The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > National and International Business System Standards > Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120)
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Why folks prefer ISO 22000 instead of BRC or SQF?


Elsmar XML RSS Feed
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links that Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:

International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Standards Organization - ISO Standards and Information

Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Related Topic Tags
brc food safety program, food (general), food safety, food standards, iso 22000 - food safety management systems
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 6th November 2011, 08:11 PM
Ka Pilo

 
 
Total Posts: 610
Question Why folks prefer ISO 22000 instead of BRC or SQF?

Why folks prefer ISO 22000 instead of BRC or SQF?

Considering that all of them are stand-alone standards.

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 6th November 2011, 08:16 PM
Marc's Avatar
Marc

 
 
Total Posts: 25,328
Re: Why folks prefer ISO 22000 instead of BRC or SQF?

Why don't you start out by telling us which one you "prefer", why you prefer it, which one your company actually uses, and why?

My assumption is you yourself are familiar with all 3 standards. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #3  
Old 6th November 2011, 08:37 PM
AndyN's Avatar
AndyN

 
 
Total Posts: 8,459
Caution Re: Why folks prefer ISO 22000 instead of BRC or SQF?

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Ka Pilo View Post

Why folks prefer ISO 22000 instead of BRC or SQF?

Considering that all of them are stand-alone standards.
In your country, that may be a true statement. It isn't true in the USA. You may wish to rephrase the comment for a global context, which is the reach of the Cove.
Thanks to AndyN for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #4  
Old 6th November 2011, 10:04 PM
Ka Pilo

 
 
Total Posts: 610
Re: Why folks prefer ISO 22000 instead of BRC or SQF?

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Marc View Post

Why don't you start out by telling us which one you "prefer", why you prefer it, which one your company actually uses, and why?

My assumption is you yourself are familiar with all 3 standards. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
I'm not a direct user of BRC or SQF. It's just frustrating to note confusion from food sfatey professionals (both users, and auditors).

The following is a quote from Soon Loy and an example of confustion (OPRP vs CP) from standards designed for Food Safety:

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Soon Loy View Post

Just wish to inform that we have successfully achieved FSSC22000 and BRC-Food (Issue 5) in an integrated audit recently. Although the issue on the interpretation of OPRP was raised by the auditor, all verification activity data/evidence were in place to support the system. So it was kind of anti-climax as we maintain our position that OPRP is CP even though the auditor had other ideas! Thanks to those who participated on this thread.
So, I wish to ask "Is ISO 22000 written in plain English?" Why there are so much confusion with ragard to interpretation?
  Post Number #5  
Old 6th November 2011, 10:26 PM
Marc's Avatar
Marc

 
 
Total Posts: 25,328
Re: Why folks prefer ISO 22000 instead of BRC or SQF?

I have not seen a standard yet that is not open to interpretations of its contents. In fact this site was started based upon the problem of the different interpretations of ISO 9001:1994 and what was then QS-9000.

You ask "Is ISO 22000 written in plain English?" I ask, what standard isn't open to interpretation?

As to the differences between ISO 22000, BRC and SQF - That's an entirely different question. Food processing isn't my area of expertise so I have no idea what the differences are.

But let's get back to your original question:
Quote:
Why folks prefer ISO 22000 instead of BRC or SQF?
It may be more of an issue of the requirements of the specific country you are in and if you sell to foreign countries what their requirements are.

Again I ask of you: Why don't you start out by telling us which one you "prefer", why you prefer it, which one your company actually uses, and why?
  Post Number #6  
Old 6th November 2011, 10:49 PM
Ka Pilo

 
 
Total Posts: 610
Re: Why folks prefer ISO 22000 instead of BRC or SQF?

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Marc View Post

I have not seen a standard yet that is not open to interpretations of its contents. In fact this site was started based upon the problem of the different interpretations of ISO 9001:1994 and what was then QS-9000.

You ask "Is ISO 22000 written in plain English?" I ask, what standard isn't open to interpretation?

As to the differences between ISO 22000, BRC and SQF - That's an entirely different question. Food processing isn't my area of expertise so I have no idea what the differences are.

But let's get back to your original question: It may be more of an issue of the requirements of the specific country you are in and if you sell to foreign countries what their requirements are.

Again I ask of you: Why don't you start out by telling us which one you "prefer", why you prefer it, which one your company actually uses, and why?
Our company (the management) prefers ISO 22000. Personally, I prefer BRC or SQF because Global Food Safety Initiative Standards compliant, and therefore accepted everywhere.

The confusion started when OPRP was introduced by ISO 22000, I think.
  Post Number #7  
Old 7th November 2011, 10:09 PM
Soon Loy

 
 
Total Posts: 28
Re: Why folks prefer ISO 22000 instead of BRC or SQF?

There are many food safety standards that have evolved over the years and each one has their own list of requirements which are basically the same. ISO is making an attempt to "harmonize" ISO22000 as an internationally recognized FSMS standard. IMO, I believe this was not largely achieved but it created a lot of awareness about FSSC22000. And, in the meantime, other standards have also dropped off in the demand ranking ladder as new standards under GFSI come into the fore.

Ultimately, the customers will determine which food safety standard they want you to have and from that stand point, I believe GFSI's recognized schemes will very much be in the forefront. I also agree that we are bound to have interpretation issues no matter which and what standards we have to deal with. That is the sad part of what we have to live with.
Thanks to Soon Loy for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #8  
Old 10th November 2011, 08:43 AM
tsmith7858's Avatar
tsmith7858

 
 
Total Posts: 129
Re: Why folks prefer ISO 22000 instead of BRC or SQF?

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by AndyN View Post

In your country, that may be a true statement. It isn't true in the USA. You may wish to rephrase the comment for a global context, which is the reach of the Cove.
As Andy indicates preference is dependent on where you are located. Although FSSC 22000 (and by extension ISO 22000) is gaining popularity in the US, SQF is the predominant standard at this point.

It probably has something to do with the fact that most of the large US retailers requested or referenced SQF first. Most now accept any GFSI accepted standard.

From a food producer standpoint in the US, there does seem to be a movement toward FSSC 22000 but I think it is because most of them already have ISO 9001 and the transition is easier.
Thank You to tsmith7858 for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > National and International Business System Standards > Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120)

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Why the majority prefer to call each passage of ISO 9001 a ?clause?? Polly Pure Bread ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11 27th April 2009 09:49 PM
ISO/TS16949 Certification Body Ranking - Which one do you prefer? H_YWF IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2 6th February 2006 09:11 AM
What hotels and motels do you prefer to stay in and why? Marc Travel - Hotels, Motels, Planes and Trains 27 9th June 2005 04:48 PM
Heroes or Villains? Whom do we prefer? Wes Bucey Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 0 3rd January 2004 06:23 PM



The time now is 06:08 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


 
 


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies" - A Peachfarm Internet Property