The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > >
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

ISO 45001:2018 - Occupational Health and Safety Management Standard - Page 14

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Courtesy Quick Links


Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services


Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC



International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

AIAG - Automotive Industry Action Group

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Organization for Standardization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags
iso 45001 - occupational health and safety management standard, occupational health and safety (oh&s), risk based thinking (rbt), risk management and analysis
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #105  
Old 14th September 2018, 06:04 AM
blockbuster's Avatar
blockbuster

 
 
Total Posts: 10
Re: ISO 45001:2018 - Occupational Health and Safety Management Standard

I have done a bit of research on this now, and I think the following blog sets things out nicely with regards to answering my initial question about clause 6.1.2.2.

I have highlighted the relevant text in Bold which points to what I think is what an auditor would/should be looking for in terms of applying methodologies to the carrying out of risk assessments.

In the end, whether we use a 'severity' x 'likelihood' risk scoring matrix or not, if we conclude that a hazard is a high or low risk we still have to have defined a methodology for working this out. Agreed?

Read on....

Cheers
Block

Source: pegasus legal register (pm me for full link)

Clause 6.1.2.2 Assessment of OH&S risks and other risks to the OH&S management system

The organization must establish, implement and maintain a process to:

• Assess OH&S risks from the identified hazards, whilst taking into account the effectiveness of existing controls;

• Determine and assess the other risks related to the establishment, implementation and maintenance of the OH&S management system.
An organization needs to apply the process of hazard identification and risk assessment to determine the controls that are necessary to reduce the risks of injury and/or ill health. The purpose of risk assessment is to address the hazards that might arise in the course of the organization’s activities and ensure that the risks to people arising from these hazards are assessed, prioritized and controlled.

This is achieved by:

• Developing a methodology for hazard identification and risk assessment;

• Identifying hazards;

• Estimating the associated risk levels, taking into account the adequacy of existing controls, based on an assessment of the likelihood of the occurrence of a hazardous event or exposure and the severity of injury or ill health that can be caused by the event or exposure;

• Determining whether these risks are acceptable vis a vis the organization’s legal obligations and its OH&S objectives;

• Determining the appropriate risk controls, where these are found to be necessary;

• Documenting the results of the risk assessment;

• Reviewing the hazard identification and risk assessment process on an ongoing basis.

The outputs from the risk assessment process should be used in the implementation and development of other parts of the OH&S management system such as competence, operational planning and control, and monitoring, measurement, analysis and performance evaluation.
There is no single methodology for hazard identification and risk assessment that is suitable for all organizations. Hazard identification and risk assessment methodologies vary greatly across industries, ranging from simple assessments to complex numerical methods with extensive documentation.

Individual hazards might require that different methods be used, e.g. an assessment of long term exposure to hazardous substances might need a different method from that taken for equipment safety or for assessing an office workstation. Each organization should choose the method that is appropriate to its scope, nature and size. The chosen approach should result in a comprehensive methodology for the ongoing evaluation of the organization’s risks.

Where the organization’s risk assessment uses descriptive categories for assessing severity or likelihood of harm, these should be clearly defined, e.g. clear definitions of terms such as “likely” and “unlikely” are needed to ensure that different individuals interpret them consistently.

The organization should consider risks to sensitive populations (e.g. pregnant employees) and vulnerable groups (e.g. young workers) as well as any particular susceptibilities of the individuals involved in performing particular tasks (e.g. the ability of an individual to read instructions).

The risk assessment should involve consultation with, and participation by, workers and take into account legal and other requirements.
Risk assessment should be conducted by personnel with competence in risk assessment methodologies and techniques and appropriate knowledge of the organization’s work activities.

The organization should also consider risks which are not directly related to the health and safety of people, but which affect the OH&S management system itself and can have an impact on its intended outcomes.
Risks to the OH&S management system include:

• Failure to understand the context of the organization;
• Failure to address the needs and expectations of relevant interested parties;
• Inadequate consultation and participation of workers;
• Inadequate planning or allocation of resources;
• An ineffectual audit programme;
• An incomplete management review;
• Poor succession planning for key roles;
• Poor engagement by top management.

Sponsored Links
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > >

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Publication of ISO 45001 - Occupational Health and Safety - Further delays? Claes Gefvenberg Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 6 3rd August 2017 12:08 PM
Risk Analysis for Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems SRIKANTH PRASAD Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 4 16th August 2012 07:44 AM
Z10 Occupational Health and Safety Standard - Has anyone seen the final version? BSMITH Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 8 14th November 2008 11:33 AM
What is OHSAS 18001? An auditable Occupational Health & Safety System standard - BSi Dean P. Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 17 19th February 2005 02:35 PM
International Occupational & Health Safety Management System Standard Randy Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 9 31st October 2002 07:04 PM



The time now is 09:23 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



Misc. Internal Links


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"