:2016
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Interpretation of Clause 5.5.2 in ISO 13485:2016
Interpretation of Clause 5.5.2 in ISO 13485:2016
Interpretation of Clause 5.5.2 in ISO 13485:2016
Interpretation of Clause 5.5.2 in ISO 13485:2016
Interpretation of Clause 5.5.2 in ISO 13485:2016
Interpretation of Clause 5.5.2 in ISO 13485:2016
Interpretation of Clause 5.5.2 in ISO 13485:2016
Interpretation of Clause 5.5.2 in ISO 13485:2016
Interpretation of Clause 5.5.2 in ISO 13485:2016
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > > >
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Interpretation of Clause 5.5.2 in ISO 13485:2016


Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services


Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC



International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

AIAG - Automotive Industry Action Group

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Organization for Standardization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags
iso 13485:2016, management representative, transition period
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 11th July 2018, 06:49 AM
JoshuaFroud

 
 
Total Posts: 12
Please Help! Interpretation of Clause 5.5.2 in ISO 13485:2016

Hello all

I am currently in the process of transitioning from 2003/2012 to 2016. I have a gap analysis in place that I presented to management and there is a slight disagreement as to the actual requirements of clause 5.5.2.

It is the final sentence in the clause that is causing contention, point C. Which without directly quoting the standard says "The Management Rep will promote awareness of the regulatory and QMS requirements throughout the organisation".

The feeling from management is that our current Training system of assigning relevant procedures to the different roles/employees within the organisation is sufficient to cover this requirement.

My feeling is that this is pushing for something a little more, but during the discussion, I was unable to articulate exactly what that was.

Please, can I have some input as to how others have interpreted this clause and how you have met the requirements?

Last edited by JoshuaFroud; 11th July 2018 at 06:49 AM. Reason: Edited to fix formatting errors. Extra lines everywhere!

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 11th July 2018, 07:19 AM
Marcelo Antunes's Avatar
Marcelo Antunes

 
 
Total Posts: 3,232
Re: Interpretation of Clause 5.5.2 in ISO 13485:2016

I think it's easier to understand the few "awareness" requirements if you look at another requirement, the one in 6.2.2 that says: "d) ensure that its personnel are aware of the relevance and importance of their activities and how they contribute to the achievement of the quality objectives".

I usually use one anecdote as a basis for this requirement (and I do not remember where it com from):

Imagine 3 stone breakers, ask each one "what are you doing?"
1 - breaking stone - he has no vision beyond the task and therefore does not understand the impact of his work
2 - making a window - sees beyond the task but not where the output fits into the overall context
3 - building a cathedral - he sees himself as part of the process and has a vision of what he is trying to achieve that will influence what he does

In particular, number 3 is the most aware of the relevance and importance of this activities to achieve objective, and thus, more able to contribute (for example, he may note that the stone he is breaking may not be ideal for building a cathedral and would alert his superiors, where 1 and 2 would not understand this).

The idea is the same for the "promote awareness" requirement of the MR, which is to make sure everyone is aware of the regulatory and QMS requirements.

One easy way to verify if this is being done is to ask random employees how they would act in certain simulated situations.
  Post Number #3  
Old 11th July 2018, 09:23 AM
Edward Reesor

 
 
Total Posts: 81
Re: Interpretation of Clause 5.5.2 in ISO 13485:2016

Marcus,
I share that vision completely, however I have worked for organizations in the past that treat warehouse workers (for example) as two hands and a heart beat that should have limited knowledge as to what's in the boxes they ship (and even justify it by viewing their importance to the process as being too stressful on them). Personally, I saw that as an impediment to good customer service at the very least and a detriment to the organization.

Fortunately, my current employer has employees with experience in higher level quality control that transfers to our organization and corporate culture.
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > > >

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
ISO 13485:2016 Clause 7.4.2 regarding Supplier Quality Agreements tebusse ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 11 16th July 2018 09:56 AM
Software Validation – Clause 4.1.6 of ISO 13485:2016 SteveK ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 12 5th June 2018 04:52 PM
ISO 13485:2016 Clause 6.2 - Effectiveness Check Rockdog ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1 11th January 2017 01:06 PM
Interpreting clause 4.1.5 in ISO 13485:2016 SteveK ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9 21st November 2016 05:57 PM
Interpretation of ISO 13485 Clause 8.4 - Analysis of Data Roland Cooke ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 20 26th January 2010 12:23 PM



The time now is 07:13 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



Misc. Internal Links


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"