Re: ISO 17025 - GLP Gap analysis
Hi gang!
I've attached one here from NATA (Australian version of NIST), which is the only one I've ever been able to locate, after many, many searches. If you dismiss the references to NATA and NAR in the text, the direction it gives is to the point and effective. I've used it as a guideline for four facilities now, and it has proven to be a very good tool.
17025 is a peculiar beast, especially when the lab is part of a larger organization that already has a Quality Department and a Quality Manager or Director. Fur can start flying over 'territorial jurisdiction' relative to who should have surveillance over lab processes. We've divided up the internal audits, leaving the process audits up to the lab QM, and the overal standards audit to qualified internal auditors from the main Quality Department. Seems to be working o.k.
Good luck with your accreditation. Hope all goes well for you.
~Spanky~