The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > National and International Business System Standards > Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

API Q1 9th Edition - My Experiences (A Diary)


Elsmar XML RSS Feed
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links that Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:

International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Standards Organization - ISO Standards and Information

Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags (Not all threads are Tagged)
api q1 - oil industry quality management system (qms)
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 5 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 21st October 2013, 11:36 AM
NHopkins

 
 
Total Posts: 22
I Say... API Q1 9th Edition - My Experiences (A Diary)

Morning All:

Background.
I'm Nick, Quality Manager for a smallish Design/Manufacturing company in Lafayette Louisiana servicing the Oil and Gas Industry. We are going through the trials and tribulations of switching from ISO 9001-2008 to API Q1 9th ed and will be Q1 certified (along with getting a API 16.D monogram license) hopefully in January 2014.

I started this thread to share my ongoing experiences and hopefully good insight into this whole process as well as to get an idea of how many O&G folks are here at the Cove and maybe we can talk Marc into a section just for us...

Last Friday we did yet another internal audit, this time with a focus on risk assessment. My owners decided, after a lengthy discussion, that our risks were pretty standard across all projects and so I developed a very simple risk matrix covering the broad spectrum risks (i.e. Hurricane, fire, supplier failure to deliver, etc) on one side and the outlines of contingency planning on the other. I ran this by a former API auditor and he agreed that as long as we make sure to capture any risks associated with non-standard projects we should be fine. I'm a big proponent of painting with broad strokes to start and detailing on a case by case basis where applicable.

Keep in mind folks, there is no quick fix when changing from ISO to Q1 9th ed. I don't remember the revision but 9th ed reminds of ISO pre-2000 when I was with Grant Prideco. Lot's of procedures, everything a controlled document, lot's of checklists. I couldn't use our ISO manual at all, had to start fresh. We went from 7 procedures and a process flow to 26 procedures (combined where I could), an engineering process flow, and 2 work instructions.

I'm rambling, sorry. Look forward to hearing from others!

N
Thanks to NHopkins for your informative Post and/or Attachment!

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 21st October 2013, 01:22 PM
Marc's Avatar
Marc

 
 
Total Posts: 25,503
Re: API Q1 9th Edition - My Experiences (A Diary)

There are a couple of "diaries" here, but none regarding API Q1. I'm sure your input will be very appreciated. Thank you!
Thanks to Marc for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #3  
Old 6th November 2013, 04:58 PM
McMoose78

 
 
Total Posts: 1
Re: API Q1 9th Edition - My Experiences (A Diary)

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by NHopkins View Post

Morning All:

Background.
I'm Nick, Quality Manager for a smallish Design/Manufacturing company in Lafayette Louisiana servicing the Oil and Gas Industry. We are going through the trials and tribulations of switching from ISO 9001-2008 to API Q1 9th ed and will be Q1 certified (along with getting a API 16.D monogram license) hopefully in January 2014.

I started this thread to share my ongoing experiences and hopefully good insight into this whole process as well as to get an idea of how many O&G folks are here at the Cove and maybe we can talk Marc into a section just for us...

Last Friday we did yet another internal audit, this time with a focus on risk assessment. My owners decided, after a lengthy discussion, that our risks were pretty standard across all projects and so I developed a very simple risk matrix covering the broad spectrum risks (i.e. Hurricane, fire, supplier failure to deliver, etc) on one side and the outlines of contingency planning on the other. I ran this by a former API auditor and he agreed that as long as we make sure to capture any risks associated with non-standard projects we should be fine. I'm a big proponent of painting with broad strokes to start and detailing on a case by case basis where applicable.

Keep in mind folks, there is no quick fix when changing from ISO to Q1 9th ed. I don't remember the revision but 9th ed reminds of ISO pre-2000 when I was with Grant Prideco. Lot's of procedures, everything a controlled document, lot's of checklists. I couldn't use our ISO manual at all, had to start fresh. We went from 7 procedures and a process flow to 26 procedures (combined where I could), an engineering process flow, and 2 work instructions.

I'm rambling, sorry. Look forward to hearing from others!

N
Hi Nick,

I'm in the same situation, but at the beginning stages. Just attended an API Q1 9th edition training course in Houston. Would you be willing to share a copy of your Quality Manual as a guideline?

Regards,
Arthur
  Post Number #4  
Old 6th November 2013, 06:43 PM
Marc's Avatar
Marc

 
 
Total Posts: 25,503
I Say... Re: API Q1 9th Edition - My Experiences (A Diary)

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by NHopkins View Post

<snip> maybe we can talk Marc into a section just for us? <snip>
There you go. Your own forum.

Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations
Thanks to Marc for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #5  
Old 23rd January 2014, 06:57 AM
gvb12345

 
 
Total Posts: 1
Re: API Q1 9th Edition - My Experiences (A Diary)

Dear ALL,
Please give me some idea aboubt how to write procedure for 5.3-risk assessment and management
5.5-contengency planning
  Post Number #6  
Old 30th January 2014, 12:26 PM
Irshad Khan

 
 
Total Posts: 27
Re: API Q1 9th Edition - My Experiences (A Diary)

Hi Nick,

Why consider risks associated with Hurricane, fire etc. This is not the intent of Q1 9th Ed and more related with H.S.E. Q1 has identified four categories to assess risks and develop CP.

Last edited by Irshad Khan; 30th January 2014 at 02:20 PM.
  Post Number #7  
Old 30th January 2014, 01:37 PM
NHopkins

 
 
Total Posts: 22
Re: API Q1 9th Edition - My Experiences (A Diary)

Actually anything that can effect delivery on a product will fall under risk assessment. Hurricane may cause us to slide delivery to the right a week or more, which in turn activates all kinds of quality processes to deal with the aftermath of being shut down for as little as a day or as long as needed. Our risk assessment matrix covers natural disasters and lines out what steps we would possibly need to take (including customer notifications, supplier communication, adding shifts and hiring temporary workers, renting generators and air compressors...etc) to limit the impact on delivery.

I've actually checked the validity of this through our API contact.

Thanks!
Nick
  Post Number #8  
Old 31st January 2014, 06:10 PM
Irshad Khan

 
 
Total Posts: 27
Re: API Q1 9th Edition - My Experiences (A Diary)

Nick,
Thanks for your reply. I do not intend to challenge and true that many things can affect the delivery of product, however in 5.3 risks associated with Facility/equipment, supplier, delivery of non conforming product and availability of competent personnel are mentioned and as such required.
One can make a big shopping list but is every item really needed? Because if we try to buy everything we may end up just with more expenses.
The idea of taking into account Natural disasters came from QS 9000 (which I do not know if still a valid QMS).
The API certainly do not want to make business more expensive and customer will not pay for it.

Irshad Khan
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > National and International Business System Standards > Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Project Sweden - Teaching Lean - A Diary asutherland Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 39 19th October 2013 04:19 AM
An ISO/TS16949 Registration Maintenance Diary Icy Mountain IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 124 19th September 2013 08:01 AM
6 October 2011 - Diary of an iMac repair Marc Forum News and General Information 13 8th October 2011 04:15 AM
Transfer of Accredited Certification - A Diary Paul Simpson General Auditing Discussions 17 15th March 2011 04:58 AM
A TS 16949 Implementation through Registration Project Diary - Automotive Icy Mountain IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 97 28th June 2010 10:15 AM



The time now is 12:43 PM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


 
 


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies" - A Peachfarm Internet Property