The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Nonconformance and Corrective Action
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

CAPA (corrective action preventive action) Effectiveness - Medical Device Industry

Elsmar XML RSS Feed
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links

Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:

International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Standards Organization - ISO Standards and Information

International Quality Services

Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum

Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining

Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 21st February 2006, 07:15 AM

Total Posts: 61
Please Help! CAPA (corrective action preventive action) Effectiveness - Medical Device Industry

Apologises if this question has already been asked. My background is in the Medical Device Industry

When assessing the effectiveness of a corrective action my first thought is....
Has the same non conformance arisen again?

However this is surely not the only means by which people assess the effectiveness of a CA. Would anyone be able to provide additional guidance.

Many thanks in advance

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 25th February 2006, 08:55 PM

Total Posts: 71
Iso/tr 14969:2004

See Guidance ISO/TR 14969:2004 explanation or clarification for section 8.5.2 and 8.5.3.

If product related issues, you could look at other sources of quality data, e.g. complaints, service calls, field returns, replacement part shipments, besides the usual nonconforming material records.

If supplier caused product related issues, above mentioned data sources usually are the first ones to be looked at.

Depends on the degree of the problems, you could also look up engineering change requests and number of subsequent ECOs on same or similar issues. For example, if the issue originally is a specific component in a subassembly, you could also run a NCR, ECR, complaint, service calls data (for examples) to see if anyone has complained or raised issues about the subassembly that may be caused by the component.

If the issue is process related, you could add a re-audit to the internal audit schedule for that particular process. You could wait a couple months and then pull some samples of the records to evaluate if the fixes were indeed effective.
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #3  
Old 26th February 2006, 09:41 AM
Bev D's Avatar
Bev D

Total Posts: 3,363
I use several methods:
before the corrective action is implemented I verify that the root cause was identified. does the original analysis makes sense? I look at the data to ensure that the analysis adn conclusion was logical. If the origical defect/failure was variation based I require hypothesis testing to prove that the root cause was determined (turn it on and off); if error based, I look at the objective evidence and why-why (Apollo method) that led us to the root error (and condition if applicable). Sometimes we can use the hypothesis approach here as well to turn it on and off.

Once I am satisfied that the root has been determined I look for evidence that the selected correctivea ction will actually work: again a hypothesis test works here OR simple logic if error based - what level of mistake proofing is proposed. However, I also look for the controls that will be applied (if the mistake proofing is not at the highest level.

Then I approve the corrective action.

THEN I audit the implementation to ensure that the corrective action (and any applicable controls) were implemented and are beign followed. I do this at least twice: shortly after the reported implementation date to verify implementation and a few weeks/months later to validate that it is sustainable in real life. It also becomes part of our interanl audits, 5S, or Six Sigma audits as applicable for long term sustainability.

Then I VALIDATE: does the defect/failure occur again? of course teh time frame for this is dependent on the natural frequency of occurence of the original problem.
  Post Number #4  
Old 26th February 2006, 04:22 PM

Total Posts: 61

Many thanks for your advice. Is appreciated

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Nonconformance and Corrective Action


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
How to measure CAPA (Corrective Action Preventive Action) System Performance QA Memphis Nonconformance and Corrective Action 20 9th August 2010 11:36 AM
High Level CAPA (Corrective Action Preventive Action) SOP Example Needed Calico Nonconformance and Corrective Action 6 31st October 2009 09:45 PM
Complaints & CAPA's (Corrective Action Preventive Action) for Clinical Trials PPcricket ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4 10th August 2009 08:35 AM
Corrective & Preventive action templates for CAPA in telecom industry a_bardi Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2 14th June 2005 08:32 AM
Audit Program and CAPA (Corrective Action - Preventive Action) Effectiveness e006823 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4 22nd July 2004 01:51 PM

The time now is 12:43 PM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"