The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Customer and Company Specific Requirements
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Ford, Daimler Chrysler and GM Now Require ISO 14001 Registration - Page 7

Elsmar XML RSS Feed
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links

Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:

International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Standards Organization - ISO Standards and Information

International Quality Services

Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum

Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining

Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

Some Related Topic Tags (Not all threads are Tagged)
chrysler, customer specific requirements (csr), daimlerchrysler, general motors (gm), iso 14001 - environmental management systems, ford motor company
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 1.00 average. Display Modes
  Post Number #49  
Old 23rd October 2000, 09:04 AM

Total Posts: n/a
Yin Yang DaimlerChrysler Requires ISO-14001

Today I received a letter from the VP of Supplier Quality at DC, dated 10/5/00.

This letter states that effective January 1, 2003, "DaimlerChrysler will require its suppliers to be third party registered to an environmental management system based on ISO-14001."

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #50  
Old 30th October 2000, 08:59 PM
michael busha

Total Posts: n/a
Me too! Got the letter on Saturday. They gave us until the end of 2002.

Sponsored Links

  Post Number #51  
Old 4th January 2001, 01:59 AM

Total Posts: 77
Thumbs up

I have a letter from DaimlerChrysler dated Oct. 5/00 it reads:

Effective January 1, 2003, DaimlerChrysler will require its suppliers to be third party registered to an environmental management system based on ISO 14001.
  Post Number #52  
Old 4th June 2001, 04:26 PM
Sam's Avatar

Total Posts: 1,444
Registration Requirement

I have heard that the Big 3 have or will sometime in the future require registration to the requirements of ISO-14000.
Does anyone have info on this. I haven't seen anything in writing.
The standard presently allows " a self-determination and self-declaration of conformance with the internationaal standard".
  Post Number #53  
Old 4th June 2001, 09:11 PM
Randy's Avatar

Total Posts: 8,535
GM is apparently buying off on self declaration. The others (Ford, Chrysler) want 3rd party registration. Old news. Check their web sites or look in the archives here.
  Post Number #54  
Old 26th September 2001, 05:16 PM

Total Posts: n/a
Question Big three requirements for ISO 14001

Hi everyone good day to ya'll. I have two questions to ask.

1. My company is ISO 14001 certified in addition to QS 9000. We are a Tier one supplier to the big three and then some. My question is: Is there a memo, document or anything from the big three (3) that states registration / certification to ISO 14001 is a must. I looked up the AIAG site but found nothing. Is there a web site I can go to?? Reaon for this question is the higher ups (it's always them) want to scrap the program.

2. Can I get samples of good flowcharts to guide me in establishing PPAP requirements. One from a Supplier's point of view and one from a customer's point of view. Naturally I do not have a budget nor have I had any training except I have read the PPAP manual.

Any and all help is appreciated. Thanks in advance.
  Post Number #55  
Old 26th September 2001, 06:21 PM
Randy's Avatar

Total Posts: 8,535
If you're a Tier 1 supplier to the Big 3 you ought to already have all the documentation you need. This issue was addressed by the back in '99 when they told all their Tier 1's to do this. There is a pretty good trail of the discussions we had here in the Forum archives I think. Just search back to 1999 and follow what we said then.

I can tell you this though. If your top guys want to quit 14K to save money or make it easy tell them to forget getting money from those other guys. Ford has stated in no uncertain terms. No 14K-No moola. The others are about the same. Oh yeah to varying degrees so are the Japanese, Koreans, Germans and most of the rest of the civilized industrial world of automakers. Either get in the boat or learn to tread water. There are probably other companies waiting in the wings to fill your spot.

What never ceases to amaze me is how when people get to the TOP they automatically become smarter or sharper businessmen through osmosis, or the water, or through the crak they share in the boys room.

Tell them peeing and moaning about 14K with the Big 3 is a dead horse that doesn't need to be beaten anymore.

  Post Number #56  
Old 2nd October 2001, 04:27 PM
db's Avatar

Total Posts: 2,590
Money Big three requirements for ISO 14001

Here is what we are telling folks about the Big Three Requirements:

ĽAt least one manufacturing site from each production and non-production supplier must be third-party registered by December 31, 2001, and all manufacturing sites shipping products by July 1, 2003
General Motors
ĽAll suppliers must implement an EMS by December 31, 2002 that is third-party certified or self-certified through a written declaration by a responsible executive. Third- party confirmation is strongly preferred.
ĽAll suppliers must be third-party registered to an EMS based on ISO 14001 by January 1, 2003. The requirements of the EMS do not need to be established independently of the Quality Management System.

Hope it helps. Also, we have used ISO 14K to "find" real dollars in customer operations! In many cases, it more than paid for the effort.

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Customer and Company Specific Requirements


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Does TS still apply for Chrysler and Daimler Caster IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1 13th February 2008 06:19 PM
Daimler Chrysler is no more Howard Atkins Customer and Company Specific Requirements 2 6th November 2007 03:34 AM
Daimler may dump ailing Chrysler as 13,000 more jobs are cut Marc News! 3 15th February 2007 09:27 AM
NHTSA - Ford Focus and Dodge Durango (Daimler-Chrysler) to be recalled Marc News! 1 8th February 2005 11:02 AM
Daimler-Chrysler Supplier Mentoring Program barbt Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 3 8th July 2003 10:13 AM

The time now is 04:50 PM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"